FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023531284> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023531284 endingPage "147" @default.
• W2023531284 startingPage "147" @default.
• W2023531284 abstract "One of the most hotly contested issues on America's college campuses today is the preservation of Western civilization in the minds of students via the infusion of the literature and history of Ancient Greece and Rome and western Europe. As two best-selling books, Cultural Literacy (Hirsch, 1987) and The Closing of the American Mind (Bloom, 1987) contend, America's youth are out of touch with this cultural heritage. Both Hirsch and Bloom raise this point without acknowledging the decidedly ethnocentric view of traditional Western civilization. Their works sparked a heated debate in 1988 on the campus of Stanford University which resulted in that university's faculty senate approving a Culture and Values core curriculum that included works from non-White and female authors. The controversy was further heightened when then-Secretary of Education William Bennett traveled to Stanford to denounce this curriculum decision himself. The Western civilization controversy at Stanford is emblematic of the wars being waged throughout the country on several fronts. For example, a group calling itself the National Association of Scholars carried a full-page advertisement in The Chronicle of Higher Education (November 8, 1989, p. A-23) which urged no retreat from the sacred canon; yet, using recent results of history and literature tests from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, Ravitch and Finn (1987) underscore how little of the classical Eurocentric canon America's 17year-olds actually know. The state of California's history/social science curriculum framework (whose principal author was Ravitch) was lauded as an excellent example of the grand narrative of history to which all students should have access (Alexander & Crabtree, 1988), while a New York State Department of Education report calling for a Curriculum of Inclusion was denounced by defenders of the Eurocentric canon for bowing to the of Blacks, Latinos, and other minorities (Leo, 1989). Purportedly, all this fighting over the curriculum is a reaction to the fragmented, cafeteria-style curriculum that emerged during the 1960s as a result of civil rights, antiwar, and women's rights advocates' demands for a more relevant and representative education. The conservative argument alleges that these special interests groups, with their ethnic studies and women's studies course requirements, have pulled the curriculum in so many directions that for two decades American students somehow" @default.
• W2023531284 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023531284 creator A5034041401 @default.
• W2023531284 date "1991-01-01" @default.
• W2023531284 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2023531284 title "Beyond Multicultural Illiteracy" @default.
• W2023531284 cites W1483427038 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W1529989342 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W1559468026 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W168509312 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W1997236818 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W2110405233 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W2159548188 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W233782357 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W251136700 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W263698386 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W268990560 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W2724733510 @default.
• W2023531284 cites W631976908 @default.
• W2023531284 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/2295606" @default.
• W2023531284 hasPublicationYear "1991" @default.
• W2023531284 type Work @default.
• W2023531284 sameAs 2023531284 @default.
• W2023531284 citedByCount "67" @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842012 @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842013 @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842014 @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842015 @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842016 @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842017 @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842018 @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842019 @default.
• W2023531284 countsByYear W20235312842020 @default.
• W2023531284 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023531284 hasAuthorship W2023531284A5034041401 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConcept C165205368 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConcept C2777301881 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConcept C542530943 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConceptScore W2023531284C144024400 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConceptScore W2023531284C15744967 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConceptScore W2023531284C165205368 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConceptScore W2023531284C17744445 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConceptScore W2023531284C19417346 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConceptScore W2023531284C199539241 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConceptScore W2023531284C2777301881 @default.
• W2023531284 hasConceptScore W2023531284C542530943 @default.
• W2023531284 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2023531284 hasLocation W20235312841 @default.
• W2023531284 hasOpenAccess W2023531284 @default.
• W2023531284 hasPrimaryLocation W20235312841 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W1965810949 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W1982392063 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W1991095122 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W2058985112 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W2116405678 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W2345033884 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W2370014509 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2023531284 hasRelatedWork W3216559292 @default.
• W2023531284 hasVolume "60" @default.
• W2023531284 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023531284 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023531284 magId "2023531284" @default.
• W2023531284 workType "article" @default.