FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023261682> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023261682 abstract "To estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of microwave endometrial ablation (MEA) and thermal balloon endometrial ablation (TBEA) for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), compared with the existing (first-generation) endometrial ablation (EA) techniques of transcervical resection (TCRE) and rollerball (RB) ablation, and hysterectomy.Electronic databases, bibliographies of articles, and also experts in the field and relevant industry bodies were asked to provide information.A detailed search strategy was carried out to identify systematic reviews and controlled trials of MEA and TBEA versus first-generation techniques for EA. In addition to electronic database searching, reference lists were hand-searched and information sought from manufacturers of EA devices and by experts in the field. A deterministic Markov model was developed to assess cost-effectiveness. Data for the model were taken from a range of sources.The systematic review of first-generation EA techniques versus hysterectomy found that EA offered an alternative to hysterectomy for HMB, with fewer complications and a shorter recovery period. Satisfaction and effectiveness were high for both MEA and TBEA. Costs were lower with EA although the difference narrows over time. Second-generation EA techniques are an alternative treatment to first-generation techniques for HMB, and first-generation techniques are known to offer an alternative to hysterectomy. Although no trials of second-generation techniques and hysterectomy have been undertaken, it seems reasonable to assume that second-generation techniques also offer an alternative surgical treatment. Using the model to assess cost-effectiveness, costs were very slightly higher for MEA when compared to TBEA, and differences in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were negligible. For MEA compared with transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) and RB ablation, costs were slightly lower with MEA and MEA accrued very slightly more QALYs. Compared with hysterectomy, MEA costs less and accrues slightly fewer QALYs. For TBEA compared with TCRE and RB ablation, costs were lower with TBEA and TBEA accrued slightly more QALYs. Compared with hysterectomy, TBEA costs moderately less and accrues moderately fewer QALYs.Overall, there were few significant differences between the outcomes of first- and second-generation techniques including bleeding, satisfaction and QoL measures and repeat surgery rates. Second-generation techniques had significantly shorter operating and theatre times and there appear to be fewer serious perioperative adverse effects with second-generation techniques and postoperative effects are similar. Compared with hysterectomy, TCRE and RB are quicker to perform and result in shorter hospitalisation and faster return to work. Hysterectomy results in more adverse effects and is more expensive, although the need for retreatment leads this difference to decrease over time. Satisfaction with hysterectomy is initially higher, but there is no significant difference after 2 years. The economic model suggests that second-generation techniques are more cost-effective than first-generation techniques of EA for HMB. Both TBEA and MEA appear to be less costly than hysterectomy, although the latter results in more QALYs. Further research is suggested to make direct comparisons of the cost-effectiveness of second-generation EA techniques, to carry out longer term follow-up for all methods of EA in RCTs, and to develop more sophisticated modelling studies. Further research is also recommended into HMB to establish health-state utility values, its surgical treatment, convalescence, complications of treatment, symptoms and patient satisfaction." @default.
• W2023261682 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023261682 creator A5011994466 @default.
• W2023261682 creator A5012494940 @default.
• W2023261682 creator A5024451410 @default.
• W2023261682 creator A5043122363 @default.
• W2023261682 creator A5077362479 @default.
• W2023261682 date "2004-02-01" @default.
• W2023261682 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2023261682 title "The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of microwave and thermal balloon endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and economic modelling" @default.
• W2023261682 cites W2038994407 @default.
• W2023261682 cites W2056895439 @default.
• W2023261682 cites W2163213475 @default.
• W2023261682 cites W1899079722 @default.
• W2023261682 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/hta8030" @default.
• W2023261682 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14754561" @default.
• W2023261682 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2023261682 type Work @default.
• W2023261682 sameAs 2023261682 @default.
• W2023261682 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822013 @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822014 @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822015 @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822016 @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822017 @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822018 @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822019 @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822021 @default.
• W2023261682 countsByYear W20232616822022 @default.
• W2023261682 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023261682 hasAuthorship W2023261682A5011994466 @default.
• W2023261682 hasAuthorship W2023261682A5012494940 @default.
• W2023261682 hasAuthorship W2023261682A5024451410 @default.
• W2023261682 hasAuthorship W2023261682A5043122363 @default.
• W2023261682 hasAuthorship W2023261682A5077362479 @default.
• W2023261682 hasBestOaLocation W20232616821 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C139059822 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C2778937548 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C2779494336 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C112930515 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C126322002 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C139059822 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C141071460 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C17744445 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C189708586 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C19527891 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C199539241 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C2778902805 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C2778937548 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C2779473830 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C2779494336 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C3019080777 @default.
• W2023261682 hasConceptScore W2023261682C71924100 @default.
• W2023261682 hasFunder F4320334661 @default.
• W2023261682 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2023261682 hasLocation W20232616821 @default.
• W2023261682 hasLocation W20232616822 @default.
• W2023261682 hasOpenAccess W2023261682 @default.
• W2023261682 hasPrimaryLocation W20232616821 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W184539412 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W197185963 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W2001030069 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W2001148554 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W2047349811 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W2097912527 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W2110658075 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W2145949529 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W2225680293 @default.
• W2023261682 hasRelatedWork W2432939954 @default.
• W2023261682 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2023261682 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023261682 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023261682 magId "2023261682" @default.
• W2023261682 workType "article" @default.