Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024078001> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2024078001 endingPage "1453" @default.
- W2024078001 startingPage "1445" @default.
- W2024078001 abstract "In Brief Study Design. A validated L3–L4 nonlinear finite element model was used to evaluate strain and pressure in the surrounding structures for 4 nucleus replacement technologies. Objective. The objective of the current study was to compare subsidence and anular damage potential between 4 current nucleus replacement technologies. It was hypothesized that a fully conforming nucleus replacement would minimize the risk of both subsidence and anular damage. Summary of Background Data. Nucleus pulposus replacements are emerging as a less invasive alternative to total disc replacement and fusion as a solution to degenerative intervertebral discs. Multiple technologies have been developed and are currently undergoing clinical investigation. Methods. The testing conditions were applied by excavating the nucleus of the intact model and virtually implanting models representing the various nucleus replacement technologies. The implants consisted of a conforming injectable polyurethane (E = 4 MPa), soft hydrogel (E = 4 MPa), stiff hydrogel (E = 20 MPa), and polyether-etherketone (PEEK) on PEEK articulating designs. The model was exercised in flexion, extension, lateral bending, axial rotation (7.5 Nm with 450 N preload), and compression (1000 N). Vertebral body strain, anular maximum shear strain, endplate contact pressure, anulus-implant contact pressure, and bone remodeling stimulus were reported. Results. The PEEK implant induced strain maxima in the vertebral bodies with associated endplate contact pressure concentrations. For the PEEK and hydrogel implants, areas of nonconformity with the endplate indicatedadjacent bone resorption. Lack of conformity between the implant and inner anulus for the PEEK and hydrogel implants resulted in inward anular bulging with associated increased maximum shear strain. The conforming polyurethane implant maintained outward bulging of the inner anular wall and indicated no bone resorption or stress shielding adjacent to the implant. Conclusion. A fully conforming nucleus replacement resulted in a decreased propensity for subsidence, anular bulging, and further degeneration of the anulus when compared with nonconforming implants. A finite element model evaluated strain and pressure in the surrounding structures of 4 nucleus replacement technologies. Lack of implant nuclear cavity conformity caused inward anular bulging, increased shear strain, high endplate pressure concentrations, and nonbiofidelic bone resorption. Implant conformance resulted in decreased propensity for subsidence and further anular degeneration." @default.
- W2024078001 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2024078001 creator A5016319254 @default.
- W2024078001 creator A5052669202 @default.
- W2024078001 creator A5053638480 @default.
- W2024078001 creator A5080862819 @default.
- W2024078001 date "2010-07-01" @default.
- W2024078001 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
- W2024078001 title "The Restoration of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Load Distribution" @default.
- W2024078001 cites W143623202 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1485385770 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1516288379 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1963256207 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1964652258 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1976520665 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1981927924 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1990112768 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1995024359 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W1999256130 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2000898115 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2005517134 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2009630598 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2010117675 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2011249894 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2011280058 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2014415646 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2015670433 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2016032138 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2017602517 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2023499293 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2028368206 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2034253140 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2034737207 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2038214175 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2040373308 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2047287132 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2048434635 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2060068739 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2061951299 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2063552028 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2065447627 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2070604339 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2073391296 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2075116788 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2075996789 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2076813101 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2077205535 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2079387407 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2081253792 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2081538797 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2081989536 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2082631996 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2084594392 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2085480955 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2087004414 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2087036354 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2088873760 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2092037330 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2094593242 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2099359603 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2109585241 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2110167861 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2118436663 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2121787709 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2125097301 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2135587550 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2143226335 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2144358088 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W2153636996 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W269756791 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W3023835653 @default.
- W2024078001 cites W4205191735 @default.
- W2024078001 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e3181bef192" @default.
- W2024078001 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20216342" @default.
- W2024078001 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2024078001 type Work @default.
- W2024078001 sameAs 2024078001 @default.
- W2024078001 citedByCount "16" @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012012 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012013 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012014 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012015 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012016 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012017 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012020 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012021 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012022 @default.
- W2024078001 countsByYear W20240780012023 @default.
- W2024078001 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2024078001 hasAuthorship W2024078001A5016319254 @default.
- W2024078001 hasAuthorship W2024078001A5052669202 @default.
- W2024078001 hasAuthorship W2024078001A5053638480 @default.
- W2024078001 hasAuthorship W2024078001A5080862819 @default.
- W2024078001 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2024078001 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
- W2024078001 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2024078001 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
- W2024078001 hasConcept C192562407 @default.