FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024338056> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2024338056 endingPage "977" @default.
• W2024338056 startingPage "971" @default.
• W2024338056 abstract "PURPOSE: Traumatic manipulation of cancer specimens during laparoscopic colectomy may increase exfoliation of malignant cells into the peritoneal cavity, causing an early occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-sites recurrence. Because of this concern, the routine use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer was suggested recently. We assessed if laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increases exfoliated malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized fashion, 38 colorectal cancer patients undergoing an elective, curative operation were assigned to either a conventional or laparoscopic procedure between June 1996 and May 1997. In either group (n=19), after the abdominal cavity was entered, saline was instilled into the peritoneal cavity, and the fluid was collected (Specimen 1). During surgery, all irrigating fluids were collected (Specimen 2). Both specimens were assessed for malignancy using four techniques: filtration process (ThinPrep®), smear, cell block, and immunochemistry using Ber-EP4. The change in the amount of tumor cells in both specimens was compared between surgical groups. A pilot study was performed to validate the proposed cytologic method. RESULTS: In the pilot study of 20 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer, postresectional peritoneal cytology was positive in six patients, including two Stage II (T3,N0,M0) patients. The pilot study also validated that our semiquantitative scoring system can be reliably used to assess the amount of free peritoneal cancer cells. In the main study, 16 right colectomies, 3 extended right colectomies, 17 proctosigmoidectomies, and 1 left colectomy were performed. The T and N stages were T1 (n=13), T2 (n=5), T3 (n=8), T4 (n=11); N0 (n=22), N1 (n=8), N2 (n=7). Malignant cells were not detected in any Specimens 1 or, more importantly, in Specimens 2 in either surgical group. CONCLUSION: When performed according to strict oncologic surgical principles, laparoscopic techniques in curative colorectal cancer surgery did not have an increased risk of intraperitoneal cancer cell spillage, compared with conventional techniques. We hope that these results can decrease some of the concerns about tumors cell spillage and seeding during laparoscopy." @default.
• W2024338056 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2024338056 creator A5018112922 @default.
• W2024338056 creator A5020846596 @default.
• W2024338056 creator A5026198545 @default.
• W2024338056 creator A5045198929 @default.
• W2024338056 creator A5052136698 @default.
• W2024338056 creator A5066700226 @default.
• W2024338056 creator A5068339279 @default.
• W2024338056 date "1998-08-01" @default.
• W2024338056 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2024338056 title "Does laparoscopic vs. Conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer?" @default.
• W2024338056 cites W1965276101 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W1968468781 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W1975322178 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W1983696422 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W1989657003 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2004649364 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2019135015 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2035200321 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2039664265 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2054314804 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2057020453 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2078935297 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2081095585 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2326471637 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2790061763 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2884755841 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W2982989353 @default.
• W2024338056 cites W4320300927 @default.
• W2024338056 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02237382" @default.
• W2024338056 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9715151" @default.
• W2024338056 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2024338056 type Work @default.
• W2024338056 sameAs 2024338056 @default.
• W2024338056 citedByCount "83" @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562012 @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562013 @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562014 @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562015 @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562016 @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562017 @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562018 @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562021 @default.
• W2024338056 countsByYear W20243380562022 @default.
• W2024338056 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2024338056 hasAuthorship W2024338056A5018112922 @default.
• W2024338056 hasAuthorship W2024338056A5020846596 @default.
• W2024338056 hasAuthorship W2024338056A5026198545 @default.
• W2024338056 hasAuthorship W2024338056A5045198929 @default.
• W2024338056 hasAuthorship W2024338056A5052136698 @default.
• W2024338056 hasAuthorship W2024338056A5066700226 @default.
• W2024338056 hasAuthorship W2024338056A5068339279 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C2776667177 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C2778536324 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C2779399171 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C2780936613 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConcept C98055416 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C121608353 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C126322002 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C141071460 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C188816634 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C2776111594 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C2776667177 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C2778536324 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C2779399171 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C2780047204 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C2780936613 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C526805850 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C71924100 @default.
• W2024338056 hasConceptScore W2024338056C98055416 @default.
• W2024338056 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2024338056 hasLocation W20243380561 @default.
• W2024338056 hasLocation W20243380562 @default.
• W2024338056 hasOpenAccess W2024338056 @default.
• W2024338056 hasPrimaryLocation W20243380561 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W1435090577 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W1493747877 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W2069245423 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W2077466501 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W2078623687 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W2366063975 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W2775017441 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W4205158081 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W4300079461 @default.
• W2024338056 hasRelatedWork W2566355374 @default.
• W2024338056 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W2024338056 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2024338056 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2024338056 magId "2024338056" @default.

• next