FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023194328> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023194328 endingPage "348" @default.
• W2023194328 startingPage "347" @default.
• W2023194328 abstract "Recently we reported improved proteome coverage and quantitation metrics for low abundance proteins within whole proteomes by incorporation of a novel digestion and depletion strategy prior to a standard shotgun proteomic analysis. Our goal was to improve the proteomic metrics of low abundance proteins by reducing proteolytic background, namely reducing the highly sampled peptides derived from high abundance proteins. Our method was successful in reducing proteolytic background. Conceptually we rationalized these gains resulted from a selective digestion and removal of abundant proteins, as peptides. Since our report, the mechanism by which our gains were achieved has been challenged in a Correspondence by Ye et al. (Nat. Methods, 2014). In response, we have reanalyzed our data in a peptide-centric manner and propose a refined kinetic mechanism consistent with established competitive substrate kinetics.Through a simplified derivation beginning with a classical Michaelis-Menten competitive substrate model and further quantitative analysis of our data, we provide a refined depletion mechanism that more accurately describes the complex mixtures we previously analyzed. Our revised qualitative expression describing depletion of early-generated peptides from proximal fast tryptic cleavage sites with high specificity constants (V/K) (Supplementary Note 1) is illustrated by the following equation: χA,depleted=(χA)t=0e(−VK)Atc∑(χn)t=0e(−VK)ntc−(χA)t=0e(−VK)Atd∑(χn)t=0e(−VK)ntd(1)where χA,depleted is the mole fraction of substrate A after complete (tc) and depletion (td) digestion times expressed as mole fraction of total substrate cleavage sites. So expressed, tryptic sites have different specificity constants as well as abundances. Substrate cleavage results in the generation of two shorter polypeptides that can be subsequently cleaved into more substrates over time. The relative cleavage rates are governed by each site’s relative specificity constant. From this perspective, we redefine the mechanism for depletion and enrichment of the digestion and depletion of abundant proteins (DigDeAPr) method. Early-generated peptides, derived from fast substrate sites (i.e. high V/K) within ~ 100 amino acids of each other, are removed at the point of our 10K molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) spin-filter depletion step. Clearing of these early-generated peptides prior to further digestion, provides an enrichment of peptides resulting from slower tryptic sites in the subsequent complete digestion step. By use of equation 1 we illustrate the expected adjustment in peptide abundance resulting from limited digestion and depletion (Figure 1a) as driven by the relative cleavage site specificity constants (V/K). When peptide abundance is considered between control and DigDeAPr runs, the expected trend is observed (Figure 1b, Supplementary Figure 1, and Supplementary Note 2) consistent with theory. Notably, the use of 10-fold more starting material and depletion of early-generated peptides acts to equalize the measured abundance of all peptides. Since peptide abundances are used to estimate protein abundance with shotgun proteomics,1–4 the equalization of peptides acts to also equalize the measurable abundance of proteins, as we found empirically in our initial analysis.Figure 1Theoretical and empirical comparison of DigDeAPr mechanism. (a) Schematic of dominant mechanism from digestion and depletion based on the cleavage site specificity constant (V/K) for a given protease. The natural abundance of peptides from a complete ...Our depletion runs provide a defined, limited digestion time point for consideration of the aforementioned kinetic efficiencies through analysis of early- and later-generated peptides and fast and slow tryptic cleavage sites (Supplementary Note 3). Early-generated peptides should be depleted and have lower abundances after DigDeAPr when compared to control runs, while later-generated peptides should be enriched and have higher abundances. Using label-free chromatographic peak area ratios of peptides in both control and DigDeAPr runs, we quantified 13,628 and 13,112 peptides in HEK (Figure 2a) and yeast cells, respectively, that were used to classify peptides as early- or later-generated by their relative ratios. Both distributions show defined populations of peptides that were depleted (log2 ratio ≤ −1), unchanged (–1 < log2 ratio < 1), and enriched (log2 ratio ≥ 1). Focusing on the HEK peptide distribution, motif analysis of cleaved (Figure 2b) and missed cleaved (Figure 2c) tryptic sites on depleted peptides validates that early-generated peptides from proximal fast tryptic cleavage sites (< ~100 amino acids apart) are selectively removed during the 10 kDa depletion step (Supplementary Note 4). Similarly, tryptic motifs of enriched, later-generated peptides represent slow cleavage sites (Figure 2d) that remain uncleaved within polypeptides of greater than 10 kDa at the depletion time point. Thus, consideration of tryptic sites and peptides in the digestion and depletion mechanism is essential and illustrates the depletion and enrichment of peptides from fast and slow tryptic cleavage sites, respectively.Figure 2Motif analysis to support DigDeAPr mechanism. (a) Distribution of quantified HEK peptide ratios using label-free peak area measurements from Fonslow et al. Tryptic site motif analysis using IceLogo6 and peptide ratios from analysis of HEK cells categorized ...With these peptide-centric considerations of abundance, when early- and later-generated peptides are now considered in our protein abundance analyses we notably still observe an abundance-based depletion and enrichment trend in both yeast and HEK cells: more abundant proteins have more early-generated peptides identified and less abundant proteins have more later-generated peptides identified (Supplementary Figure 5 and Note 5). Based on this data and our understanding of peptide sampling in shotgun proteomics,1 we conclude that our gains originate from analysis of a different population of enriched, later-generated peptides. That is, depletion of early-generated peptides from high abundance proteins removes enough proteolytic background to unmask and identify more later-generated peptides from low abundance proteins. Although we may not have explicitly depleted abundant proteins through digestion, in our reanalysis we find that depletion or enrichment of single peptides account for ~ 30% (1/slope = 0.298) of the observed protein abundance depletion or enrichment, respectively, explained by ~ 60% (R2 = 0.57) of the protein abundance measurements (Supplementary Figure 6 and Note 6). Additionally, we found a notable overlap in depleted, early-generated yeast peptides and “proteotypic” yeast peptides (Supplementary Figure 7 and Note 5). While “proteotypic” peptides can be used to robustly identify and quantify many proteins, they can also act as proteolytic background for other less abundant or less sampled proteins and peptides.5 These results collectively indicate that depletion of highly-sampled, abundant, easily-identified, “proteotypic” peptides has a similar effect as depleting abundant proteins to improve identification and quantification of peptides from low abundance proteins.With our refined view of peptide abundance changes and their correlation to protein changes, we propose a dominant mechanism by which our proteome coverage and quantitation gains are realized through digestion and depletion: depletion of early-generated peptides and enrichment of later-generated peptides equalizes measurable peptide abundances and unmasks less “proteotypic” peptides for improvements in low abundance protein identification and quantification. Based on these new contributing mechanisms, DigDeAPr instead represents digestion and depletion of abundantly sampled peptides and proteins through enrichment of less easily digested and identifiable proteins and peptides. Nonetheless, the combination of ten-fold more starting material with limited digestion and depletion remains a robust and promising method to remove the most easily and repeatedly detected peptides, clearing chromatographic, electrospray ionization, and mass spectrometer space for improvements in identification coverage and quantification of low abundance proteins. These new mechanistic insights suggest that varying limited digestion times in combination with the use of other proteases with different site specificity constants (V/K) and different MWCO filter sizes may hold the most potential to further improve coverage and quantitation of whole proteomes. We are excited about the future possibilities of similar methods and mechanistic investigations to further improve proteomic coverage and quantitation in shotgun proteomics." @default.
• W2023194328 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023194328 creator A5008461978 @default.
• W2023194328 creator A5019665230 @default.
• W2023194328 creator A5026984593 @default.
• W2023194328 creator A5037053192 @default.
• W2023194328 creator A5060654871 @default.
• W2023194328 creator A5063648205 @default.
• W2023194328 creator A5083768832 @default.
• W2023194328 date "2014-02-27" @default.
• W2023194328 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2023194328 title "Addendum: Digestion and depletion of abundant proteins improves proteomic coverage" @default.
• W2023194328 cites W1572033224 @default.
• W2023194328 cites W1964039782 @default.
• W2023194328 cites W1997504014 @default.
• W2023194328 cites W2000042427 @default.
• W2023194328 cites W2002264839 @default.
• W2023194328 cites W2039380477 @default.
• W2023194328 cites W2053894359 @default.
• W2023194328 cites W2091273971 @default.
• W2023194328 cites W2128551987 @default.
• W2023194328 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0314-347" @default.
• W2023194328 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4408018" @default.
• W2023194328 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24724171" @default.
• W2023194328 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2023194328 type Work @default.
• W2023194328 sameAs 2023194328 @default.
• W2023194328 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2023194328 countsByYear W20231943282015 @default.
• W2023194328 countsByYear W20231943282016 @default.
• W2023194328 countsByYear W20231943282017 @default.
• W2023194328 countsByYear W20231943282018 @default.
• W2023194328 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023194328 hasAuthorship W2023194328A5008461978 @default.
• W2023194328 hasAuthorship W2023194328A5019665230 @default.
• W2023194328 hasAuthorship W2023194328A5026984593 @default.
• W2023194328 hasAuthorship W2023194328A5037053192 @default.
• W2023194328 hasAuthorship W2023194328A5060654871 @default.
• W2023194328 hasAuthorship W2023194328A5063648205 @default.
• W2023194328 hasAuthorship W2023194328A5083768832 @default.
• W2023194328 hasBestOaLocation W20231943281 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C2778945725 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C2781357212 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C46111723 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C70721500 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConcept C95444343 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C104317684 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C17744445 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C185592680 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C199539241 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C2778945725 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C2781357212 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C43617362 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C46111723 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C55493867 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C70721500 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C86803240 @default.
• W2023194328 hasConceptScore W2023194328C95444343 @default.
• W2023194328 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2023194328 hasLocation W20231943281 @default.
• W2023194328 hasLocation W20231943282 @default.
• W2023194328 hasLocation W20231943283 @default.
• W2023194328 hasLocation W20231943284 @default.
• W2023194328 hasOpenAccess W2023194328 @default.
• W2023194328 hasPrimaryLocation W20231943281 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W1614434693 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W1892840179 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W1968953234 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W2080856312 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W2088324202 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W2138270701 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W2153167812 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W2161712355 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W2341060983 @default.
• W2023194328 hasRelatedWork W4248659496 @default.
• W2023194328 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2023194328 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023194328 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023194328 magId "2023194328" @default.
• W2023194328 workType "article" @default.