FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023236718> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023236718 endingPage "969" @default.
• W2023236718 startingPage "963" @default.
• W2023236718 abstract "Respiratory rate is an important sign that is commonly either not recorded or recorded incorrectly. Mobile phone ownership is increasing even in resource-poor settings. Phone applications may improve the accuracy and ease of counting of respiratory rates. The study assessed the reliability and initial users’ impressions of four mobile phone respiratory timer approaches, compared to a 60-second count by the same participants. Three mobile applications (applying four different counting approaches plus a standard 60-second count) were created using the Java Mobile Edition and tested on Nokia C1-01 phones. Apart from the 60-second timer application, the others included a counter based on the time for ten breaths, and three based on the time interval between breaths (‘Once-per-Breath’, in which the user presses for each breath and the application calculates the rate after 10 or 20 breaths, or after 60 s). Nursing and physiotherapy students used the applications to count respiratory rates in a set of brief video recordings of children with different respiratory illnesses. Limits of agreement (compared to the same participant's standard 60-second count), intra-class correlation coefficients and standard errors of measurement were calculated to compare the reliability of the four approaches, and a usability questionnaire was completed by the participants. There was considerable variation in the counts, with large components of the variation related to the participants and the videos, as well as the methods. None of the methods was entirely reliable, with no limits of agreement better than −10 to +9 breaths/min. Some of the methods were superior to the others, with ICCs from 0.24 to 0.92. By ICC the Once-per-Breath 60-second count and the Once-per-Breath 20-breath count were the most consistent, better even than the 60-second count by the participants. The 10-breath approaches performed least well. Users’ initial impressions were positive, with little difference between the applications found. This study provides evidence that applications running on simple phones can be used to count respiratory rates in children. The Once-per-Breath methods are the most reliable, outperforming the 60-second count. For children with raised respiratory rates the 20-breath version of the Once-per-Breath method is faster, so it is a more suitable option where health workers are under time pressure." @default.
• W2023236718 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023236718 creator A5028825450 @default.
• W2023236718 creator A5040081906 @default.
• W2023236718 creator A5046734542 @default.
• W2023236718 creator A5049932698 @default.
• W2023236718 creator A5052537138 @default.
• W2023236718 creator A5064608848 @default.
• W2023236718 creator A5070452918 @default.
• W2023236718 creator A5071792399 @default.
• W2023236718 date "2015-05-01" @default.
• W2023236718 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2023236718 title "Can simple mobile phone applications provide reliable counts of respiratory rates in sick infants and children? An initial evaluation of three new applications" @default.
• W2023236718 cites W1543453801 @default.
• W2023236718 cites W1983400986 @default.
• W2023236718 cites W2027129753 @default.
• W2023236718 cites W2069378996 @default.
• W2023236718 cites W2124381750 @default.
• W2023236718 cites W2141403362 @default.
• W2023236718 cites W2154099645 @default.
• W2023236718 cites W2165949663 @default.
• W2023236718 cites W3145690733 @default.
• W2023236718 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.01.016" @default.
• W2023236718 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25712876" @default.
• W2023236718 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2023236718 type Work @default.
• W2023236718 sameAs 2023236718 @default.
• W2023236718 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2023236718 countsByYear W20232367182015 @default.
• W2023236718 countsByYear W20232367182017 @default.
• W2023236718 countsByYear W20232367182018 @default.
• W2023236718 countsByYear W20232367182019 @default.
• W2023236718 countsByYear W20232367182020 @default.
• W2023236718 countsByYear W20232367182022 @default.
• W2023236718 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023236718 hasAuthorship W2023236718A5028825450 @default.
• W2023236718 hasAuthorship W2023236718A5040081906 @default.
• W2023236718 hasAuthorship W2023236718A5046734542 @default.
• W2023236718 hasAuthorship W2023236718A5049932698 @default.
• W2023236718 hasAuthorship W2023236718A5052537138 @default.
• W2023236718 hasAuthorship W2023236718A5064608848 @default.
• W2023236718 hasAuthorship W2023236718A5070452918 @default.
• W2023236718 hasAuthorship W2023236718A5071792399 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C2776633867 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C2777421447 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C2777953023 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C2778707766 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C555944384 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C8213797 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C105795698 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C107457646 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C121332964 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C126322002 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C138885662 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C163258240 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C170130773 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C22679943 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C2776633867 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C2777421447 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C2777953023 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C2778707766 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C33923547 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C40993552 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C41008148 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C41895202 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C43214815 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C555944384 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C62520636 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C71924100 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C76155785 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C8213797 @default.
• W2023236718 hasConceptScore W2023236718C84393581 @default.
• W2023236718 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2023236718 hasLocation W20232367181 @default.
• W2023236718 hasLocation W20232367182 @default.
• W2023236718 hasOpenAccess W2023236718 @default.
• W2023236718 hasPrimaryLocation W20232367181 @default.
• W2023236718 hasRelatedWork W1031622928 @default.
• W2023236718 hasRelatedWork W1459934432 @default.
• W2023236718 hasRelatedWork W2347554032 @default.
• W2023236718 hasRelatedWork W2350005463 @default.

• next