Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023175775> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 87 of
87
with 100 items per page.
- W2023175775 endingPage "1162" @default.
- W2023175775 startingPage "1158" @default.
- W2023175775 abstract "If the goal of partial liquid ventilation (PLV) with perfluorocarbons in the management of respiratory failure is to improve dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) while sustaining O2 delivery, the optimal ventilatory management is unclear. The authors asked if volume-cycled or pressure-limited ventilation had different effects on PVR, cardiac index (CI), and Cdyn in uninjured and injured neonatal piglet lungs.Anesthetized piglets (6 to 8 kg) were ventilated after tracheostomy. Cdyn was measured by in-line Fleisch pneumotach/PC data acquisition terminal. Thermodilution instrumentation allowed determination of both CI and PVR. Volume-control or pressure-limited ventilation was established in uninjured or injured (surfactant deficiency induced by saline lavage at 18 mL/kg) animals. After a stable 30-minute baseline, animals were assigned randomly to one of four groups: group I (n = 9), uninjured animals plus volume-cycled ventilation (intermittent mandatory ventilation [IMV], 10 bpm; tidal volume [TV], 15 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], 5 cm H2O; FIO2, 1.0; and PLV for 150 minutes); group II (n = 9), uninjured animals plus pressure-limited ventilation (IMV, 10 bpm; peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), 25 cm H2O, PEEP, 5 cm H2O, FIO2, 1.0; and PLV for 150 minutes); group III (n = 7), injured animals plus volume-cycled ventilation (IMV, 10 bpm; TV, 15 mL/kg; PEEP, 5 cm H2O; FIO2, 1.0 for 30 minutes, followed by saline injury for group IV (n = 7), injured animals plus pressure-limited ventilation (IMV, 10 bpm; PIP, 25 cm H2O; PEEP, 5 cm H2O; FIO2, 1.0 for 30 minutes, followed by saline injury, and PLV rescue). Comparison within and between groups was accomplished by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey correction.There was no significant difference between volume-cycled or pressure-limited ventilation in healthy lungs; however, in the setting of lung injury, dynamic compliance was 1.44 +/- 0.15 after 180 minutes in the volume-cycled group and 0.91 +/- 0.10 in the pressure-limited group after the same interval (mL/cm H2O x kg +/- SEM). Similarly, PVR was 100 +/- 6 in the volume-cycled group and 145 +/- 12 in the pressure-limited group after 180 minutes of lung injury (mm Hg/L/kg x min +/- SEM). Cardiac index declined significantly in all groups independent of ventilatory mode.These results suggest that in the setting of lung injury, Cdyn and PVR improved significantly when volume-cycled, compared with pressure-limited ventilation was used. Although no difference existed between ventilatory modes in healthy lungs, pressure-limited ventilation, when combined with PLV in injured lungs, had adverse effects on lung compliance and pulmonary vascular resistance. Volume-cycled ventilation may optimize the ability of perfluorocarbon to recruit collapsed or atelectatic lung regions." @default.
- W2023175775 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2023175775 creator A5027012330 @default.
- W2023175775 creator A5089189137 @default.
- W2023175775 creator A5091661299 @default.
- W2023175775 date "1998-07-01" @default.
- W2023175775 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2023175775 title "Pressure- versus volume-cycled ventilation in liquid-ventilated neonatal piglet lungs" @default.
- W2023175775 cites W1983034001 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W1986199914 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W1999400692 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W2003442522 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W2017249554 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W2037828131 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W2056540596 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W2057636301 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W2086863044 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W2121864429 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W2416035168 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W4232548876 @default.
- W2023175775 cites W4245750089 @default.
- W2023175775 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90551-6" @default.
- W2023175775 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9694114" @default.
- W2023175775 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
- W2023175775 type Work @default.
- W2023175775 sameAs 2023175775 @default.
- W2023175775 citedByCount "12" @default.
- W2023175775 countsByYear W20231757752012 @default.
- W2023175775 countsByYear W20231757752017 @default.
- W2023175775 countsByYear W20231757752018 @default.
- W2023175775 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2023175775 hasAuthorship W2023175775A5027012330 @default.
- W2023175775 hasAuthorship W2023175775A5089189137 @default.
- W2023175775 hasAuthorship W2023175775A5091661299 @default.
- W2023175775 hasBestOaLocation W20231757751 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C136936797 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C200457457 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C2775904088 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C2777080012 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C2777257755 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C2777397205 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C2777785262 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C2778917391 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C534529494 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConcept C79959777 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C126322002 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C127413603 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C136936797 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C200457457 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C2775904088 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C2777080012 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C2777257755 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C2777397205 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C2777785262 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C2778917391 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C42219234 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C534529494 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C71924100 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C78519656 @default.
- W2023175775 hasConceptScore W2023175775C79959777 @default.
- W2023175775 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W2023175775 hasLocation W20231757751 @default.
- W2023175775 hasLocation W20231757752 @default.
- W2023175775 hasOpenAccess W2023175775 @default.
- W2023175775 hasPrimaryLocation W20231757751 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W1983916958 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W2023175775 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W2035319479 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W2324871443 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W2355400475 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W2381276511 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W2525079717 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W2994614297 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W3012962033 @default.
- W2023175775 hasRelatedWork W3030982028 @default.
- W2023175775 hasVolume "33" @default.
- W2023175775 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2023175775 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2023175775 magId "2023175775" @default.
- W2023175775 workType "article" @default.