FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023921955> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023921955 abstract "The success of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative was remarkable, but four countries - Afghanistan, Pakistan, India and Nigeria - never interrupted polio transmission. Pakistan reportedly achieved all milestones except interrupting virus transmission. The aim of the study was to establish valid and reliable estimate for: routine oral polio vaccine (OPV) coverage, logistics management and the quality of monitoring systems in health facilities, NIDs OPV coverage, the quality of NIDs service delivery in static centers and mobile teams, and to ultimately provide scientific evidence for tailoring future interventions.A cross-sectional study using lot quality assessment sampling was conducted in the District Nankana Sahib of Pakistan's Punjab province. Twenty primary health centers and their catchment areas were selected randomly as 'lots'. The study involved the evaluation of 1080 children aged 12-23 months for routine OPV coverage, 20 health centers for logistics management and quality of monitoring systems, 420 households for NIDs OPV coverage, 20 static centers and 20 mobile teams for quality of NIDs service delivery. Study instruments were designed according to WHO guidelines.Five out of twenty lots were rejected for unacceptably low routine immunization coverage. The validity of coverage was questionable to extent that all lots were rejected. Among the 54.1% who were able to present immunization cards, only 74.0% had valid immunization. Routine coverage was significantly associated with card availability and socioeconomic factors. The main reasons for routine immunization failure were absence of a vaccinator and unawareness of need for immunization. Health workers (96.9%) were a major source of information. All of the 20 lots were rejected for poor compliance in logistics management and quality of monitoring systems. Mean compliance score and compliance percentage for logistics management were 5.4 +/- 2.0 (scale 0-9) and 59.4% while those for quality of monitoring systems were 3.3 +/- 1.2 (scale 0-6) and 54.2%. The 15 out of 20 lots were rejected for unacceptably low NIDs coverage by finger-mark. All of the 20 lots were rejected for poor NIDs service delivery (mean compliance score = 11.7 +/- 2.1 [scale 0-16]; compliance percentage = 72.8%).Low coverage, both routine and during NIDs, and poor quality of logistics management, monitoring systems and NIDs service delivery were highlighted as major constraints in polio eradication and these should be considered in prioritizing future strategies." @default.
• W2023921955 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5002768454 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5007976531 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5021188328 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5025546061 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5029527466 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5041882264 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5045258146 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5046143441 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5047547929 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5062093482 @default.
• W2023921955 creator A5086756289 @default.
• W2023921955 date "2010-02-09" @default.
• W2023921955 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2023921955 title "Are we doing enough? Evaluation of the Polio Eradication Initiative in a district of Pakistan's Punjab province: a LQAS study" @default.
• W2023921955 cites W1518823813 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W1846898798 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W1995791832 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W1999800792 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2018079892 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2023172699 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2063068173 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2074189786 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2098512164 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2106329952 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2107368712 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2113055926 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2132424909 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2141191267 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2142357437 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2143492826 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2155383948 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2158692127 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2160048974 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2409375639 @default.
• W2023921955 cites W2734748149 @default.
• W2023921955 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-60" @default.
• W2023921955 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2845105" @default.
• W2023921955 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20144212" @default.
• W2023921955 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2023921955 type Work @default.
• W2023921955 sameAs 2023921955 @default.
• W2023921955 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552012 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552013 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552014 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552015 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552016 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552017 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552018 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552019 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552020 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552021 @default.
• W2023921955 countsByYear W20239219552023 @default.
• W2023921955 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5002768454 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5007976531 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5021188328 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5025546061 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5029527466 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5041882264 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5045258146 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5046143441 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5047547929 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5062093482 @default.
• W2023921955 hasAuthorship W2023921955A5086756289 @default.
• W2023921955 hasBestOaLocation W20239219551 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C140556311 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C151492266 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C159047783 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C183380357 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C195454712 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C22070199 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C2522874641 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C2776438120 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C2779631682 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C2910093947 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C4870876 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C138816342 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C140556311 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C151492266 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C159047783 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C159110408 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C183380357 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C187212893 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C195454712 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C203014093 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C22070199 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C2522874641 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C27415008 @default.
• W2023921955 hasConceptScore W2023921955C2776438120 @default.

• next