Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022856579> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2022856579 endingPage "149" @default.
- W2022856579 startingPage "144" @default.
- W2022856579 abstract "The purpose of this study was to compare the 3 different fixation methods of posterior type superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) II lesion. Fifteen cadavers were randomly divided into 3 groups to compare the initial strength of 3 different fixation methods in posterior type II SLAP lesions. Group I used 1 anchor for 1-point fixation with a conventional simple suture; group II used 1 anchor passing both limbs through the posterior-superior labrum in a mattress fashion; and group III used 2 anchors for 2-point fixation with conventional simple sutures. Repair failure (2 mm permanent displacement of repaired site) and ultimate failure were measured. The mean load to (clinical) failure was 156 ± 22 N in group I, 117 ± 33 N in group II, and 161 ± 44 N in group III. The mean load to ultimate failure was 198 ± 6 N in group I, 189 ± 23 N in group II, and 179 ± 22 N in group III. The specimen stiffness was equivalent among groups. In mode of failure, clinical failure (more than 2 mm separations) first occurred between the markers on the biceps tendon just above (A) and below (B) compared to other markers, and ultimate failure occurred at the labral-implant interface. A single simple suture anchor repair in posterior type II SLAP seems sufficient to withstand the initial load without clinical failure. A mattress suture, although it anchors the biceps root, seems to be inferior than simple suture technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the 3 different fixation methods of posterior type superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) II lesion. Fifteen cadavers were randomly divided into 3 groups to compare the initial strength of 3 different fixation methods in posterior type II SLAP lesions. Group I used 1 anchor for 1-point fixation with a conventional simple suture; group II used 1 anchor passing both limbs through the posterior-superior labrum in a mattress fashion; and group III used 2 anchors for 2-point fixation with conventional simple sutures. Repair failure (2 mm permanent displacement of repaired site) and ultimate failure were measured. The mean load to (clinical) failure was 156 ± 22 N in group I, 117 ± 33 N in group II, and 161 ± 44 N in group III. The mean load to ultimate failure was 198 ± 6 N in group I, 189 ± 23 N in group II, and 179 ± 22 N in group III. The specimen stiffness was equivalent among groups. In mode of failure, clinical failure (more than 2 mm separations) first occurred between the markers on the biceps tendon just above (A) and below (B) compared to other markers, and ultimate failure occurred at the labral-implant interface. A single simple suture anchor repair in posterior type II SLAP seems sufficient to withstand the initial load without clinical failure. A mattress suture, although it anchors the biceps root, seems to be inferior than simple suture technique." @default.
- W2022856579 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2022856579 creator A5026288702 @default.
- W2022856579 creator A5030701630 @default.
- W2022856579 creator A5031283377 @default.
- W2022856579 creator A5061030253 @default.
- W2022856579 creator A5074145904 @default.
- W2022856579 creator A5077293394 @default.
- W2022856579 creator A5088572563 @default.
- W2022856579 date "2008-01-01" @default.
- W2022856579 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2022856579 title "A biomechanical comparison of repair techniques in posterior type II superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions" @default.
- W2022856579 cites W1824894308 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W1950229146 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W1964773994 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W1966216137 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W1969562428 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W1983302424 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2006159162 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2011165548 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2031344849 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2034879605 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2042391870 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2068461345 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2078608430 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2080840375 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2081257861 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2169576477 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2210975906 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2280042797 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W2288028338 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W54985886 @default.
- W2022856579 cites W99077286 @default.
- W2022856579 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.025" @default.
- W2022856579 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18069010" @default.
- W2022856579 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2022856579 type Work @default.
- W2022856579 sameAs 2022856579 @default.
- W2022856579 citedByCount "30" @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792012 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792013 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792014 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792015 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792016 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792017 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792018 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792020 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792022 @default.
- W2022856579 countsByYear W20228565792023 @default.
- W2022856579 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2022856579 hasAuthorship W2022856579A5026288702 @default.
- W2022856579 hasAuthorship W2022856579A5030701630 @default.
- W2022856579 hasAuthorship W2022856579A5031283377 @default.
- W2022856579 hasAuthorship W2022856579A5061030253 @default.
- W2022856579 hasAuthorship W2022856579A5074145904 @default.
- W2022856579 hasAuthorship W2022856579A5077293394 @default.
- W2022856579 hasAuthorship W2022856579A5088572563 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C2775889985 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C2778614594 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C2780105995 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C2781425419 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C105702510 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C141071460 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C146249460 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C2775889985 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C2777327002 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C2778614594 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C2779162959 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C2780105995 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C2781411149 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C2781425419 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C2908647359 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C71924100 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C91762617 @default.
- W2022856579 hasConceptScore W2022856579C99454951 @default.
- W2022856579 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2022856579 hasLocation W20228565791 @default.
- W2022856579 hasLocation W20228565792 @default.
- W2022856579 hasOpenAccess W2022856579 @default.
- W2022856579 hasPrimaryLocation W20228565791 @default.
- W2022856579 hasRelatedWork W2024714414 @default.
- W2022856579 hasRelatedWork W2046091239 @default.
- W2022856579 hasRelatedWork W2098046576 @default.
- W2022856579 hasRelatedWork W2121185959 @default.
- W2022856579 hasRelatedWork W2134350123 @default.
- W2022856579 hasRelatedWork W2198271051 @default.
- W2022856579 hasRelatedWork W2325906106 @default.
- W2022856579 hasRelatedWork W2424708210 @default.