Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024135944> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- W2024135944 endingPage "597" @default.
- W2024135944 startingPage "580" @default.
- W2024135944 abstract "This article examines the curious phenomenon that Tertullian, despite explicitly contending that Marcion mutilated the Gospel of Luke, appears to accuse Marcion of having excised passages from it which are found in, and usually only in, Matthew. Scholarly explanations for this phenomenon include his having committed some type of error, his employing the term ‘Gospel’ for the fourfold Gospel, and his text of Luke containing readings from Matthew or Mark that are not in Luke as we know it. A version of the view that Tertullian's text of Luke contained harmonizations to Matthew or Mark was advocated by David S. Williams in a 1991 article, and subsequently embraced by Andrew Gregory. Though the possibility of harmonizations in Tertullian's text must be taken seriously, Williams's ‘exploratory and programmatic’ arguments for Tertullian's potentially extensive use of a harmonized source are, for both methodological and conceptual reasons, less than persuasive. After discussing the weaknesses in Williams's view, this article argues that in all but one case, where Tertullian's memory failed him, the best explanation for his accusations is that he viewed the four gospels as comprising ‘the Gospel’, and therefore that his accusations in Adversus Marcionem were motivated by Marcion having rejected the Gospel of Matthew." @default.
- W2024135944 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2024135944 creator A5068473517 @default.
- W2024135944 date "2008-07-26" @default.
- W2024135944 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2024135944 title "Matthean Texts and Tertullian's Accusations in Adversus Marcionem" @default.
- W2024135944 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/fln100" @default.
- W2024135944 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2024135944 type Work @default.
- W2024135944 sameAs 2024135944 @default.
- W2024135944 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2024135944 countsByYear W20241359442015 @default.
- W2024135944 countsByYear W20241359442020 @default.
- W2024135944 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2024135944 hasAuthorship W2024135944A5068473517 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConcept C2781384534 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConcept C50335755 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConceptScore W2024135944C111472728 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConceptScore W2024135944C124952713 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConceptScore W2024135944C138885662 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConceptScore W2024135944C142362112 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConceptScore W2024135944C27206212 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConceptScore W2024135944C2781384534 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConceptScore W2024135944C50335755 @default.
- W2024135944 hasConceptScore W2024135944C95457728 @default.
- W2024135944 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2024135944 hasLocation W20241359441 @default.
- W2024135944 hasOpenAccess W2024135944 @default.
- W2024135944 hasPrimaryLocation W20241359441 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W1989354261 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2063764753 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2125565096 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2161654267 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2318297636 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2320594403 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2331269012 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2024135944 hasRelatedWork W2908623481 @default.
- W2024135944 hasVolume "59" @default.
- W2024135944 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2024135944 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2024135944 magId "2024135944" @default.
- W2024135944 workType "article" @default.