FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W202365784> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W202365784 endingPage "8" @default.
• W202365784 startingPage "13" @default.
• W202365784 abstract "the field of health research, good governance has two primary goals: to ensure that the research conducted is scientifically valid, and that it is conducted in an ethical manner, protecting the physical and psychological integrity of the research participant. Since the emergence of research ethics boards (REBs) in Canada, responsibility for good governance is too often conflated with the responsibility for research review. Ideally, however, good governance results from an assumption of obligations by all those engaged in the research enterprise. Research ethics boards are not the sole repository of this responsibility. As a recent statement by medical journal editors pointed out: In return for the altruism and trust that make clinical research possible, the research enterprise has an obligation to conduct research ethically and to report it honestly. (1) This statement applies not only to clinical research but equally to all types of research involving humans. The first goal of this paper is therefore to identify the actors who make up the research enterprise and, very briefly, to sketch the nature of the role that each of them may play in the good governance of research involving humans. Some of these obligations are set by statute or regulation, some by ethics policies or guidelines. I will then consider which of these ethical obligations may constitute a duty of care under the common law. (2) Finally, I will briefly discuss how ethics policies, guidelines and practices can be integrated into or adopted by the legal system through incorporation into statutes and regulations or by judicial interpretation. Through such integration, they can help to establish the standard of care that defines the nature and extent of these legal duties. The Research Enterprise For the purposes of this very brief article, I will simply list the range of actors in the research enterprise and sketch in point form some of their diverse obligations for the proper conduct of health research involving humans. This by no means exhaustive list permits a preliminary consideration of which of these obligations may form the basis for a legal duty of care. 1. The Researcher * Conducts the research, and is therefore directly responsible for the welfare of the participant. * Is responsible for conducting the research in accordance with the protocol as designed, and as approved by any review body; the researcher is therefore accountable not only to the participant but also to the designer of the protocol (if the researcher did not design it him/herself), to the sponsor of the research, to the review body, and to any regulatory body. 2. The Research Sponsor * Funds the research and is therefore responsible for ensuring that the research is both scientifically and ethically valid, respects applicable laws and regulations and follows relevant policy guidelines. * Where the sponsor is a public body, it must also consider whether the proposed research serves the public interest. * Sponsors have an obligation to make the results of trials publicly available, so that the scientific community and ultimately, society in general, may benefit from the knowledge acquired through the unpaid participation of members of the public. 3. The Research Institution * Institutions where research involving humans is conducted have an obligation to the participants to ensure that the research is both valid and ethical; they also owe this obligation to the general public, as trust in the review process builds faith in the research enterprise, without which many people would not agree to participate in research. * Research institutions also have an obligation to ensure that their employees and those carrying out research on their premises, or using their name (and reputation) conduct themselves in accordance with institutional policies and ethical standards. …" @default.
• W202365784 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W202365784 creator A5044588750 @default.
• W202365784 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W202365784 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W202365784 title "Translating ethics into law: duties of care in health research involving humans." @default.
• W202365784 cites W3121168900 @default.
• W202365784 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16459410" @default.
• W202365784 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W202365784 type Work @default.
• W202365784 sameAs 202365784 @default.
• W202365784 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W202365784 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W202365784 hasAuthorship W202365784A5044588750 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C153997805 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C2776218876 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C2778447849 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C2779103253 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W202365784 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C10138342 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C127413603 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C144024400 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C144133560 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C153997805 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C17319257 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C17744445 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C199539241 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C2776218876 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C2778447849 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C2779103253 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C39389867 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C39549134 @default.
• W202365784 hasConceptScore W202365784C55587333 @default.
• W202365784 hasIssue "2-3" @default.
• W202365784 hasLocation W2023657841 @default.
• W202365784 hasOpenAccess W202365784 @default.
• W202365784 hasPrimaryLocation W2023657841 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W110642044 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W148670178 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W1500578187 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W1882977156 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2016048226 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2144902876 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2272560030 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W230466808 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2406469055 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2460167154 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2555860859 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2736512735 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2807259366 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2951767019 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W3069878275 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W3197220600 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W321306468 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W758274586 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W8150261 @default.
• W202365784 hasRelatedWork W2324983066 @default.
• W202365784 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W202365784 isParatext "false" @default.
• W202365784 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W202365784 magId "202365784" @default.
• W202365784 workType "article" @default.