Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024018319> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2024018319 endingPage "40" @default.
- W2024018319 startingPage "13" @default.
- W2024018319 abstract "Abstract Stepwise decision making has long been utilised as a tool for handling the technical complexity of radioactive waste management (RWM). Recently, it is being recognised as a useful means to address social complexities. This paper reviews—through a number of examples—the current developments regarding the stepwise approach to managing long‐lived wastes from a societal point of view with the aim of pinpointing where it stands, highlighting its social dimensions, and identifying guiding principles and issues in implementation. It is observed that there is convergence between the approach taken by the practitioners of RWM and the indications received from social research, and that general guiding principles can be distilled from the analysis of RWM case histories. The paper concludes that a stepwise approach to decision‐making indeed constitutes an effective tool, and that competing requirements of social sustainability and efficiency, openness and analytical rigour will need to be balanced. A long‐term process of decision‐making incorporating the views of national and local stakeholders will very likely be a difficult process to implement. The concrete arrangements for sketching out and agreeing on decision phases, for selecting and involving stakeholders in a participatory process, and for adapting institutions to meet long‐term requirements, will require careful reflection and tuning in each national context. 1. This paper is based on a recent report developed within the framework of the OECD NEA Forum for Stakeholder Confidence (FSC), entitled Stepwise Approach to Decision Making for Long‐term Radioactive Waste Management. Experience, Issues and Guiding Principles (OECD NEA, Paris, 2004). The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Claire Mays and Yves Le Bars for their help in preparing the above report. Thanks are also due to members of the NEA Radioactive Waste Management Committee and the Forum on Stakeholder Confidence for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of the above report. Keywords: Radioactive wastestepwise approachadoptive management Notes 1. This paper is based on a recent report developed within the framework of the OECD NEA Forum for Stakeholder Confidence (FSC), entitled Stepwise Approach to Decision Making for Long‐term Radioactive Waste Management. Experience, Issues and Guiding Principles (OECD NEA, Paris, 2004). The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Claire Mays and Yves Le Bars for their help in preparing the above report. Thanks are also due to members of the NEA Radioactive Waste Management Committee and the Forum on Stakeholder Confidence for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of the above report. 2. This strive to protect society for ‘all time’ is likely to gain the management of other industrial and toxic waste that have, in practice, indefinite life times (Wingefors, Citation2003). 3. According to Rip (Citation1987) a system is socially robust ‘if most arguments, evidence, social alignments, interests, and cultural values lead to a consistent option’ (p. 359). 4. Broad factors that might lead or contribute to a decision to retrieve waste, and weigh in favour of building provisions for retrievability, are described in (NEA, Citation2001), which also reports arguments against retrievability. 5. According to Stirling (Citation2003a) uncertainty denotes ‘a situation where it is possible to define a finite set of discrete outcomes, .. but where it is acknowledged that there simply exists no credible basis for the assignment of probability distributions’ (p. 44), ‘ambiguity describes a situation where a variety of divergent, but equally reasonable framing assumptions precludes imposition of any single definitive scheme of outcomes’ (p.45); while ignorance is ‘a state of knowledge under which we are able neither fully to quantify likelihoods nor definitively to characterize or make commensurate all the possible outcome parameters’ (p. 46) 6. The study included five states within the United States: California, Illinois, Nebraska, New York and Texas, and five additional countries: Canada, France, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland. 7. Such workshops were organised in Finland, Canada, Belgium and Germany, respectively (NEA, Citation2000, Citation2002, Citation2003a, Citation2004a, Citationforthcoming‐a) (also available at http://www.nea.fr/html/rwm/fsc.html). 8. Most elements are proposed to be implemented as stepwise processes themselves. 9. The SFL 3‐5 facility would deal with other long‐lived radioactive wastes than spent fuel. 10. The ex‐ante approach is implemented, for example, in France for the high‐activity waste disposal programme, but the funding goes to the affected regional governments and not only to a single municipality. 11. Ideally, there are multiple communities that are willing to accept the facility, and a competitive site‐selection process is employed. 12. This is reflected by the fact that in the last decade the vast majority of new reactors have been established in transition or developing countries." @default.
- W2024018319 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2024018319 creator A5023695278 @default.
- W2024018319 creator A5028035335 @default.
- W2024018319 date "2006-01-01" @default.
- W2024018319 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2024018319 title "Stepwise Approach to the Long‐Term Management of Radioactive Waste1" @default.
- W2024018319 cites W1548156315 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W1591030563 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W1976252533 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W1989715100 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2003759077 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2020490763 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2027579645 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2051362523 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2052331517 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2072395446 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2073420875 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2075825194 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2093396338 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2131050883 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2144100620 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2493597726 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W2498046886 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W4238503401 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W72333783 @default.
- W2024018319 cites W98475387 @default.
- W2024018319 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870500180048" @default.
- W2024018319 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W2024018319 type Work @default.
- W2024018319 sameAs 2024018319 @default.
- W2024018319 citedByCount "22" @default.
- W2024018319 countsByYear W20240183192012 @default.
- W2024018319 countsByYear W20240183192014 @default.
- W2024018319 countsByYear W20240183192015 @default.
- W2024018319 countsByYear W20240183192017 @default.
- W2024018319 countsByYear W20240183192021 @default.
- W2024018319 countsByYear W20240183192022 @default.
- W2024018319 countsByYear W20240183192023 @default.
- W2024018319 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2024018319 hasAuthorship W2024018319A5023695278 @default.
- W2024018319 hasAuthorship W2024018319A5028035335 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C61797465 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C66204764 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C71008984 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C84976871 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C111919701 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C112930515 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C121332964 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C127413603 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C144133560 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C151730666 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C15744967 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C17744445 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C18903297 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C195094911 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C201305675 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C2524010 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C2779343474 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C33923547 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C39549134 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C41008148 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C539667460 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C61797465 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C62520636 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C66204764 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C71008984 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C77805123 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C84976871 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C86803240 @default.
- W2024018319 hasConceptScore W2024018319C98045186 @default.
- W2024018319 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2024018319 hasLocation W20240183191 @default.
- W2024018319 hasOpenAccess W2024018319 @default.
- W2024018319 hasPrimaryLocation W20240183191 @default.
- W2024018319 hasRelatedWork W2060617726 @default.
- W2024018319 hasRelatedWork W2353783177 @default.