FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2023985296> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2023985296 endingPage "e259" @default.
• W2023985296 startingPage "e259" @default.
• W2023985296 abstract "Background. An important outcome from the debate on whether wellness equals happiness, is the need of research focusing on how psychological well-being might influence humans’ ability to adapt to the changing environment and live in harmony. To get a detailed picture of the influence of positive and negative affect, the current study employed the affective profiles model in which individuals are categorised into groups based on either high positive and low negative affect (self-fulfilling); high positive and high negative affect (high affective); low positive and low negative affect (low affective); and high negative and low positive affect (self-destructive). The aims were to (1) investigate differences between affective profiles in psychological well-being and harmony and (2) how psychological well-being and its dimensions relate to harmony within the four affective profiles.Method. 500 participants (mean age = 34.14 years, SD. = ±12.75 years; 187 males and 313 females) were recruited online and required to answer three self-report measures: The Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; The Scales of Psychological Well-Being (short version) and The Harmony in Life Scale. We conducted a Multivariate Analysis of Variance where the affective profiles and gender were the independent factors and psychological well-being composite score, its six dimensions as well as the harmony in life score were the dependent factors. In addition, we conducted four multi-group (i.e., the four affective profiles) moderation analyses with the psychological well-being dimensions as predictors and harmony in life as the dependent variables.Results. Individuals categorised as self-fulfilling, as compared to the other profiles, tended to score higher on the psychological well-being dimensions: positive relations, environmental mastery, self-acceptance, autonomy, personal growth, and purpose in life. In addition, 47% to 66% of the variance of the harmony in life was explained by the dimensions of psychological well-being within the four affective profiles. Specifically, harmony in life was significantly predicted by environmental mastery and self-acceptance across all affective profiles. However, for the low affective group high purpose in life predicted low levels of harmony in life.Conclusions. The results demonstrated that affective profiles systematically relate to psychological well-being and harmony in life. Notably, individuals categorised as self-fulfilling tended to report higher levels of both psychological well-being and harmony in life when compared with the other profiles. Meanwhile individuals in the self-destructive group reported the lowest levels of psychological well-being and harmony when compared with the three other profiles. It is proposed that self-acceptance and environmental acceptance might enable individuals to go from self-destructive to a self-fulfilling state that also involves harmony in life." @default.
• W2023985296 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2023985296 creator A5039906079 @default.
• W2023985296 creator A5064186818 @default.
• W2023985296 creator A5073392421 @default.
• W2023985296 date "2014-02-13" @default.
• W2023985296 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2023985296 title "The affective profiles, psychological well-being, and harmony: environmental mastery and self-acceptance predict the sense of a harmonious life" @default.
• W2023985296 cites W1966603703 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W1968646045 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W1968909311 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W1978168026 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W1989209371 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W1990100688 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W1992713484 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W1994322819 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2001626866 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2004902810 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2008072894 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2010313018 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2012087651 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2013664173 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2020412644 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2032679189 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2035424863 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2043263917 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2043599873 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2051362234 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2059356603 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2061814454 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2062243996 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2062447195 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2063496365 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2066717968 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2069351533 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2074664236 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2078860074 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2079276580 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2080709602 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2084499621 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2086237760 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2087287665 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2087426400 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2104555069 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2106568252 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2107612450 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2118796064 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2136209578 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2140882745 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2141355961 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2141708418 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2149735953 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2161103244 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2166733444 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2170696774 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2171313551 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2171967169 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W2736876702 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W3124878131 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W4234193547 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W4234715662 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W4237254037 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W4237530378 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W4252468642 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W4292994367 @default.
• W2023985296 cites W77584474 @default.
• W2023985296 doi "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.259" @default.
• W2023985296 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3933359" @default.
• W2023985296 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24688843" @default.
• W2023985296 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2023985296 type Work @default.
• W2023985296 sameAs 2023985296 @default.
• W2023985296 citedByCount "67" @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962014 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962015 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962016 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962017 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962018 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962019 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962020 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962021 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962022 @default.
• W2023985296 countsByYear W20239852962023 @default.
• W2023985296 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2023985296 hasAuthorship W2023985296A5039906079 @default.
• W2023985296 hasAuthorship W2023985296A5064186818 @default.
• W2023985296 hasAuthorship W2023985296A5073392421 @default.
• W2023985296 hasBestOaLocation W20239852961 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C112570445 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C197253505 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C2776420229 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C2776453491 @default.
• W2023985296 hasConcept C2778999518 @default.

• next