Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023341633> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 93 of
93
with 100 items per page.
- W2023341633 endingPage "201" @default.
- W2023341633 startingPage "192" @default.
- W2023341633 abstract "Two classes of second graders of average and above-average mathematics ability were taught to use differing schematic drawings to represent differing categories of addition and subtraction word problems. Children entered the three-digit numbers used in the problems into the schematic drawings and then were to use the drawings to facilitate the choice of the solution procedure. The children were able to make the correct drawing for a given category, usually inserted the numbers from the problem into a schematic drawing correctly, and usually selected the correct solution strategy for the problem. There was little support for the hypotheses that children use a single part-part-whole schema to solve either all categories of problems or the more difficult Change problems. The most difficult problems were those in which the underlying semantic subtractive problem category (Change-Get-Less and Compare) conflicted with the addition solution strategy required to solve the problem. The good-to-excellent posttest performance on most of the possible kinds of addition and subtraction word problems indicates that most of these problems are within the zone of proximal development of second graders of average and above-average mathematics ability. Thus American textbooks can include many of the more difficult word problems, as do textbooks in the Soviet Union. Solving addition and subtraction word problems involves at least three aspects: representing the word problem situation, selecting a solution strategy, and using the solution strategy to find the answer. Initially, children solve word problems by representing the problem with concrete objects and then using these objects to carry out the solution strategy (Briars & Larkin, 1984; Carpenter & Moser, 1984; Fuson, 1988; Riley, Greeno, & Heller, 1983). Later, children solve problems by using more sophisticated counting strategies that also are directly derived from the representation of the problem situation (Carpenter & Moser, 1984; Fuson, 1988). Finally, children solve problems by choosing an arithmetic operation (addition or subtraction) and then using some particular method of adding or subtracting such as thinking strategies, known facts, or the multidigit addition or subtraction algorithms (Carpenter & Moser, 1984; Fuson, 1988). Thus the first two aspects of problem solving may be merged for small numbers or simple types of problems, but they are separate for large numbers because these require the choice of an algorithm. The most common method of teaching addition and subtraction word problems ignores children's need to represent the problem situation and instead focuses only on the solution strategy: Children are taught to write a solution addition or subtraction sentence (e.g., 8 + 5 = ? or 8 - 5 = ?) for a problem and then are to write the answer for the sentence. The disadvantage of this approach is particularly strong for the more complex kinds of word problems, for these require not only that children represent a problem but also that they" @default.
- W2023341633 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2023341633 creator A5005857379 @default.
- W2023341633 creator A5023027192 @default.
- W2023341633 date "1988-06-01" @default.
- W2023341633 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2023341633 title "Teaching children to use schematic drawings to solve addition and subtraction word problems." @default.
- W2023341633 cites W103996110 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W1543972770 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W1556200800 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W1738097990 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W1971090540 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W1983627498 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W1996057931 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2009862599 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2013832765 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2016550977 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2092771413 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2237157017 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2526772453 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2729972328 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2989196889 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W562127744 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W626922200 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2043608708 @default.
- W2023341633 cites W2090639711 @default.
- W2023341633 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.192" @default.
- W2023341633 hasPublicationYear "1988" @default.
- W2023341633 type Work @default.
- W2023341633 sameAs 2023341633 @default.
- W2023341633 citedByCount "85" @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332012 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332013 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332014 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332015 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332016 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332017 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332018 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332019 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332020 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332021 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332022 @default.
- W2023341633 countsByYear W20233416332023 @default.
- W2023341633 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2023341633 hasAuthorship W2023341633A5005857379 @default.
- W2023341633 hasAuthorship W2023341633A5023027192 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C192328126 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C24326235 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C68060419 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C88610354 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C90805587 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConcept C94375191 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C127413603 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C138885662 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C145420912 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C15744967 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C180747234 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C192328126 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C24326235 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C33923547 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C41895202 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C68060419 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C88610354 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C90805587 @default.
- W2023341633 hasConceptScore W2023341633C94375191 @default.
- W2023341633 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2023341633 hasLocation W20233416331 @default.
- W2023341633 hasOpenAccess W2023341633 @default.
- W2023341633 hasPrimaryLocation W20233416331 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W14893772 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W1987972590 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W2075287749 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W2217463823 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W2761970336 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W321050180 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W342986969 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W4310024312 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W4362473794 @default.
- W2023341633 hasRelatedWork W18186961 @default.
- W2023341633 hasVolume "80" @default.
- W2023341633 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2023341633 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2023341633 magId "2023341633" @default.
- W2023341633 workType "article" @default.