FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023706355> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023706355 endingPage "84" @default.
• W2023706355 startingPage "75" @default.
• W2023706355 abstract "T HE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE has presented two proposals in recent months for new, generally higher brokerage commissions. Under the proposal of February, 1970, commissions would be drastically increased for small orders and substantially decreased for large orders, with a net increase of about 18 per cent in overall commission dollars for given total volume. This proposal met substantial opposition both within and without the brokerage industry. Small investors were unhappy with the prospect of commission increases ranging up to 163 per cent and brokerage firms specializing in institutional business balked at the thought of losing up to 37 per cent of their commission on large transactions. In July, 1970, a new proposal was released limiting commission increases on small orders to 50 per cent and leaving large-order commissions generally unchanged. The net overall effect of the July proposal is a substantially higher increase, about 29 per cent, in overall commission dollars for given total volume. The latest proposal has excited relatively little controversy within the brokerage industry. It received tentative SEC approval on October 22, but with certain significant qualifications. In the meantime, the industry re, quested a temporary surcharge.' This received 90-day approval by the SEC in April, 1970. The approval was renewed for an additional 90 days in July and in August, 1970, was renewed for an indefinite period. To the layman, as well as to many in the brokerage industry, these two proposals are merely tables of numbers representing commission dollars for transactions of typical size. It takes considerable effort and study of the tables to achieve an understanding of the broad impact of the various proposals vis-a-vis the existing commission schedule. The graphical format presented in this article is designed to help the many interested parties achieve that understanding. Section I of this paper describes the graphical framework used to illustrate existing and proposed commission schedules. In Section II, curves for the existing commission schedule are presented. Section III presents, for three selected share prices, commission curves for (a) the existing schedule, (b) the existing schedule plus the $15 surcharge, JOHN SCHREINER is Assistant Professor of Finatce at the University of Minnesota. He was formerly associated with James Talcott, Inc., New York. His academic degrees are: B.S. (University of Utah), M.B.A. (Harvard University), and Ph.D. (University of California, Los Angeles). 1. Footnotes appear at end of article." @default.
• W2023706355 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023706355 creator A5018745104 @default.
• W2023706355 date "1971-07-01" @default.
• W2023706355 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2023706355 title "Graphical Comparisons of Actual and Proposed Brokerage Commission Schedules" @default.
• W2023706355 cites W609352798 @default.
• W2023706355 cites W2970869673 @default.
• W2023706355 doi "https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v27.n4.75" @default.
• W2023706355 hasPublicationYear "1971" @default.
• W2023706355 type Work @default.
• W2023706355 sameAs 2023706355 @default.
• W2023706355 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2023706355 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023706355 hasAuthorship W2023706355A5018745104 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConceptScore W2023706355C10138342 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConceptScore W2023706355C121955636 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConceptScore W2023706355C144133560 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConceptScore W2023706355C162118730 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConceptScore W2023706355C2776034101 @default.
• W2023706355 hasConceptScore W2023706355C41008148 @default.
• W2023706355 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2023706355 hasLocation W20237063551 @default.
• W2023706355 hasOpenAccess W2023706355 @default.
• W2023706355 hasPrimaryLocation W20237063551 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W1539921135 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W164362287 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W2012529923 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W2159232701 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W2348075735 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W2351747085 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W3122722293 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W3135270396 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W3185280790 @default.
• W2023706355 hasRelatedWork W60951699 @default.
• W2023706355 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W2023706355 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023706355 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023706355 magId "2023706355" @default.
• W2023706355 workType "article" @default.