FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2022893652> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2022893652 endingPage "710" @default.
• W2022893652 startingPage "703" @default.
• W2022893652 abstract "A prospective, three-armed, randomized, controlled trial was performed to assess whether pelvic floor exercises with biofeedback using anal manometry or transanal ultrasound are superior to pelvic floor exercises with feedback from digital examination alone in terms of continence, quality of life, physiologic sphincter strength, and compliance. Its secondary objectives were to assess whether there are any differences in these outcomes between biofeedback with transanal ultrasound vs. anal manometry and to correlate the physiologic measures with clinical outcome.One hundred twenty patients with mild to moderate fecal incontinence were randomized into one of three treatment groups: biofeedback with anal manometry, biofeedback with transanal ultrasound, or pelvic floor exercises with feedback from digital examination alone. Commencing one week after an initial 45-minute assessment session, patients attended monthly treatments for a total of five sessions. Each session lasted 30 minutes and involved sphincter exercises with biofeedback that involved instrumentation or digital examination alone, and patients were encouraged to perform identical exercises twice per day between outpatient visits.One hundred two patients (85 percent) completed the four-month treatment program. Across all treatment allocations, patients experienced modest but highly significant improvements in all nine outcome measures during treatment, with 70 percent of all patients perceiving improvement in symptom severity and 69 percent of patients reporting improved quality of life. With the possible exception of isotonic fatigue time, there were no significant differences between the three treatment groups in compliance, physiologic sphincter strength, and clinical or quality-of-life measures. Correlations between physiologic measures and clinical outcomes were much stronger with ultrasound-based measures than with manometry.Although patients in this study who completed pelvic floor exercises with feedback from digital examination achieved no additional benefit from biofeedback and measurement with transanal ultrasound or manometry, it may be that the guidance received through digital examination alone offered patients in the pelvic floor exercise group an effective biofeedback mechanism. Contrary to our hypothesis, the use of transanal ultrasound offered no benefit over manometry, but the use of ultrasound for isotonic fatigue time and isometric fatigue contractions provided potentially important physiologic measures that require further study. This study has confirmed, through a large sample of patients, that pelvic floor retraining programs are an effective treatment for improving physiologic, clinical, and quality-of-life parameters in the short term." @default.
• W2022893652 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2022893652 creator A5001400905 @default.
• W2022893652 creator A5009946426 @default.
• W2022893652 creator A5016210071 @default.
• W2022893652 creator A5018127150 @default.
• W2022893652 creator A5060274786 @default.
• W2022893652 date "2003-06-01" @default.
• W2022893652 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2022893652 title "Randomized, Controlled Trial of Biofeedback With Anal Manometry, Transanal Ultrasound, or Pelvic Floor Retraining With Digital Guidance Alone in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Fecal Incontinence" @default.
• W2022893652 cites W124691637 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W179591318 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W1840753075 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W19659503 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W1977942789 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W1992179644 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W1996211649 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2011627011 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2012199965 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2017757754 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2018217926 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2019124556 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2022747318 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2036236755 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2037539132 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2045716528 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2046236533 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2050996004 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2064952346 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2072056781 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2077155705 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2081599941 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2083611769 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2086891220 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2090124353 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2096127740 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2097144897 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2271708520 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2312510239 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2320725355 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2331145223 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W24299651 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W268967917 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W560025642 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W171122792 @default.
• W2022893652 cites W2332840599 @default.
• W2022893652 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6643-9" @default.
• W2022893652 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12794569" @default.
• W2022893652 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2022893652 type Work @default.
• W2022893652 sameAs 2022893652 @default.
• W2022893652 citedByCount "127" @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522012 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522013 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522014 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522015 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522016 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522017 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522018 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522019 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522020 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522021 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522022 @default.
• W2022893652 countsByYear W20228936522023 @default.
• W2022893652 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2022893652 hasAuthorship W2022893652A5001400905 @default.
• W2022893652 hasAuthorship W2022893652A5009946426 @default.
• W2022893652 hasAuthorship W2022893652A5016210071 @default.
• W2022893652 hasAuthorship W2022893652A5018127150 @default.
• W2022893652 hasAuthorship W2022893652A5060274786 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C108797546 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C2776377089 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C2776813522 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C2780691517 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C2781244320 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C108797546 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C141071460 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C159110408 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C168563851 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C1862650 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C2776377089 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C2776813522 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C2779951463 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C2780691517 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C2781244320 @default.
• W2022893652 hasConceptScore W2022893652C71924100 @default.
• W2022893652 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2022893652 hasLocation W20228936521 @default.
• W2022893652 hasLocation W20228936522 @default.
• W2022893652 hasOpenAccess W2022893652 @default.
• W2022893652 hasPrimaryLocation W20228936521 @default.
• W2022893652 hasRelatedWork W1977784775 @default.

• next