FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022892817> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022892817 endingPage "402" @default.
• W2022892817 startingPage "385" @default.
• W2022892817 abstract "A recent Australian television documentary, Art from the Heart? presented a case for believing that Aboriginal paintings produced for the market could not be authentic.' The documentary assumed there was such a thing as Aboriginal and that this was and spiritual but that the items for sale were not genuine Four claims were made to show this. First, the paintings in question are not spiritually motivated but were produced for sale and therefore are not traditionally Aboriginal. Second, Aboriginal paintings produced in acrylics, on canvas, or in any other medium that is not traditional, are not authentic. Third, some paintings were not produced by people of Aboriginal descent and are not, therefore, Aboriginal And fourth, as some paintings were not produced by the persons who were believed to have produced them, the Aboriginal people who signed them were engaged in the production of fakes. These claims were supposed to lead us to the conclusion that the paintings under question are fakes: in the sense that they are not traditional Aboriginal art and in the sense that they are not art. Yet, Aboriginal groups have presented counter-claims that challenge Western philosophical preconceptions about authenticity in painting. They have claimed that works that are obviously inauthentic from a Western perspective are in fact authentic. If such claims by Aboriginal groups about authenticity can be sustained, then Aboriginal painting has a significantly different ontological structure than painting in the Western tradition. In this paper, I attempt to articulate this structure. Aboriginal claims about authenticity seem to rely on some kind of relationship between Aboriginal and Aboriginal identity. I argue that (precontact and present-day) Aboriginal ceremonial designs have the same ontological structure as insignia. The model of Aboriginal as insignia has significant explanatory power. The ontology of insignia shows that Aboriginal claims about the relationship between their and their identity can be understood literally, and it organizes a wealth of anthropological detail about the relationship between art, land, and authority. In addition, the ontology of insignia fits with a pattern of Aboriginal judgments about the authenticity of the paintings and practices that have been the subjects of scandals. If North American indigenous totemic is also insignia, the argument presented here may also be of interest in the context of debates about North American indigenous and identity and the authenticity of indigenous This paper is divided into four sections. In the first section, I present a synopsis of the current debate about indigenous or primitive and authenticity and show how my approach differs from the usual approaches. In the second section, I discuss a number of scandals involving Aboriginal paintings between 1996 and 1999 and articulate the differences between Western and Aboriginal attitudes toward the authenticity of the paintings. In the third section, I develop a model of Aboriginal as insignia. The insignia model provides different criteria for determining the authenticity of paintings. If I am right about this, the reasons presented in Art from the Heart? for believing the paintings to be inauthentic and, therefore, not Aboriginal are based on false premises. My model is based on tribal Aboriginal culture and is not applicable to all contemporary Aboriginal However, as the painters that have been involved in the scandals are from remote communities, it is applica-" @default.
• W2022892817 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022892817 creator A5006144102 @default.
• W2022892817 date "2001-11-01" @default.
• W2022892817 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2022892817 title "Aboriginal Painting: Identity and Authenticity" @default.
• W2022892817 cites W2016285423 @default.
• W2022892817 cites W2072063440 @default.
• W2022892817 cites W3121852326 @default.
• W2022892817 cites W3204520007 @default.
• W2022892817 cites W583846812 @default.
• W2022892817 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8529.00040" @default.
• W2022892817 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2022892817 type Work @default.
• W2022892817 sameAs 2022892817 @default.
• W2022892817 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2022892817 countsByYear W20228928172013 @default.
• W2022892817 countsByYear W20228928172014 @default.
• W2022892817 countsByYear W20228928172019 @default.
• W2022892817 countsByYear W20228928172020 @default.
• W2022892817 countsByYear W20228928172023 @default.
• W2022892817 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022892817 hasAuthorship W2022892817A5006144102 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConcept C205783811 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConceptScore W2022892817C107038049 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConceptScore W2022892817C142362112 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConceptScore W2022892817C153349607 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConceptScore W2022892817C205783811 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConceptScore W2022892817C2778355321 @default.
• W2022892817 hasConceptScore W2022892817C52119013 @default.
• W2022892817 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2022892817 hasLocation W20228928171 @default.
• W2022892817 hasOpenAccess W2022892817 @default.
• W2022892817 hasPrimaryLocation W20228928171 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W109438073 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W1570554585 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W2016842982 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W2253945764 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W2268712973 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W2734541884 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W2796092422 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W594894524 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W627686627 @default.
• W2022892817 hasRelatedWork W635221961 @default.
• W2022892817 hasVolume "59" @default.
• W2022892817 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2022892817 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2022892817 magId "2022892817" @default.
• W2022892817 workType "article" @default.