FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023558406> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023558406 endingPage "164" @default.
• W2023558406 startingPage "157" @default.
• W2023558406 abstract "Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the psychometric evidence relating to Constant-Murley score. Materials and methods A search of 3 databases (Medline, CINAHL, and EMBASE) and a manual search yielded 35 relevant publications. Pairs of raters used structured tools to analyze these articles, through critical appraisal and data extraction. A descriptive synthesis of the psychometric evidence was then performed. Results Quality ratings of 23% of the studies reviewed reached a level of 75% or higher. Studies evaluating the content validity of the Constant-Murley score suggest that the description in the original publication is insufficient to accomplish standardization between centers and evaluators. Despite this limitation, the Constant-Murley score correlates strongly (≥ 0.70) with shoulder-specific questionnaires, reaches acceptable benchmarks (ρ > 0.80) for its reliability coefficients, and is responsive (effect sizes and standardized response mean > 0.80) for detecting improvement after intervention in a variety of shoulder pathologies. Discussion This systematic review provides evidence to support the use of the Constant-Murley score for specific clinical and research applications but underscores the need for greater standardization and precaution when interpreting scores. Methods to improve standardization and measurement precision are needed. Responsiveness has been shown to be excellent, but some properties still need be evaluated, particularly those related to the absolute errors of measurement and minimal clinically important difference. Conclusion Given the widespread acceptance for usage of the Constant-Murley score in clinical studies and early indications that the measure is responsive, studies defining more rigid standardization of the tools/procedures are needed. Level of evidence Level 1 The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the psychometric evidence relating to Constant-Murley score. A search of 3 databases (Medline, CINAHL, and EMBASE) and a manual search yielded 35 relevant publications. Pairs of raters used structured tools to analyze these articles, through critical appraisal and data extraction. A descriptive synthesis of the psychometric evidence was then performed. Quality ratings of 23% of the studies reviewed reached a level of 75% or higher. Studies evaluating the content validity of the Constant-Murley score suggest that the description in the original publication is insufficient to accomplish standardization between centers and evaluators. Despite this limitation, the Constant-Murley score correlates strongly (≥ 0.70) with shoulder-specific questionnaires, reaches acceptable benchmarks (ρ > 0.80) for its reliability coefficients, and is responsive (effect sizes and standardized response mean > 0.80) for detecting improvement after intervention in a variety of shoulder pathologies. This systematic review provides evidence to support the use of the Constant-Murley score for specific clinical and research applications but underscores the need for greater standardization and precaution when interpreting scores. Methods to improve standardization and measurement precision are needed. Responsiveness has been shown to be excellent, but some properties still need be evaluated, particularly those related to the absolute errors of measurement and minimal clinically important difference. Given the widespread acceptance for usage of the Constant-Murley score in clinical studies and early indications that the measure is responsive, studies defining more rigid standardization of the tools/procedures are needed." @default.
• W2023558406 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023558406 creator A5033822760 @default.
• W2023558406 creator A5062241157 @default.
• W2023558406 creator A5086515310 @default.
• W2023558406 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2023558406 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2023558406 title "A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score" @default.
• W2023558406 cites W1488951335 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W1891903426 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W1965643674 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W1973373847 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W1975725147 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W1979972250 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W1980375853 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W1997489546 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2006223551 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2011822451 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2013621395 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2021033921 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2024150009 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2027792452 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2028259243 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2035274027 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2059529263 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2064779660 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2066006475 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2068672313 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2073984195 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2088036950 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2088162130 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2091266737 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2100262843 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2102963604 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2110498677 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2111964761 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2120927922 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2121672379 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2133449636 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2136649473 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2137536074 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W2791734449 @default.
• W2023558406 cites W4234424000 @default.
• W2023558406 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.008" @default.
• W2023558406 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19559630" @default.
• W2023558406 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2023558406 type Work @default.
• W2023558406 sameAs 2023558406 @default.
• W2023558406 citedByCount "177" @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062012 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062013 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062014 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062015 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062016 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062017 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062018 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062019 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062020 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062021 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062022 @default.
• W2023558406 countsByYear W20235584062023 @default.
• W2023558406 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023558406 hasAuthorship W2023558406A5033822760 @default.
• W2023558406 hasAuthorship W2023558406A5062241157 @default.
• W2023558406 hasAuthorship W2023558406A5086515310 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C111278954 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C188087704 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C2777466982 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C111278954 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C111919701 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C118552586 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C121332964 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C141071460 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C142724271 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C152541439 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C163258240 @default.
• W2023558406 hasConceptScore W2023558406C168563851 @default.

• next