Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023171295> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 49 of
49
with 100 items per page.
- W2023171295 endingPage "367" @default.
- W2023171295 startingPage "357" @default.
- W2023171295 abstract "This pape reports on a survey of 64 biotechnology firms in the USA about their R&D strategy, marketing focud and sources of technology. The survey explored the interrelationships among the strategic issues and how they were related with the means of appropriating R&D results. Three stralegic clusters for technology acquisitin emerged from the data: (i) internal developer, (ii) joint developer, and (iii) cooperative financed. Three marketing clusters were: (i) market penetartor, (ii) innovative marketer, and (iii) market developer. The R&D clusters were: (i) defensive strategy, (ii) aggressive strategy, and (iii) research-intensive strategy. External sources of technology appeared to be predominant among thje various firms and apparently marketing strategy and source of technology had no significant relationship. Most of the firms were involved with commercial innovation in their R&D strategy and few were research specialists. Innovative firms were inclined to depend on external sources sources of technology. Issues related to appropriability of R&D results for the different groups have been examined for their implications for public policy." @default.
- W2023171295 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2023171295 creator A5000593726 @default.
- W2023171295 creator A5017525850 @default.
- W2023171295 date "1989-01-01" @default.
- W2023171295 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2023171295 title "Marketing and r&d strategies for biotechnology firms in the usa" @default.
- W2023171295 cites W2012804439 @default.
- W2023171295 cites W2036399426 @default.
- W2023171295 cites W2057288723 @default.
- W2023171295 cites W2065496593 @default.
- W2023171295 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/09537328908523981" @default.
- W2023171295 hasPublicationYear "1989" @default.
- W2023171295 type Work @default.
- W2023171295 sameAs 2023171295 @default.
- W2023171295 citedByCount "9" @default.
- W2023171295 countsByYear W20231712952014 @default.
- W2023171295 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2023171295 hasAuthorship W2023171295A5000593726 @default.
- W2023171295 hasAuthorship W2023171295A5017525850 @default.
- W2023171295 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2023171295 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W2023171295 hasConcept C40700 @default.
- W2023171295 hasConcept C93032411 @default.
- W2023171295 hasConceptScore W2023171295C144133560 @default.
- W2023171295 hasConceptScore W2023171295C162853370 @default.
- W2023171295 hasConceptScore W2023171295C40700 @default.
- W2023171295 hasConceptScore W2023171295C93032411 @default.
- W2023171295 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2023171295 hasLocation W20231712951 @default.
- W2023171295 hasOpenAccess W2023171295 @default.
- W2023171295 hasPrimaryLocation W20231712951 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2046251599 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2064482383 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2107538442 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2336198615 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2348150280 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2389856211 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2513819851 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2894602164 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W2969964158 @default.
- W2023171295 hasRelatedWork W3009129949 @default.
- W2023171295 hasVolume "1" @default.
- W2023171295 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2023171295 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2023171295 magId "2023171295" @default.
- W2023171295 workType "article" @default.