FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024658886> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2024658886 endingPage "19" @default.
• W2024658886 startingPage "11" @default.
• W2024658886 abstract "Since the end of the 18 th c, Vilnius city planning conceptions and their realization start demonstrating strong features of rational city structure formation manifesting themselves in the composition based on strict geometry and developed at the level of the entire city. The paper discusses how the classicistic urban formation ideas show themselves in Vilnius city planning conceptions of the end of the 18 th c–19th c and tries to highlight some features of realization of the conceptions based on these ideas. The first part of the paper deals with classicistic planning conceptions of Vilnius city and the sociocultural context of their preparation. The second part investigates spread of artistic ideas of Classicism in Vilnius city planning conceptions referring to analysis of combinations of geometric forms. The third part studies how much the newly-adapted urban forms confront with function in conceptions and their realization. Generalizations maintain that rationality and universality are the most distinct features in Vilnius city planning conceptions of the period under consideration. In city formation, classicistic rationalization manifests itself in a strict planned composition, whereas classicistic universality shows itself in application of a standardized colonial city scheme. The most distinct transformations are found in the conceptions of the tsarist period that include strong, although formal city development through transformation of the available city parts, joining of the developed outskirts with the city territory and providing them with the features of the city being transformed as well as planning new city parts in free areas. In the process of planning different city parts, the same set of composition formation tools is applied. Analysis of three objects, i.e. straight lines, intersections thereof and figures formed by them, demonstrates that application of these forms during the tsarist period is confined to quite a minimum quantity of combinations. Usually, an (ir)regular rectangular scheme of a street network is applied. In application of combinations of straight lines, the following three cases are possible: (a) a straight line is applied as an aesthetic measure to solve just aesthetic tasks; (b) a straight line is applied to solve just functional tasks, when an aesthetic aspect remains secondary; (c) a straight line is adapted in compliance with aesthetics and functionality balance, i.e. “aesthetical function”. In some places, analysis of realization of city planning conceptions shows a gap between aesthetics and functionality (case “a”), where a paradox of non-universality of classicistic universal or irrationality of rationality is hidden when universal as a rational functional scheme denies itself due to its non-functionality applying rationalized aesthetics by formal tools in a particular context. A few reasons of non-realisation of the conceptions under consideration may be distinguished: (a) private property impeding realization of general urban visions; (b) absence of motivation for actual city development; (c) incompliance of plans with actual topographic basics; (d) resistance of population to irrational change of an urbanistic network. Most likely, this is the active participation of residents in the process of planning and correction thereof that helped to avoid tsarist contradictions between aesthetics and functionality found in Vilnius plans. Santrauka Nuo XVIII a. pab. Vilniaus miesto planavimo koncepcijose ir realizacijose atsiranda ryškių racionalios miesto struktūros formavimo bruožų, kurie reiškiasi griežta geometrizuota kompozicija, plėtojama viso miesto mastu. Straipsnyje siekiama atskleisti šių transformacijų raišką XVIII a. pab-XIX a. Vilniaus miesto plėtros koncepcijose ir bandoma pabrėžti kai kuriuos šiomis idėjomis paremtų koncepcijų realizacijų bruožus. Pirmojoje straipsnio dalyje nagrinėjamos Vilniaus miesto klasicistinės planavimo koncepcijos ir jų rengimo kontekstas. Antrojoje ir trečiojoje dalyse remiantis geometrinių formų kombinacijų analize nagrinėjama klasicizmo meninių idėjų sklaida Vilniaus miesto planavimo koncepcijose. Trečiojoje dalyje analizuojama, kiek naujai adaptuojamos miesto formos konfrontuoja su funkcija koncepcijose ir jų realizacijose. Straipsnyje nagrinėjama, kaip racionalia miestų planavimo schema siekiama spręsti epochos meninius uždavinius, tačiau pastebima, kad kartais ši schema taikoma remiantis vien meniniais principais, nepaisant konteksto. Tai savo ruožtu lemia konfrontaciją su funkcija, kai dėl šios kontroversijos klasicistinė miesto formavimo schema ne visada yra pritaikoma." @default.
• W2024658886 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2024658886 creator A5058285757 @default.
• W2024658886 date "2009-03-31" @default.
• W2024658886 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2024658886 title "VILNIAUS MIESTO PLANO TRANSFORMACIJOS XVIII A. PAB.-XIX A." @default.
• W2024658886 cites W1525164557 @default.
• W2024658886 cites W1986684144 @default.
• W2024658886 doi "https://doi.org/10.3846/13921630.2009.33.11-19" @default.
• W2024658886 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2024658886 type Work @default.
• W2024658886 sameAs 2024658886 @default.
• W2024658886 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2024658886 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2024658886 hasAuthorship W2024658886A5058285757 @default.
• W2024658886 hasBestOaLocation W20246588861 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C183992945 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C201717286 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C49545453 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C52438962 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConcept C70721018 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C111472728 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C121332964 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C127413603 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C138885662 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C144024400 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C147176958 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C166957645 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C183992945 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C201717286 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C205649164 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C2779343474 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C49545453 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C52438962 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C62520636 @default.
• W2024658886 hasConceptScore W2024658886C70721018 @default.
• W2024658886 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2024658886 hasLocation W20246588861 @default.
• W2024658886 hasOpenAccess W2024658886 @default.
• W2024658886 hasPrimaryLocation W20246588861 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W191890029 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W1998285424 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W2024658886 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W2163676192 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W2178271913 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W2378602177 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W2399810383 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W2615682951 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W3135846203 @default.
• W2024658886 hasRelatedWork W3087130109 @default.
• W2024658886 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2024658886 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2024658886 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2024658886 magId "2024658886" @default.
• W2024658886 workType "article" @default.