Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023392793> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 47 of
47
with 100 items per page.
- W2023392793 abstract "In the preface to the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason Kant explicitly states that his motivation for writing this work is to make room for faith or the practical employment of reason (Bxxv, xxx). How does Kant accomplish this? The topics of God and the immortality of the soul do not arise until the conclusion of the antinomies. How does Kant get from the desire to make room for faith to its fulfilment in the latter parts of the first Critique ? A common response to this question is a discussion of the constitutive and regulative employment of the ideas of reason. It is this distinction that sustains Kant's attempt at reconciling empirical knowledge and moral discourse. The constitutive and regulative analysis, however, has its roots deep within the initial stages of the Critique of Pure Reason . It is, in fact, the mathematical/dynamical distinction, which Kant introduces early in the analytic, that makes possible the constitutive/regulative distinction. Not only has the mathematical/ dynamical distinction itself been disregarded, but the relation between the mathematical/dynamical and the constitutive/ regulative has been almost universally ignored by commentators. If a commentator does mention the mathematical/dynamical distinction, it is usually in a dismissive tone. Walsh, for example, calls the distinction ‘hard to interpret’ and ignores it for the rest of his commentary." @default.
- W2023392793 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2023392793 creator A5035456880 @default.
- W2023392793 date "1999-03-01" @default.
- W2023392793 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2023392793 title "The Satisfaction of Reason: The Mathematical/Dynamical Distinction in the Critique of Pure Reason" @default.
- W2023392793 cites W620907363 @default.
- W2023392793 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415400000340" @default.
- W2023392793 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
- W2023392793 type Work @default.
- W2023392793 sameAs 2023392793 @default.
- W2023392793 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2023392793 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2023392793 hasAuthorship W2023392793A5035456880 @default.
- W2023392793 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2023392793 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2023392793 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2023392793 hasConceptScore W2023392793C111472728 @default.
- W2023392793 hasConceptScore W2023392793C138885662 @default.
- W2023392793 hasConceptScore W2023392793C15744967 @default.
- W2023392793 hasLocation W20233927931 @default.
- W2023392793 hasOpenAccess W2023392793 @default.
- W2023392793 hasPrimaryLocation W20233927931 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W1009933050 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W112719159 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W1825497426 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W1968965734 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W1969518670 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2003847913 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2027873767 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2104665174 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2131843445 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2188092927 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2196224811 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2215785125 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2321643860 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2492077792 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2750853994 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2751421959 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W2765538024 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W3008589514 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W3100163245 @default.
- W2023392793 hasRelatedWork W32604864 @default.
- W2023392793 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2023392793 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2023392793 magId "2023392793" @default.
- W2023392793 workType "article" @default.