FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023273104> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023273104 endingPage "269" @default.
• W2023273104 startingPage "255" @default.
• W2023273104 abstract "Purpose – The core of project management is the management of a temporary task, often with a high degree of uniqueness. The purpose of this paper is to address project management issues where another type of temporality also prevails; when external consultants on short-term contracts cooperate with the employees of the focal firm. The research question is: do external consultants and employees, working together on a project, engage in different or similar knowledge sharing behaviors? What are the impact of autonomous motivation, organizational support and trust on knowledge sharing? Design/methodology/approach – The empirical setting of the study is subsea activities, which is part the oil and gas industry in Norway. The respondents are regular employees with a permanent contract and external consultants employed by a third party; which is the most common external work arrangement in the industry. The sample consists of employees of a focal firm, external consultants of the focal firm and external consultants identified by their employer (two firms). The survey was administered by e-mail to 323 possible respondents. Of these, 268 were from the focal firm (194 employees and 74 external consultants), and 55 from the two consulting companies. After four weeks of collecting data, 138 responses had been registered. This is a response rate of 43 percent. The response rates were similar in the three categories. The survey was designed using Qualtrics, an online survey software tool and was administered by e-mail in the winter of 2012. Findings – The regression analysis found that there was no difference in knowledge sharing between employees and external consultants. Thus the empirical analysis supports the “project identity” hypothesis, rather than the “employment matters” hypothesis. Further, there were positive, significant impacts of autonomous motivation and perceived organizational support on knowledge sharing. The findings are similar across samples. R 2 is quite high in models B (0.447) and D (0.458), indicating that a large share of the variation in knowledge sharing is explained by the full model. Research limitations/implications – Based on the empirical study here, the “employment arrangement” thesis was not supported. The authors believe, however, that combining the two types of temporality (work organization and employment arrangement) is a promising area of exploration and it is not given that further studies will provide similar empirical findings. Further research should explore under what conditions employment arrangements have an impact on knowledge sharing. The research may be extended along three dimensions. First, the study of knowledge sharing when employees and external consultants work together (on projects managed by the focal firm) should be extended to include other firms, other types of competence as well as economic sectors outside petroleum. Second, research on employment arrangements in projects, should consider project contexts that are different from the type emphasized here, such as development projects and projects that have a fundamental inter-organizational character characterized by dual responsibility. Third, a number of others issues, in addition to knowledge sharing, are relevant. Combining the two aspects of temporality may provide opportunities for exploring the impact of organizational context in the field of leadership studies. Practical implications – Management should strive to increase autonomous motivation and provide organizational support for both employees and external consultants. It is possible to use external consultants without negative effects on the level of knowledge sharing. Managers should be aware of the challenges related to both types of temporality. Social implications – Increased awareness of the relevance of both types of temporality in contemporary working life. Originality/value – In previous research, project organization and temporary employment relations are two distinct areas. This is one of the first empirical studies that have analyzed both aspects of temporality. The paper contributes to the literature on antecedents of knowledge sharing in organizations, and suggest avenues for further research in this issue. Further, in addressing both types of temporality, a number of other research themes are suggested." @default.
• W2023273104 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023273104 creator A5023233126 @default.
• W2023273104 creator A5033779123 @default.
• W2023273104 date "2015-03-02" @default.
• W2023273104 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2023273104 title "Knowledge sharing in projects: does employment arrangement matter?" @default.
• W2023273104 cites W1546961816 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W1783775687 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W1971931485 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W1974197419 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W1980971826 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W1981960646 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W1983254849 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2013050706 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2020908180 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2025240966 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2028992555 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2038984978 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2039022103 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2056821160 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2065433609 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2078690141 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2089446880 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2100493403 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2122517769 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2124469445 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2136407476 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2150302031 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2153452286 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2168318626 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W2738862361 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W3125883484 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W4235604896 @default.
• W2023273104 cites W80961713 @default.
• W2023273104 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-11-2013-0203" @default.
• W2023273104 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2023273104 type Work @default.
• W2023273104 sameAs 2023273104 @default.
• W2023273104 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2023273104 countsByYear W20232731042015 @default.
• W2023273104 countsByYear W20232731042016 @default.
• W2023273104 countsByYear W20232731042018 @default.
• W2023273104 countsByYear W20232731042019 @default.
• W2023273104 countsByYear W20232731042020 @default.
• W2023273104 countsByYear W20232731042021 @default.
• W2023273104 countsByYear W20232731042022 @default.
• W2023273104 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023273104 hasAuthorship W2023273104A5023233126 @default.
• W2023273104 hasAuthorship W2023273104A5033779123 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C2776604539 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C59364581 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C127413603 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C144024400 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C144133560 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C162853370 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C17744445 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C185592680 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C18762648 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C198531522 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C2776604539 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C36289849 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C39549134 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C41008148 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C43617362 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C56739046 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C59364581 @default.
• W2023273104 hasConceptScore W2023273104C78519656 @default.
• W2023273104 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2023273104 hasLocation W20232731041 @default.
• W2023273104 hasOpenAccess W2023273104 @default.
• W2023273104 hasPrimaryLocation W20232731041 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W1515014615 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W2008810782 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W2086458419 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W2376024944 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W2398005955 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W2518615930 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W3021475143 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W3025474702 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W3122971585 @default.
• W2023273104 hasRelatedWork W4320059816 @default.
• W2023273104 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2023273104 isParatext "false" @default.

• next