Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2024956995> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2024956995 endingPage "1530" @default.
- W2024956995 startingPage "1522" @default.
- W2024956995 abstract "Purpose: To compare the Para Mixed technique for irradiation of the internal mammary nodes (IMN) with three commonly used strategies, by analyzing the dose to the heart and other organs at risk. Methods and Materials: Four different three-dimensional conformal dose plans were created for 30 breast cancer patients. The IMN were enclosed with the Para Mixed technique by a widened mediolateral tangent photon beam and an anterior electron beam, with the Patched technique by an anterior electron beam, with the Standard technique by an anterior photon and electron beam, and with the PWT technique by partially wide tangents. All techniques were optimized for conformality and produced equally adequate target coverage. Results: Heart dose was lowest with the Para Mixed and Patched technique for all patients and with the PWT technique for right-sided treatment only. Lung dose was highest with the PWT, lowest with the Patched, and intermediate with the Para Mixed and Standard techniques. Skin dose was highest with the Patched, lowest with the PWT, and intermediate with the Para Mixed and the Standard techniques. The Para Mixed technique resulted in a 13-Gy lower dose in an overlap area, and the PWT technique was the only technique that incorporated considerable volumes of the contralateral breast. Conclusion: The Para Mixed technique yielded the overall best results. No other technique resulted in a lower heart dose. Lung and skin were equally spared instead of one of them being compromised, and the contralateral breast was avoided. Purpose: To compare the Para Mixed technique for irradiation of the internal mammary nodes (IMN) with three commonly used strategies, by analyzing the dose to the heart and other organs at risk. Methods and Materials: Four different three-dimensional conformal dose plans were created for 30 breast cancer patients. The IMN were enclosed with the Para Mixed technique by a widened mediolateral tangent photon beam and an anterior electron beam, with the Patched technique by an anterior electron beam, with the Standard technique by an anterior photon and electron beam, and with the PWT technique by partially wide tangents. All techniques were optimized for conformality and produced equally adequate target coverage. Results: Heart dose was lowest with the Para Mixed and Patched technique for all patients and with the PWT technique for right-sided treatment only. Lung dose was highest with the PWT, lowest with the Patched, and intermediate with the Para Mixed and Standard techniques. Skin dose was highest with the Patched, lowest with the PWT, and intermediate with the Para Mixed and the Standard techniques. The Para Mixed technique resulted in a 13-Gy lower dose in an overlap area, and the PWT technique was the only technique that incorporated considerable volumes of the contralateral breast. Conclusion: The Para Mixed technique yielded the overall best results. No other technique resulted in a lower heart dose. Lung and skin were equally spared instead of one of them being compromised, and the contralateral breast was avoided." @default.
- W2024956995 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2024956995 creator A5003320817 @default.
- W2024956995 creator A5019736783 @default.
- W2024956995 creator A5046303352 @default.
- W2024956995 creator A5059208742 @default.
- W2024956995 creator A5071664233 @default.
- W2024956995 date "2005-12-01" @default.
- W2024956995 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2024956995 title "Comparison of normal tissue dose with three-dimensional conformal techniques for breast cancer irradiation including the internal mammary nodes" @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1969555548 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1970174131 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1978317094 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1980027490 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1984412208 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1985071787 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1986203640 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1987609960 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W1994439728 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2002049757 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2003564442 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2004991805 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2011242979 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2021585442 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2022857698 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2025745731 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2028663639 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2032559105 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2039007329 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2048716754 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2049242735 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2051155200 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2063265458 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2078988557 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2080962780 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2084174155 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2095070954 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2119451237 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2122761438 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2141215053 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2156003808 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2166428492 @default.
- W2024956995 cites W2167884619 @default.
- W2024956995 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.027" @default.
- W2024956995 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15994027" @default.
- W2024956995 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2024956995 type Work @default.
- W2024956995 sameAs 2024956995 @default.
- W2024956995 citedByCount "34" @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952012 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952013 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952014 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952015 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952016 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952017 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952018 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952019 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952021 @default.
- W2024956995 countsByYear W20249569952022 @default.
- W2024956995 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2024956995 hasAuthorship W2024956995A5003320817 @default.
- W2024956995 hasAuthorship W2024956995A5019736783 @default.
- W2024956995 hasAuthorship W2024956995A5046303352 @default.
- W2024956995 hasAuthorship W2024956995A5059208742 @default.
- W2024956995 hasAuthorship W2024956995A5071664233 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C111337013 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C111337013 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C121332964 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C121608353 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C126322002 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C136229726 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C185544564 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C2989005 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C530470458 @default.
- W2024956995 hasConceptScore W2024956995C71924100 @default.
- W2024956995 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2024956995 hasLocation W20249569951 @default.
- W2024956995 hasLocation W20249569952 @default.
- W2024956995 hasOpenAccess W2024956995 @default.
- W2024956995 hasPrimaryLocation W20249569951 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W108213934 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W1990999997 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W2058270877 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W2077990344 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W2081685347 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W2144554917 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W2170903254 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W2272899425 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W2414479948 @default.
- W2024956995 hasRelatedWork W2473431470 @default.