FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023383989> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023383989 endingPage "383" @default.
• W2023383989 startingPage "382" @default.
• W2023383989 abstract "We are pleased, but not surprised, that the reanalysis of the National Cancer Institute study by Walker, et al,' has yielded the same findings that we reported2 3. Our preliminary analysis showed no evidence of any association between bladder cancer and consumption of artificial sweeteners (AS) in the total study population. However, we noted a slight tendency toward increased with increased intensity of use (amount of AS used daily); this trend was much more prominent in the two subgroups chosen before the start of the study for particular attention, i.e., nonsmoking females and heavy-smoking males. Walker and his colleagues, using a slightly different statistical methodology, has faithfully reproduced these results. Our interpretation of these results was that past AS use has had a minimal effect, if any, on bladder cancer rates. We reported that inconsistencies in the data suggest that the positive associations may be due to chance, but that it is noteworthy that the subgroups were chosen, a priori, to test hypotheses derived from laboratory experiments.3 The Walker interpretation resembles ours, although some differences exist. We feel that either a causal association or chance may be responsible for the positive findings in the subgroups, while the Walker research team favors chance as the explanation. We do not agree with their argument against a causal interpretation based on a risk score analysis of our data. Indeed, the findings from two other studies4,5 suggest that a causal explanation cannot yet be dismissed. Walker, et al, claim that control for a variety offactors through multivariate techniques diminished the plausibility of earlier interpretations of the subgroup findings. This apparently refers to the lack of any evidence of a relationship between and intensity of AS use in either the lowest or highest risk category, with the groups defined on the basis of a multivariate risk score. Although this is apparently at odds with the associations seen in our defined high-risk and low-risk groups, the observations are actually compatible with each other. We chose non-smoking, non-occupationally exposed females a priori because their baseline of bladder cancer is low and there were enough cases to evaluate the effect of AS use. Similarly, we chose heavysmoking males as a high-risk group a priori. Evaluation of the bladder cancer risks of these two groups after the data were collected verified these designations. The baseline" @default.
• W2023383989 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023383989 creator A5014665420 @default.
• W2023383989 creator A5072090834 @default.
• W2023383989 date "1982-04-01" @default.
• W2023383989 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2023383989 title "Non-nutritive sweeteners and bladder cancer." @default.
• W2023383989 cites W1495536526 @default.
• W2023383989 cites W2071036678 @default.
• W2023383989 cites W2089737756 @default.
• W2023383989 cites W2092248609 @default.
• W2023383989 doi "https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.72.4.382" @default.
• W2023383989 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1649890" @default.
• W2023383989 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7065316" @default.
• W2023383989 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
• W2023383989 type Work @default.
• W2023383989 sameAs 2023383989 @default.
• W2023383989 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2023383989 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023383989 hasAuthorship W2023383989A5014665420 @default.
• W2023383989 hasAuthorship W2023383989A5072090834 @default.
• W2023383989 hasBestOaLocation W20233839892 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C2777108408 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C2779147919 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C2780352672 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C2909709979 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C2911055575 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C121608353 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C126322002 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C2777108408 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C2779147919 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C2780352672 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C2909709979 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C2911055575 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C31903555 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C71924100 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C86803240 @default.
• W2023383989 hasConceptScore W2023383989C99454951 @default.
• W2023383989 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2023383989 hasLocation W20233839891 @default.
• W2023383989 hasLocation W20233839892 @default.
• W2023383989 hasLocation W20233839893 @default.
• W2023383989 hasOpenAccess W2023383989 @default.
• W2023383989 hasPrimaryLocation W20233839891 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W1984360404 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W1988607134 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W2032606417 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W2121912756 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W2266868649 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W2407342317 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W2416676486 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W2441168711 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W2936610766 @default.
• W2023383989 hasRelatedWork W4299422382 @default.
• W2023383989 hasVolume "72" @default.
• W2023383989 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023383989 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023383989 magId "2023383989" @default.
• W2023383989 workType "article" @default.