FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023391639> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023391639 endingPage "1004" @default.
• W2023391639 startingPage "993" @default.
• W2023391639 abstract "Cost utility analysis is the preferred method of analysis when quality of life instead is an important outcome of the project being appraised. However, there are several methodological issues to be resolved in implementing cost utility analysis, including whether to use generalised measures or direct disease specific outcome assessment, the choice of measurement technique, and the combination of different health states. Screening for breast cancer meets this criterion as mammographic screening has been shown to reduce mortality; and it is said that earlier treatment frequently results in less radical surgery so that women are offered the additional benefit of improved quality of life. Australia, like many other countries, has been debating whether to introduce a national mammographic screening programme. This paper presents the results of a cost utility analysis of breast cancer screening using an approach to measuring outcome, Healthy Year Equivalents, developed within this study to resolve these problems. Descriptions of breast cancer quality of life were developed from surveys of women with breast cancer, health professionals and the published literature. The time trade off technique was then used to derive values for breast cancer treatment outcomes in a survey of women in Sydney, Australia. Respondents included women with breast cancer and women who had not had breast cancer. Testing of (i) the effect of prognosis on the value attached to a health scenario; and (ii) whether the value attached to a health scenario remains constant over time has been reported. The estimate of the net costs of screening are reported. The costs of breast cancer screening include the screening programme itself, the further investigations and the subsequent treatment of breast cancer cases. Breast cancer is treated in the absence of screening, many commentators claim earlier treatment is costly but there is little evidence. Therefore we have investigated current patterns of breast cancer treatment, current use of investigations for women presenting with symptoms and current use of covert mammography screening. The results are extrapolated to obtain estimates of the costs and outcomes presented as cost per healthy year equivalent. This analysis produces important information for the Australian policy debate over mammography. It also contributes to the development of cost utility analysis and the approach developed here can be applied more generally." @default.
• W2023391639 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023391639 creator A5033211822 @default.
• W2023391639 creator A5038269429 @default.
• W2023391639 creator A5051790916 @default.
• W2023391639 creator A5058504563 @default.
• W2023391639 date "1992-05-01" @default.
• W2023391639 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2023391639 title "A cost utility analysis of mammography screening in Australia" @default.
• W2023391639 cites W1537598136 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W162661570 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W1881225095 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W1981417201 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W1992626840 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W1994552410 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2001043801 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2015000298 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2015278915 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2022108757 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2023183328 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2023833931 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2034450578 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2036394102 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2037761530 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2042851550 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2047174296 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2073648583 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2084034970 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2090656394 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2092198319 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2095876860 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2111923167 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2137292463 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2414569936 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2416239126 @default.
• W2023391639 cites W2460259719 @default.
• W2023391639 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90130-i" @default.
• W2023391639 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1631612" @default.
• W2023391639 hasPublicationYear "1992" @default.
• W2023391639 type Work @default.
• W2023391639 sameAs 2023391639 @default.
• W2023391639 citedByCount "129" @default.
• W2023391639 countsByYear W20233916392012 @default.
• W2023391639 countsByYear W20233916392013 @default.
• W2023391639 countsByYear W20233916392014 @default.
• W2023391639 countsByYear W20233916392016 @default.
• W2023391639 countsByYear W20233916392017 @default.
• W2023391639 countsByYear W20233916392018 @default.
• W2023391639 countsByYear W20233916392019 @default.
• W2023391639 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023391639 hasAuthorship W2023391639A5033211822 @default.
• W2023391639 hasAuthorship W2023391639A5038269429 @default.
• W2023391639 hasAuthorship W2023391639A5051790916 @default.
• W2023391639 hasAuthorship W2023391639A5058504563 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C127454912 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C184834754 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C2778491387 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C64332521 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C112930515 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C121608353 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C126322002 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C127454912 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C159110408 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C184834754 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C18903297 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C2778491387 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C2779951463 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C2780472235 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C29456083 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C3019080777 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C512399662 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C530470458 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C64332521 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C71924100 @default.
• W2023391639 hasConceptScore W2023391639C86803240 @default.
• W2023391639 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2023391639 hasLocation W20233916391 @default.
• W2023391639 hasLocation W20233916392 @default.
• W2023391639 hasOpenAccess W2023391639 @default.
• W2023391639 hasPrimaryLocation W20233916391 @default.
• W2023391639 hasRelatedWork W1020662891 @default.
• W2023391639 hasRelatedWork W1971803455 @default.
• W2023391639 hasRelatedWork W2023391639 @default.
• W2023391639 hasRelatedWork W2041820331 @default.
• W2023391639 hasRelatedWork W2120803900 @default.

• next