FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023784859> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023784859 endingPage "230" @default.
• W2023784859 startingPage "221" @default.
• W2023784859 abstract "R&D ManagementVolume 9, Issue s1 p. 221-230 Patterns of influence in research work: the problems of autonomy and democracy Marja Alestalo, Marja Alestalo University of HelsinkiSearch for more papers by this author Marja Alestalo, Marja Alestalo University of HelsinkiSearch for more papers by this author First published: August 1979 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1979.tb01300.xCitations: 3AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Alestalo, Marja (1977) ‘ Interdisciplinarity in the light of the development of science and the actual research work’, Paper presented at the ISA Conference of the Research Committee on the Sociology of Science, Budapest, Sept. Allardt, E. (1977) ‘ Inhimilliset kärsimykset, arvot ja yhteiskuntatieteellinen tutkimus’, in: Korkeakoulu ja tiedepoliittinen tutkimussäätiö: Demokratia ja tasa-arvo. Helsinki : WSOY, p. 33. Alutto, J. A. & Belasco, J. A. (1972) ‘A Typology for participation in organizational decision making’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, 117–125. Andrews, F. M. (1975) ‘ Social and physiological factors which influence the creative process’ in: J. A. Taylor and J. W. Getzels (eds.) Perspectives in Creativity, Chicago : Aldine, pp. 117–145. F. M. Andrews (ed.) (1978) ‘ The international study: its data sources and measurement procedures’, in: The Effectiveness of Research Units: A Study in Six Countries. London : Cambridge University Preis (in press). Aram, J. D., Morgan, C. P. & Esbeck, E. S. (1971) ‘Relation of collaborative interpersonal relationships to individual satisfaction and organizational performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 16, 3, 289–296. Blackwell, G. W. (1955) ‘Multidisciplinary team research’, Social Forces, Vol. 33, 4, 367–374. Bonmariage, J., Legros, E. & Vessière, M. (1979) ‘ Ratings of research unit Performance’ in: F. M. Andrews (ed.) The Effectiveness of Research Units: A Study in Six Countries, London : Cambridge University Press (in press). Brewer, J. (1971) ‘Flow of communications, expert qualifications and organizational authority structure’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 36, 475–484. Commoner, B. (1966) Science and Survival. London : Gollancz. Cotgrove, S. & Box, S. (1974) ‘ Scientific identity, occupational selection and role strain’ in: S. P. Restivo & C. K. Vanderpool (eds.), Comparative Studies in Science and Society, Columbus , Ohio : C. Merrill, pp. 112, 174–183. Eaton, J. W. (1973) ‘ Social processes of professional teamwork’, American Sociological Review, 707–713. Ellis, N. D. (1972) ‘ The occupation of science’ in: B. Barnes (ed.) Sociology of Science. Harmondsworth : Penguin Books, pp. 188–206. Etzioni. A. (1959) ‘Authority structure and organizational effectiveness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 4, 1, 43–67. Farris. G. & Francis. G. L. (1969) ‘Effects of performance on leadership, cohesiveness, influence, satisfaction and subsequent performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 53, 490–497. Hagström, W. O. (1964) ‘Traditional and modern forms of scientific team-work’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 9, 241–260. Hagström, W. O.: (1965) The Scientific Community. New York : Basic Books, pp. 115. Harrison, F. (1974) ‘The management of scientists: determinants of perceived role performance’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17, 2, 234–241. Hollander, E. P. (1971) ‘Style, structure and setting in organizational leadership’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 16, 1–9. Jewkes, S. & Stillerman, L. (1958) The Sources of Invention. London : Macmillan, pp. 137–142. Kahn, R. L. (1974) ‘ The work module: a proposal for the humanization of work’ in: J. O'Toole (ed.) Work and the Quality of Life. Resource Paper for Work in America. Cambridge , Mass. : The MIT Press, pp. 199–226. Kaplan, N. (1959) ‘The role of the research administrator’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 1, 4, 20–96. Knorr, K., Mittermeir, R., Aichholzer, G. & Waller, G. (1979) ‘ Supervisors and group performance: a human relations thesis confirmed for academic research units’, in F. M. Andrews (ed.), The Effectiveness of Research Units: A Study of Six Countries. London : Cambridge University Press (in press). Kornhauser, W. (1962) Scientists in Industry: Conflict and Accommodation. Berkeley , Calif. : University of California Press, p. 44. Kowalewska, S. (1979) ‘ Patterns of influence in research units’ in: F. M. Andrews (ed.), The Effectiveness of Research Units: A Study in Six Countries. London : Cambridge University Press (in press). Lammers, C. J. Power and participation in decision making in formal organizations’, American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 73, 201–206, 207. Lawler, E. E. & Hackman, J. R. (1969) ‘Impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 53, 6, 467–471. Lilja, K. (1977) Työntekijöiden osallistuminen hallintoon teollisuusyrityksissá. Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulun julkaisuja B-22. Helsinki, p. 17. Löppönen, P. & Noro, A. (1975) ‘ Tieteen yhteiskunnallisista yhteyksistä’, in: K. Bruun, K. Eskola and M. Viikari (eds.), Tiedepolitiikka ja tutkijan vastuu. Helsinki : Tammi, pp. 27–63. Marcson, S. (1960) The Scientists in American Industry. New York : Harper & Bros., pp. 5, 21. Miller, G. A. (1967) ‘Professionals in bureaucracy. Alienation among industrial scientists and engineers’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 72, 755–768. Parsons, T. (1956) ‘Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 1, 237. Payne, R. L. & Mansfield, R. R. (1973) ‘Relationships of Perceptions of Organizational Climate to Organizational Structure, Context and Hierarchical Position’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, 515–526. Pelz, D. C. (1962) ‘ Some social factors related to performance in a research organization’ in: B. Barber and W. Hirsch (eds.), The Sociology of Science. Glencoe , Ill. : The Free Press. Pelz, D. C. & Andrews, F. M. (1966) ‘Autonomy, Coordination, and Stimulation in Relation to Scientific Achievement’, Behavioral Science, Vol. 11, 89–97. Polanyi, M. (1962) The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Chicago : Roosevelt University. Polanyi, M. (1964) Science, Faith and Society. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Ravetz, J. (1973) Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Harmondsworth : Penguin Books. Schuler, R. S. (1976) ‘Participation with supervisor and subordinate authoritarianism: a path-goal theory of reconciliation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, 320–326. Smith, D. C. & Snow, R. E. (1976) ‘The division of labor, conceptual and methodological issues’, Social Forces, Vol. 55, 5, 520–526. Stahl, M. J. (1977) ‘Innovation and productivity in R & D: associated individual and organizational variables’, R & D Management, Vol. 7, 2, 71–76. Stolte-Heiskanen, V. (1976) ‘Tutkimustoiminnan autonomia ja tutkimuksen tulcksellisuus’, Sosiologia, Vol. 1, 3–15. Stolte-Heiskanen, V. & Alestalo, M. (1978) Tutkimustoiminnan mikrokosmos: tutkimusryhmät ja tulcksellisuus. Helsinki , Suomen Akatemia, p. 13. Weinberg, A. M. (1967) Reflections on Big Science. London : Pergamon Press. White, J. K. & Ruh, R. A. (1973) ‘Effect of research values on the relation-ship between participation and job attitudes’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, 4, 506–507. Virtanen, K. (1977) ‘ The role and position of the technical staff in research organization’, Paper presented at the ISA Conference of the Research Committee on the Sociology of Science, Budapest, Sept. Wofford, J. C. (1971) ‘ Managerial behavior, situational factors, and productivity and morale’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 10–17. Vroom, V. H. (1967) Work and Motivation, New York : John Wiley & Sons. Citing Literature Volume9, Issues1August 1979Pages 221-230 ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W2023784859 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023784859 creator A5088196186 @default.
• W2023784859 date "1979-08-01" @default.
• W2023784859 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2023784859 title "Patterns of influence in research work: the problems of autonomy and democracy" @default.
• W2023784859 cites W190535179 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W1971795729 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W1975397989 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W1976015606 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W1986362196 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W1994681253 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2017863849 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2021866492 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2027886657 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2030451565 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2089547586 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2090161331 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2127092571 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2167592468 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2175035305 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2312519377 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2320078861 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2328126283 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2330020509 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2331367826 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W2334412071 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W4256247938 @default.
• W2023784859 cites W4299411961 @default.
• W2023784859 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1979.tb01300.x" @default.
• W2023784859 hasPublicationYear "1979" @default.
• W2023784859 type Work @default.
• W2023784859 sameAs 2023784859 @default.
• W2023784859 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2023784859 countsByYear W20237848592015 @default.
• W2023784859 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023784859 hasAuthorship W2023784859A5088196186 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C127413603 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C144024400 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C15744967 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C17744445 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C18762648 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C199539241 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C555826173 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C65414064 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C78519656 @default.
• W2023784859 hasConceptScore W2023784859C94625758 @default.
• W2023784859 hasIssue "s1" @default.
• W2023784859 hasLocation W20237848591 @default.
• W2023784859 hasOpenAccess W2023784859 @default.
• W2023784859 hasPrimaryLocation W20237848591 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W2027601931 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W2371070359 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W2384202322 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W2384616251 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W2391885711 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W2392743659 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W3084038518 @default.
• W2023784859 hasRelatedWork W4281754074 @default.
• W2023784859 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W2023784859 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023784859 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023784859 magId "2023784859" @default.
• W2023784859 workType "article" @default.