FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023571605> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023571605 endingPage "704" @default.
• W2023571605 startingPage "700" @default.
• W2023571605 abstract "Purpose Repair of both flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendons is commonly performed in zone II flexor tendon injuries; however, the bulk of the repair may impair tendon gliding. We evaluated whether repairing 1 slip of FDS tendon and resecting the other would significantly decrease work of flexion and whether suture material affected this interaction in an in vitro study. Methods The index, middle, and ring fingers from 10 fresh-frozen human cadaveric hands were disarticulated and their tendon sheaths opened. Baseline work of flexion was tested. Lacerations were made in zone II, and then the FDP tendon was repaired with 3 different suture materials: FiberWire, Ticron, and prolene. Work of flexion was again measured and the percentage increase calculated. Further iterations were performed with both slips of FDS tendon repaired and with one slip of FDS tendon repaired and the other resected. Results There was no significant difference in the work of flexion after repairs done with FiberWire, Ticron, or Prolene. Work of flexion after repair of both FDP and FDS tendons increased 51% compared with an increase of 21% after FDP-only repair and an increase of 9% after repair of one and resection of the other slip of FDS. Repair of both FDP and FDS tendons significantly increased work of flexion. Conclusions Resection of 1 slip of FDS tendon significantly reduces work of flexion in zone II flexor tendon repair. Suture material had no effect on this interaction. Repair of both flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendons is commonly performed in zone II flexor tendon injuries; however, the bulk of the repair may impair tendon gliding. We evaluated whether repairing 1 slip of FDS tendon and resecting the other would significantly decrease work of flexion and whether suture material affected this interaction in an in vitro study. The index, middle, and ring fingers from 10 fresh-frozen human cadaveric hands were disarticulated and their tendon sheaths opened. Baseline work of flexion was tested. Lacerations were made in zone II, and then the FDP tendon was repaired with 3 different suture materials: FiberWire, Ticron, and prolene. Work of flexion was again measured and the percentage increase calculated. Further iterations were performed with both slips of FDS tendon repaired and with one slip of FDS tendon repaired and the other resected. There was no significant difference in the work of flexion after repairs done with FiberWire, Ticron, or Prolene. Work of flexion after repair of both FDP and FDS tendons increased 51% compared with an increase of 21% after FDP-only repair and an increase of 9% after repair of one and resection of the other slip of FDS. Repair of both FDP and FDS tendons significantly increased work of flexion. Resection of 1 slip of FDS tendon significantly reduces work of flexion in zone II flexor tendon repair. Suture material had no effect on this interaction." @default.
• W2023571605 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023571605 creator A5001655993 @default.
• W2023571605 creator A5005504457 @default.
• W2023571605 creator A5028404224 @default.
• W2023571605 date "2009-04-01" @default.
• W2023571605 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2023571605 title "Work of Flexion Related to Different Suture Materials After Flexor Digitorum Profundus and Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendon Repair in Zone II: A Biomechanical Study" @default.
• W2023571605 cites W1895731102 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W1967643924 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W1989365822 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W1991339213 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W1996876246 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W1999334083 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2009096558 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2019533319 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2042996281 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2051846202 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2071337434 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2082978196 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2091197223 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2117028371 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2144208159 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2144935370 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2151069123 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2152899711 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W2203691 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W4248193027 @default.
• W2023571605 cites W4252586110 @default.
• W2023571605 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.003" @default.
• W2023571605 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19345873" @default.
• W2023571605 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2023571605 type Work @default.
• W2023571605 sameAs 2023571605 @default.
• W2023571605 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2023571605 countsByYear W20235716052012 @default.
• W2023571605 countsByYear W20235716052013 @default.
• W2023571605 countsByYear W20235716052014 @default.
• W2023571605 countsByYear W20235716052015 @default.
• W2023571605 countsByYear W20235716052016 @default.
• W2023571605 countsByYear W20235716052019 @default.
• W2023571605 countsByYear W20235716052021 @default.
• W2023571605 countsByYear W20235716052022 @default.
• W2023571605 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023571605 hasAuthorship W2023571605A5001655993 @default.
• W2023571605 hasAuthorship W2023571605A5005504457 @default.
• W2023571605 hasAuthorship W2023571605A5028404224 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C2776454340 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C2780105995 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C2910165411 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C2911014463 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C105702510 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C141071460 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C175696284 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C2776454340 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C2777327002 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C2780105995 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C2910165411 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C2911014463 @default.
• W2023571605 hasConceptScore W2023571605C71924100 @default.
• W2023571605 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2023571605 hasLocation W20235716051 @default.
• W2023571605 hasLocation W20235716052 @default.
• W2023571605 hasOpenAccess W2023571605 @default.
• W2023571605 hasPrimaryLocation W20235716051 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W1978607457 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W1991600967 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W2023571605 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W2040348374 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W2047128716 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W2096681745 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W2618455666 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W2724723947 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W2941315676 @default.
• W2023571605 hasRelatedWork W4301489211 @default.
• W2023571605 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2023571605 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023571605 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023571605 magId "2023571605" @default.
• W2023571605 workType "article" @default.