FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024530015> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2024530015 endingPage "359" @default.
• W2024530015 startingPage "359" @default.
• W2024530015 abstract "Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank Andrea V Margulis,1 Manel Pladevall,1 Nuria Riera-Guardia,1 Cristina Varas-Lorenzo,1 Lorna Hazell,2,3 Nancy D Berkman,4 Meera Viswanathan,4 Susana Perez-Gutthann,1 1RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain; 2Drug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK; 3Associate Department of the School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK; 4RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA Background: The study objective was to compare the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the RTI item bank (RTI-IB) and estimate interrater agreement using the RTI-IB within a systematic review on the cardiovascular safety of glucose-lowering drugs. Methods: We tailored both tools and added four questions to the RTI-IB. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the 44 included studies with both tools, (independently for the RTI-IB) and agreed on which responses conveyed low, unclear, or high risk of bias. For each question in the RTI-IB (n=31), the observed interrater agreement was calculated as the percentage of studies given the same bias assessment by both reviewers; chance-adjusted interrater agreement was estimated with the first-order agreement coefficient (AC1) statistic. Results: The NOS required less tailoring and was easier to use than the RTI-IB, but the RTI-IB produced a more thorough assessment. The RTI-IB includes most of the domains measured in the NOS. Median observed interrater agreement for the RTI-IB was 75% (25th percentile [p25] =61%; p75 =89%); median AC1 statistic was 0.64 (p25 =0.51; p75 =0.86). Conclusion: The RTI-IB facilitates a more complete quality assessment than the NOS but is more burdensome. The observed agreement and AC1 statistic in this study were higher than those reported by the RTI-IB&#39;s developers. Keywords: systematic review, meta-analysis, quality assessment, AC1" @default.
• W2024530015 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2024530015 creator A5001004774 @default.
• W2024530015 creator A5002700523 @default.
• W2024530015 creator A5023729007 @default.
• W2024530015 creator A5025500200 @default.
• W2024530015 creator A5065722003 @default.
• W2024530015 creator A5069590194 @default.
• W2024530015 creator A5078175691 @default.
• W2024530015 creator A5082433686 @default.
• W2024530015 date "2014-10-01" @default.
• W2024530015 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2024530015 title "Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle&ndash;Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank" @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1444168786 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1524740654 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1619221657 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1714980748 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1981501248 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1981680557 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1993349052 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1996290308 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1996445490 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W1996622101 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2003182613 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2003674183 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2039440452 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2056785271 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2063098454 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2102477199 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2103899236 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2110604888 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2113801080 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2115571984 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2116475791 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2117317003 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2122027830 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2136284733 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2156452823 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2160921747 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2168787182 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2171251365 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2182269197 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2221679987 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2344114275 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2428069039 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2612891587 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2763135972 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W2955744844 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W3121173933 @default.
• W2024530015 cites W137384375 @default.
• W2024530015 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s66677" @default.
• W2024530015 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4199858" @default.
• W2024530015 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25336990" @default.
• W2024530015 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2024530015 type Work @default.
• W2024530015 sameAs 2024530015 @default.
• W2024530015 citedByCount "295" @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152015 @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152016 @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152017 @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152018 @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152019 @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152020 @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152021 @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152022 @default.
• W2024530015 countsByYear W20245300152023 @default.
• W2024530015 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2024530015 hasAuthorship W2024530015A5001004774 @default.
• W2024530015 hasAuthorship W2024530015A5002700523 @default.
• W2024530015 hasAuthorship W2024530015A5023729007 @default.
• W2024530015 hasAuthorship W2024530015A5025500200 @default.
• W2024530015 hasAuthorship W2024530015A5065722003 @default.
• W2024530015 hasAuthorship W2024530015A5069590194 @default.
• W2024530015 hasAuthorship W2024530015A5078175691 @default.
• W2024530015 hasAuthorship W2024530015A5082433686 @default.
• W2024530015 hasBestOaLocation W20245300151 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C61863361 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConcept C89128539 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C105795698 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C142724271 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C205649164 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C23131810 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C2778755073 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C33923547 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C512399662 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C58640448 @default.
• W2024530015 hasConceptScore W2024530015C61863361 @default.

• next