FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023286141> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023286141 endingPage "355" @default.
• W2023286141 startingPage "345" @default.
• W2023286141 abstract "Intensive time-series designs for classroom investigations have been under development since 1975. Studies have been conducted to determine their feasibility (Mayer & Lewis, 1979), their potential for monitoring knowledge acquisition (Mayer & Kozlow, 1980), and the potential threat to validity of the frequency of testing inherent in the design (Mayer & Rojas, 1982). This study, an extension of those previous studies, is an attempt to determine the degree of discrimination the design allows in collecting data on achievement. It also serves as a replication of the Mayer and Kozlow study, an attempt to determine design validity for collecting achievement data. The investigator used her eighth-grade earth science students, from a suburban Columbus (Ohio) junior high school. A multiple-group single intervention time-series design (Glass, Willson, & Gottman, 1975) was adapted to the collection of daily data on achievement in the topic of the intervention, a unit on plate tectonics. Single multiple-choice items were randomly assigned to each of three groups of students, identified on the basis of their ranking on a written test of cognitive level (Lawson, 1978). The top third, or those with formal cognitive tendencies, were compared on the basis of knowledge achievement and understanding achievement with the lowest third of the students, or those with concrete cognitive tendencies, to determine if the data collected in the design would discriminate between the two groups. Several studies (Goodstein & Howe, 1978; Lawson & Renner, 1975) indicated that students with formal cognitive tendencies should learn a formal concept such as plate tectonics with greater understanding than should students with concrete cognitive tendencies. Analyses used were a comparison of regression lines in each of the three study stages: baseline, intervention, and follow-up; t-tests of means of days summed across each stage; and a time-series analysis program. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups both in slopes of regression lines (0.0001) and in t-tests (0.0005) on both knowledge and understanding levels of learning. These differences confirm the discrimination of the intensive time-series design in showing that it can distinguish differences in learning between students with formal cognitive tendencies and those with concrete cognitive tendencies. The time-series analysis model with a trend in the intervention was better than a model with no trend for both groups of students, in that it accounted for a greater amount of variance in the data from both knowledge and understanding levels of learning. This finding adds additional confidence in the validity of the design for obtaining achievement data. When the analysis model with trend was used on data from the group with formal cognitive tendencies, it accounted for a greater degree of variance than the same model applied to the data from the group with concrete cognitive tendencies. This more conservative analysis, therefor, gave results consistent with those from the more usual linear regression techniques and t-tests, further adding to the confidence in the discrimination of the design." @default.
• W2023286141 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023286141 creator A5031466287 @default.
• W2023286141 creator A5089449787 @default.
• W2023286141 date "1984-04-01" @default.
• W2023286141 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2023286141 title "An assessment of the validity and discrimination of the intensive time-series design by monitoring learning differences between students with different cognitive tendencies" @default.
• W2023286141 cites W1964652761 @default.
• W2023286141 cites W1970617173 @default.
• W2023286141 cites W1972861431 @default.
• W2023286141 cites W2057770239 @default.
• W2023286141 cites W2130977843 @default.
• W2023286141 cites W2137085500 @default.
• W2023286141 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210402" @default.
• W2023286141 hasPublicationYear "1984" @default.
• W2023286141 type Work @default.
• W2023286141 sameAs 2023286141 @default.
• W2023286141 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2023286141 countsByYear W20232861412015 @default.
• W2023286141 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023286141 hasAuthorship W2023286141A5031466287 @default.
• W2023286141 hasAuthorship W2023286141A5089449787 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C203151758 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C2781206393 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C81369262 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C145420912 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C151730666 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C154945302 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C15744967 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C169760540 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C169900460 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C189430467 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C203151758 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C2777267654 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C2781206393 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C41008148 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C81369262 @default.
• W2023286141 hasConceptScore W2023286141C86803240 @default.
• W2023286141 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2023286141 hasLocation W20232861411 @default.
• W2023286141 hasOpenAccess W2023286141 @default.
• W2023286141 hasPrimaryLocation W20232861411 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W1488471087 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W2024165873 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W2185748377 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W2354509678 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W2770347124 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W27803997 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W2792085915 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W3211271889 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W4310470398 @default.
• W2023286141 hasRelatedWork W4320493224 @default.
• W2023286141 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2023286141 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023286141 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023286141 magId "2023286141" @default.
• W2023286141 workType "article" @default.