FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022882542> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022882542 endingPage "396" @default.
• W2022882542 startingPage "396" @default.
• W2022882542 abstract "Handoffs have significantly increased in number following Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work-hour restrictions. Studies have shown correlations between the number of handoffs and errors/patient harm. Distractions are common during handoffs and may interfere with handoff quality and effectiveness.To examine the frequency of distractions and their impact on handoff quality.In this prospective observational study, a total of 214 surgical resident handoffs (residents = 184; Bay area residents [moonlighters] = 30) were observed over 18 months (July 11, 2012-December 19, 2014) by 2 independent observers in 3 teaching hospitals (university, county, and veterans).Handoff quality (both giver and receiver) was assessed using a standardized scoring system. The number and types of distractions were recorded.Pages were the most common distraction (37.5%), followed by telephone calls (32.8%), residents/medical students (9.3%), talking (5.2%), and noise (4.1%). Distractions from attending physicians, electronics, nursing, consults, and room changes were less common (collectively 11%, each <3%). Distractions were present in 102 resident handoffs (48%) (16% with 1 distraction; 15% with 2; 6% with 3, and 11% with ≥4). Distractions occurred in 54% of junior resident handoffs (mean, 1.4/handoff), 30% of moonlighter handoffs (mean, 0.5/handoff), and 38% of senior resident handoffs (mean, 0.89/handoff) (P = .01, junior vs moonlighter/senior). Distractions were more common during evening than morning handoffs (52% vs 36%; P = .045) and during team vs individual handoffs (58% vs 44%; P < .10). Handoffs without distractions were shorter in length (13.2 minutes without distractions vs 21.5 minutes with distractions; P < .001) and minutes per patient (1.78 without vs 2.15 with distractions; P = .04). Handoff quality was not diminished by distractions, as measured by handoff giver score (15.41 without vs 15.47 with distractions; P = .90) and receiver score (7.42 without vs 7.25 with distractions; P = .45).To our knowledge, this is the largest study of distractions during surgical resident handoffs. Distractions were very common during handoffs; they were more common in the evening when junior residents more commonly performed the handoff and they increased the handoff length. However, distractions did not negatively affect the quality of resident handoffs. This may demonstrate the resilience of surgical residents to distractions." @default.
• W2022882542 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022882542 creator A5023839266 @default.
• W2022882542 creator A5030178148 @default.
• W2022882542 creator A5079335045 @default.
• W2022882542 date "2015-05-01" @default.
• W2022882542 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2022882542 title "Distractions During Resident Handoffs" @default.
• W2022882542 cites W125215614 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W1497688183 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W1960916357 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W1970115284 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W1974677913 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W1976741610 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W1982888377 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2004637567 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2013683637 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2014527737 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2023385680 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2038003010 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2043052447 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2046956268 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2054671775 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2081268267 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2083602610 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2095535364 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2096801998 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2100673063 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2101753117 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2103402721 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2105060300 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2127908243 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2137635834 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2138226178 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2159124642 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2161436956 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W2167670447 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W3022307797 @default.
• W2022882542 cites W3183664035 @default.
• W2022882542 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2459" @default.
• W2022882542 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25738805" @default.
• W2022882542 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2022882542 type Work @default.
• W2022882542 sameAs 2022882542 @default.
• W2022882542 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422015 @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422016 @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422017 @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422018 @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422019 @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422020 @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422021 @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422022 @default.
• W2022882542 countsByYear W20228825422023 @default.
• W2022882542 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022882542 hasAuthorship W2022882542A5023839266 @default.
• W2022882542 hasAuthorship W2022882542A5030178148 @default.
• W2022882542 hasAuthorship W2022882542A5079335045 @default.
• W2022882542 hasBestOaLocation W20228825421 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C111852164 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C2776378700 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C2776476923 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C111852164 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C121332964 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C1276947 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C15744967 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C160735492 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C162324750 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C169760540 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C194828623 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C2776378700 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C2776476923 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C2779328685 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C2779767262 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C31258907 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C41008148 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C50522688 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C509550671 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C545542383 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C61521584 @default.
• W2022882542 hasConceptScore W2022882542C71924100 @default.
• W2022882542 hasIssue "5" @default.

• next