FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024796543> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2024796543 abstract "In an age of mass digitization with book scanning projects like Google and Microsoft and their open access rival, the Open Archives Initiative, it is easy to forget that this is not the first time such efforts to the world's information and make it universally accessible and have been attempted. In 1926, A. W. Pollard and G. R. Redgrave compiled A short-title catalogue of books printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English books printed abroad, 1475-1640 which at that time was the most comprehensive bibliography of English printed material in the early modern period. That project later developed into Early English Books (EEB), a microfilm project started by University Microfilms International (UMI), and an electronic database Early English Books Online (EEBO) produced by ProQuest Information and Learning. Comments Reprinted from Microform and Imaging Review, Volume 36, Issue 4, Fall 2007, pages 159-164. At the time of publication, the author, Shawn Martin, was affiliated with the University of Michigan. Currently, he is the Scholarly Communication Librarian at Penn Libraries of the University of Pennsylvania. This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/library_papers/66 Shawn Martin (shawnmar@ umichedu) is Project Librarian for the Text Creation Partnership at the University of Michigan. In an age of mass digitization with book scanning projects like Google and Microsoft and their open access rival, the Open Archives Initiative, it is easy to forget that this is not the first time such efforts to the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful1 have been attempted. In 1926, A. W. Pollard and G. R. Redgrave compiled A short-title catalogue of books printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English books printed abroad, 1475-1640 which at that time was the most comprehensive bibliography of English printed material in the early modern period. That project later developed into Early English Books (EEB), a microfilm project started by University Microfilms International (UMI), and an electronic database Early English Books Online (EEBO) produced by ProQuest Information and Learning. Though current mass digitization projects may hail themselves as the first attempt to organize large amounts of information and make them available, they are not. Certainly they are the first to do so at such a large scale. However, there are lessons that can be drawn from earlier attempts to do the same thing. One could try to do a complete history of information gathering from the time of ancient Egypt. Yet a more useful comparison might be the age of microform. Many of the same arguments about preservation, greater access, and easier search capability are similar to the arguments about mass microfilming only 50 years ago. What is or is not unique about digitization as opposed to microfilm, and, more importantly, what lessons from mass microfilming can be learned for modern electronic projects? By looking at the history of just one of these mass microfilm/digitization projects, Early English Books Online, it may become possible to discover some of the answers to those questions. As early as 1884, efforts had been made to effectively cata-" @default.
• W2024796543 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2024796543 creator A5064267975 @default.
• W2024796543 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2024796543 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2024796543 title "EEBO, Microfilm, and Umberto Eco: Historical Lessons and Future Directions for Building Electronic Collections" @default.
• W2024796543 cites W1544386002 @default.
• W2024796543 cites W2044496838 @default.
• W2024796543 cites W2049919417 @default.
• W2024796543 cites W2064539579 @default.
• W2024796543 doi "https://doi.org/10.1515/mfir.2007.159" @default.
• W2024796543 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2024796543 type Work @default.
• W2024796543 sameAs 2024796543 @default.
• W2024796543 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2024796543 countsByYear W20247965432013 @default.
• W2024796543 countsByYear W20247965432014 @default.
• W2024796543 countsByYear W20247965432016 @default.
• W2024796543 countsByYear W20247965432020 @default.
• W2024796543 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2024796543 hasAuthorship W2024796543A5064267975 @default.
• W2024796543 hasBestOaLocation W20247965432 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConcept C8184842 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConceptScore W2024796543C136764020 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConceptScore W2024796543C161191863 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConceptScore W2024796543C166957645 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConceptScore W2024796543C41008148 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConceptScore W2024796543C8184842 @default.
• W2024796543 hasConceptScore W2024796543C95457728 @default.
• W2024796543 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2024796543 hasLocation W20247965431 @default.
• W2024796543 hasLocation W20247965432 @default.
• W2024796543 hasOpenAccess W2024796543 @default.
• W2024796543 hasPrimaryLocation W20247965431 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W1973220707 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W2066924613 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W2260924514 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W2503590191 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W4285535555 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W1540928328 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W210216383 @default.
• W2024796543 hasRelatedWork W2972664891 @default.
• W2024796543 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W2024796543 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2024796543 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2024796543 magId "2024796543" @default.
• W2024796543 workType "article" @default.