FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023205231> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023205231 endingPage "249" @default.
• W2023205231 startingPage "239" @default.
• W2023205231 abstract "There are abundant data and advisories for mercury levels in wild fish, but far fewer for commercial fish that compose a large majority of the fish most people eat. Until recently, relatively little attention has been devoted to examining mercury in canned tuna, despite its great importance in human diets. There is substantial media coverage of the benefits and risk from fish consumption, but few peer-reviewed data on canned tuna, the most commonly consumed fish in the United States. In this paper, we examine the levels of total mercury in canned tuna obtained from a New Jersey grocery store from 1998 to 2003, looking for temporal consistency within this data set and particularly for comparison with the Food and Drug Administration's 1991 study. We analyzed 168 cans individually for total mercury. All values are reported as parts per million (=μg/g) on a wet weight basis. In a subset of samples analyzed for total and inorganic mercury, the inorganic mercury was below detection levels; hence at least 89% of the mercury can be considered methylmercury. We found that white-style tuna had significantly more total mercury (mean 0.407 ppm) than light-style tuna (mean 0.118 ppm), presumably reflecting that “white” tuna is albacore, a species relatively larger than the skipjack tuna, which is commonly available as “light” or “chunk light.” The maximum mercury in a can was 0.997 ppm, but 25% of white tuna samples exceeded 0.5 ppm. Data suggest a slight increase in levels since 1991, and mercury levels were significantly higher in 2001 than in other years. The mean level of mercury in white tuna (mean 0.407 ppm) was significantly higher than the mean value of 0.17 ppm currently used by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in its risk assessment and public information. There were no significant differences in mercury levels in tuna packed in oil compared to water. Draining contents had no effect on mercury levels, and the fluid, both oil and water, contained little mercury. These data indicate that people who eat canned tuna frequently can choose light tuna and reduce their mercury intake. Canned mackerel had much lower levels of mercury than tuna. Since cans of white tuna frequently exceed the FDA's original action level of 0.5 ppm, it would be prudent to continue some systematic monitoring of the nation's canned fish supply, particularly as the targets of commercial fisheries inevitably change as certain stocks become depleted." @default.
• W2023205231 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023205231 creator A5029328190 @default.
• W2023205231 creator A5073488174 @default.
• W2023205231 date "2004-11-01" @default.
• W2023205231 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2023205231 title "Mercury in canned tuna: white versus light and temporal variation" @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1976384792 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1977324450 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1977428199 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1984301983 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1986632258 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1991013472 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1991548093 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1991880015 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1996947863 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1997500799 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W1999689534 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2004484435 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2009905367 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2013286176 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2013621713 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2014075451 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2018628382 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2019711905 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2031977499 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2032635061 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2034048877 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2043388543 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2045437271 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2047544218 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2048769717 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2050765051 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2061600617 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2061951872 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2064755830 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2068263777 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2068624523 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2070299858 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2070569308 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2075590966 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2079935957 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2081137904 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2093833082 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2093889044 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2097487142 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2120093288 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2120966663 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2125668466 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2131040926 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2131747196 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2139058590 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2163364223 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2170196247 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2330340734 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2336601384 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2421386262 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2472767499 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W2614236298 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W4229920050 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W4233011650 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W4240378450 @default.
• W2023205231 cites W4241104185 @default.
• W2023205231 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2003.12.001" @default.
• W2023205231 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15364590" @default.
• W2023205231 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2023205231 type Work @default.
• W2023205231 sameAs 2023205231 @default.
• W2023205231 citedByCount "146" @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312012 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312013 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312014 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312015 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312016 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312017 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312018 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312019 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312020 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312021 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312022 @default.
• W2023205231 countsByYear W20232052312023 @default.
• W2023205231 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023205231 hasAuthorship W2023205231A5029328190 @default.
• W2023205231 hasAuthorship W2023205231A5073488174 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C107872376 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C2777777548 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C2778327988 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C2779991348 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C2780127386 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C2780373914 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C2780532849 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C2909208804 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C33070731 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2023205231 hasConcept C41008148 @default.

• next