FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024320873> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2024320873 abstract "The paper analyzes a transparency of business activities in relation to social reporting issues. Investors, customers, employees and other stakeholders are less trustful in recent decades. While rethinking what is needed to build trust in business environment, one of the most important subjects to discuss is increasing of business transparency because companies that are in conflict with their stakeholders cannot survive for a long run. Thus, corporate social reporting serves as a true opportunity to improve trust and competitiveness.Companies report on social issues under many different communication forms such as corporate social responsibility report, sustainability report, report to society, social report, communication on progress, social information disclosure on their websites or even annual reports. European countries, including Lithuania, haven’t formed a single system of corporate social reporting as social disclosure is voluntary. Thus, not only a relatively small number of companies make these statements, but at the same time they are different in content and structure, and therefore not always comparable. Stakeholders, assessing companies in the context of social responsibility and making socio-economic decisions, have no opportunity to use understandable and comparable information on human resources, products, environment control and public services. Thus the research question is directed to the identification of problems of corporate social reporting development both at the institutional and organizational levels.The objective of this paper is to analyze problems of social reporting and disclosure in Lithuania in order to increase the transparency of business activities. The research methods applied in this article are analysis of legal acts, logical and comparative analysis OFM scientific literature, dynamic and social reporting content analysis, problem analysis. As the article refers to corporate social reporting development in Lithuania, there is the theoretical background of researches mainly made in Lithuania carried out. This paper also presents the problems of social reporting in Lithuania from institutional and organizational views, the results from empirical researches of companies‘ disclosed social information. The findings of the article show that still more declaratory socially responsible business ideas dominate in Lithuania, while the actual manifestation of social reporting is in the initial level. At the same time the most important thing should be the process of implementation of socially responsible business, as social reporting is rather a process for better business transparency than just a document. The process of corporate social reporting may be improved by strengthening legal framework and improving legal conditions for voluntary reporting. But at the same time the regulatory mechanism is not enough because trust is always related to main values driving the companies and their managers.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.25.1.2356" @default.
• W2024320873 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2024320873 creator A5014978009 @default.
• W2024320873 creator A5017895427 @default.
• W2024320873 creator A5070558316 @default.
• W2024320873 date "2014-03-12" @default.
• W2024320873 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2024320873 title "Increasing Business Transparency by Corporate Social Reporting: Development and Problems in Lithuania" @default.
• W2024320873 cites W1480621841 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W1528655707 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W1590293561 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W1599490776 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W1847143702 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W1992905204 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2013331577 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2020521797 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2023787025 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2076629825 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2096389044 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2102670929 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2115468243 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2119866455 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2130617737 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2137934460 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2148841467 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2159387419 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W2341526354 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W3125834252 @default.
• W2024320873 cites W592046178 @default.
• W2024320873 doi "https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.25.1.2356" @default.
• W2024320873 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2024320873 type Work @default.
• W2024320873 sameAs 2024320873 @default.
• W2024320873 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2024320873 countsByYear W20243208732015 @default.
• W2024320873 countsByYear W20243208732016 @default.
• W2024320873 countsByYear W20243208732017 @default.
• W2024320873 countsByYear W20243208732018 @default.
• W2024320873 countsByYear W20243208732019 @default.
• W2024320873 countsByYear W20243208732020 @default.
• W2024320873 countsByYear W20243208732023 @default.
• W2024320873 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2024320873 hasAuthorship W2024320873A5014978009 @default.
• W2024320873 hasAuthorship W2024320873A5017895427 @default.
• W2024320873 hasAuthorship W2024320873A5070558316 @default.
• W2024320873 hasBestOaLocation W20243208731 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C141261163 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C147598955 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C121955636 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C141261163 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C144133560 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C147598955 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C162853370 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C17744445 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C199539241 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C2780233690 @default.
• W2024320873 hasConceptScore W2024320873C39549134 @default.
• W2024320873 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2024320873 hasLocation W20243208731 @default.
• W2024320873 hasOpenAccess W2024320873 @default.
• W2024320873 hasPrimaryLocation W20243208731 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W1594991215 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W2030399644 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W2175110632 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W2344317042 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W2742150371 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W3122218373 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W4238331291 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W4244911778 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W4283793902 @default.
• W2024320873 hasRelatedWork W4311069485 @default.
• W2024320873 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W2024320873 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2024320873 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2024320873 magId "2024320873" @default.
• W2024320873 workType "article" @default.