FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023264659> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023264659 endingPage "1014" @default.
• W2023264659 startingPage "1005" @default.
• W2023264659 abstract "Intra-operative incidental contamination of surgical wounds is not rare. Povidone-iodine solution can be used to disinfect surgical wounds. Although povidone-iodine is a good broad-spectrum disinfecting agent, it has occasionally been reported to have a negative effect on wound healing and bone union. Therefore, its safety in a spinal surgery is unclear. A prospective, single-blinded, randomized study was accordingly conducted to evaluate the safety of povidone-iodine solution in spinal surgeries. Ascertained herein was the effect of wound irrigation with diluted povidone-iodine solution on wound healing, infection rate, fusion status and clinical outcome of spinal surgeries. Materials and methods: From January 2002 to August 2003, 244 consecutive cases undergoing primary instrumented lumbosacral posterolateral fusion due to degenerative spinal disorder with segmental instability had been collected and randomly divided into two groups: the study group (120 cases, 212 fusion levels) and the control group (124 cases, 223 fusion levels). Excluded were those patients with a prior spinal surgery, spinal trauma, malignant tumor, infectious spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, metabolic bone disease, skeletal immaturity or with an immunosuppressive treatment. In the former group, wounds were irrigated with 0.35% povidone-iodine solution followed by normal saline solution just before the bone-grafting and instrumentation procedure. However, only with normal saline solution in the latter. All the operations were done by the same surgeon with a standard technique. All the patients were treated in the same postoperative fashion as well. Later on, wound healing, infection rate, spinal bone fusion and clinical outcome were evaluated in both groups. Results: A significant improvement of back and leg pain scores, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association function scores (JOA) and ambulatory capacity have been observed in both groups. One hundred and seven patients in the study group and one hundred and nine in the control group achieved solid union. There was no infection in the study group but six deep infections in the control group. Wound dehiscence was noted in one group 1 and two group 2 patients. A subsequent statistical analysis revealed higher infection rate in the control group (P<0.05), but no significant difference in fusion rate, wound healing, improvement of pain score, function score and ambulatory capacity between the two groups. Conclusion: Diluted povidone-iodine solution can be used safely in spinal surgeries, and it will not influence wound healing, bone union and clinical outcome." @default.
• W2023264659 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023264659 creator A5002621141 @default.
• W2023264659 creator A5036154579 @default.
• W2023264659 creator A5042036960 @default.
• W2023264659 creator A5047107111 @default.
• W2023264659 creator A5067247931 @default.
• W2023264659 creator A5088014679 @default.
• W2023264659 date "2005-08-20" @default.
• W2023264659 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2023264659 title "Can povidone-iodine solution be used safely in a spinal surgery?" @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1561712970 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1622698 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W16623620 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1963729321 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1964411425 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1965303512 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1966935626 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1967025999 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1974311235 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1986532020 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1987956028 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W1999450610 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2000808789 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2001696158 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2002556026 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2010733339 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2015269879 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2017380863 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2024435056 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2024504959 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2025291768 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2031192024 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2035350015 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2037321670 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2037716466 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2039187928 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2048318327 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2048439487 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2056228557 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2060332941 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2067028423 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2068551192 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2078980438 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2089892622 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2111868516 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2164592554 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2170301140 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2184143792 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2220298494 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2234053167 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2410520346 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2419276808 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W2426760371 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W4230132221 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W4231546039 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W4240764867 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W4244923677 @default.
• W2023264659 cites W4303064865 @default.
• W2023264659 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0975-6" @default.
• W2023264659 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3489437" @default.
• W2023264659 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16133077" @default.
• W2023264659 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2023264659 type Work @default.
• W2023264659 sameAs 2023264659 @default.
• W2023264659 citedByCount "106" @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592012 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592013 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592014 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592015 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592016 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592017 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592018 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592019 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592020 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592021 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592022 @default.
• W2023264659 countsByYear W20232646592023 @default.
• W2023264659 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023264659 hasAuthorship W2023264659A5002621141 @default.
• W2023264659 hasAuthorship W2023264659A5036154579 @default.
• W2023264659 hasAuthorship W2023264659A5042036960 @default.
• W2023264659 hasAuthorship W2023264659A5047107111 @default.
• W2023264659 hasAuthorship W2023264659A5067247931 @default.
• W2023264659 hasAuthorship W2023264659A5088014679 @default.
• W2023264659 hasBestOaLocation W20232646592 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C2776337968 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C2777397205 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C2781438226 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C2994406423 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C7146039 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConceptScore W2023264659C141071460 @default.
• W2023264659 hasConceptScore W2023264659C2776337968 @default.

• next