FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023846977> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023846977 endingPage "417" @default.
• W2023846977 startingPage "415" @default.
• W2023846977 abstract "Because of the declining incidence of anaerobic bacteremia, the predictable sites of anaerobic infection and the increasing importance of aerobic isolates (eg; yeasts), the practice of routinely culturing half the volume of blood collected anaerobically has been questioned. We have assessed the yield of routine anaerobic blood cultures in our clinical setting. Blood culture isolates from November 1994 through October 1995 at Auckland (AKH) and Green Lane/National Women’s Hospitals (GL/NWH) were recorded. The medical records of patients with anaerobic bacteremia were examined. For the three month period April to June 1996, all positive blood cultures were analysed with respect to which bottle (aerobic or anaerobic or both) was positive. For the period November 1994 to October 1995, 5.6% and 5.3% of blood cultures at AKH and GLH respectively were positive. At AKH and GLH anaerobes constituted 0.16% and 0.19% of all blood cultures and 3.1% and 3.5% of all positive blood cultures respectively. Twentyone of 25 (84%) significant anaerobes were from patients in whom anaerobic infection was predictable. More isolates were recovered from aerobic than anaerobic bottles, 178 versus 71, p < 0.001. Aerobic culture also recovered more pathogens (76 versus 38, p < 0.001 more yeasts (10 versus 0) and more Pseudomonas SPP. (10 versus 1) than did anaerobic culture. Only obligat e anaerobes were isolated more frequently in anaerobic bottles (5 versus 0, p = 0.03). Most instances of anaerobic bacteremia occurred in patients where anaerobes could be expected. We conclude that routine use of two aerobic bottles with clinically directed use of anaerobic blood culture bottle is an appropriate and effective approach in our setting. Because of the declining incidence of anaerobic bacteremia, the predictable sites of anaerobic infection and the increasing importance of aerobic isolates (eg; yeasts), the practice of routinely culturing half the volume of blood collected anaerobically has been questioned. We have assessed the yield of routine anaerobic blood cultures in our clinical setting. Blood culture isolates from November 1994 through October 1995 at Auckland (AKH) and Green Lane/National Women’s Hospitals (GL/NWH) were recorded. The medical records of patients with anaerobic bacteremia were examined. For the three month period April to June 1996, all positive blood cultures were analysed with respect to which bottle (aerobic or anaerobic or both) was positive. For the period November 1994 to October 1995, 5.6% and 5.3% of blood cultures at AKH and GLH respectively were positive. At AKH and GLH anaerobes constituted 0.16% and 0.19% of all blood cultures and 3.1% and 3.5% of all positive blood cultures respectively. Twentyone of 25 (84%) significant anaerobes were from patients in whom anaerobic infection was predictable. More isolates were recovered from aerobic than anaerobic bottles, 178 versus 71, p < 0.001. Aerobic culture also recovered more pathogens (76 versus 38, p < 0.001 more yeasts (10 versus 0) and more Pseudomonas SPP. (10 versus 1) than did anaerobic culture. Only obligat e anaerobes were isolated more frequently in anaerobic bottles (5 versus 0, p = 0.03). Most instances of anaerobic bacteremia occurred in patients where anaerobes could be expected. We conclude that routine use of two aerobic bottles with clinically directed use of anaerobic blood culture bottle is an appropriate and effective approach in our setting." @default.
• W2023846977 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023846977 creator A5009295731 @default.
• W2023846977 creator A5062571935 @default.
• W2023846977 date "1997-01-01" @default.
• W2023846977 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2023846977 title "Assessment of the yield of anaerobic blood cultures" @default.
• W2023846977 cites W1579739800 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W1881612793 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W1923288213 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W1968089699 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W2031702920 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W2040339963 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W2082996726 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W2103254905 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W2114167195 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W2168526222 @default.
• W2023846977 cites W2317500780 @default.
• W2023846977 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/00313029700169425" @default.
• W2023846977 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9423226" @default.
• W2023846977 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W2023846977 type Work @default.
• W2023846977 sameAs 2023846977 @default.
• W2023846977 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2023846977 countsByYear W20238469772017 @default.
• W2023846977 countsByYear W20238469772019 @default.
• W2023846977 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023846977 hasAuthorship W2023846977A5009295731 @default.
• W2023846977 hasAuthorship W2023846977A5062571935 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C2779443120 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C2779473907 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C2992397963 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C42407357 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C42972112 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C5140985 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C126322002 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C2779443120 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C2779473907 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C2992397963 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C42407357 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C42972112 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C501593827 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C5140985 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C523546767 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C54355233 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C71924100 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C86803240 @default.
• W2023846977 hasConceptScore W2023846977C89423630 @default.
• W2023846977 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2023846977 hasLocation W20238469771 @default.
• W2023846977 hasLocation W20238469772 @default.
• W2023846977 hasOpenAccess W2023846977 @default.
• W2023846977 hasPrimaryLocation W20238469771 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W1881612793 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2004908794 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2004919082 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2008862247 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2012000360 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2036820404 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2118333322 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2119671442 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2410736979 @default.
• W2023846977 hasRelatedWork W2750985045 @default.
• W2023846977 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2023846977 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2023846977 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2023846977 magId "2023846977" @default.
• W2023846977 workType "article" @default.