Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025040257> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2025040257 endingPage "1753" @default.
- W2025040257 startingPage "1747" @default.
- W2025040257 abstract "BackgroundTreatment for adult subglottic stenosis is technically demanding and no therapeutic algorithm exists. We performed the present meta-analysis of treatment for this condition in an attempt to compare efficacy on the basis of type of procedure.MethodsWe identified 24 eligible retrospective studies reporting the therapeutic results for inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by combining the results of the reported success rates; success is defined as a condition requiring no further treatment. The relative risk was used as a summary statistic.ResultsPooled success rates of laryngotracheal resection and anastomosis (12 articles) and laryngoplasty with or without grafting (7 articles) were 95% and 76%, respectively, using a random-effects model. Success rates of endoscopic dilatation and laser resection (6 articles) varied between 40% and 82%. Meta-regression analysis showed a significant difference in the success rates between laryngotracheal reconstruction and laryngoplasty and between laryngotracheal reconstruction and an endoscopic procedure. When the indication for endoscopic management was a lesion size less than 1 cm, the results were significantly better.ConclusionsThe success rate of laryngotracheal reconstruction is significantly higher than that of laryngoplasty or endoscopic intervention; however, endoscopic intervention is worth trying for lesions smaller than 1 cm without framework destruction. Treatment for adult subglottic stenosis is technically demanding and no therapeutic algorithm exists. We performed the present meta-analysis of treatment for this condition in an attempt to compare efficacy on the basis of type of procedure. We identified 24 eligible retrospective studies reporting the therapeutic results for inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by combining the results of the reported success rates; success is defined as a condition requiring no further treatment. The relative risk was used as a summary statistic. Pooled success rates of laryngotracheal resection and anastomosis (12 articles) and laryngoplasty with or without grafting (7 articles) were 95% and 76%, respectively, using a random-effects model. Success rates of endoscopic dilatation and laser resection (6 articles) varied between 40% and 82%. Meta-regression analysis showed a significant difference in the success rates between laryngotracheal reconstruction and laryngoplasty and between laryngotracheal reconstruction and an endoscopic procedure. When the indication for endoscopic management was a lesion size less than 1 cm, the results were significantly better. The success rate of laryngotracheal reconstruction is significantly higher than that of laryngoplasty or endoscopic intervention; however, endoscopic intervention is worth trying for lesions smaller than 1 cm without framework destruction." @default.
- W2025040257 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2025040257 creator A5000730403 @default.
- W2025040257 creator A5002530571 @default.
- W2025040257 creator A5033423294 @default.
- W2025040257 creator A5076154319 @default.
- W2025040257 creator A5085532693 @default.
- W2025040257 date "2011-06-01" @default.
- W2025040257 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2025040257 title "Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Procedures for Acquired Subglottic Stenosis in Adults" @default.
- W2025040257 cites W128006794 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W158450075 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W1973968104 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2002048172 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2018120978 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2023025681 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2040705556 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2043585532 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2049106042 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2067730250 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2077419873 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2082619384 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2085916191 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2099177143 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2107328434 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2109818079 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2110583987 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2111366944 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2120529928 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2123353414 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2125435699 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2126602143 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2133683650 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2147223017 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2153245438 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2158766942 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2183146835 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2317730513 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2320958766 @default.
- W2025040257 cites W2417389264 @default.
- W2025040257 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.02.071" @default.
- W2025040257 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21619972" @default.
- W2025040257 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2025040257 type Work @default.
- W2025040257 sameAs 2025040257 @default.
- W2025040257 citedByCount "59" @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572012 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572013 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572014 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572015 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572016 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572017 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572018 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572019 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572020 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572021 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572022 @default.
- W2025040257 countsByYear W20250402572023 @default.
- W2025040257 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2025040257 hasAuthorship W2025040257A5000730403 @default.
- W2025040257 hasAuthorship W2025040257A5002530571 @default.
- W2025040257 hasAuthorship W2025040257A5033423294 @default.
- W2025040257 hasAuthorship W2025040257A5076154319 @default.
- W2025040257 hasAuthorship W2025040257A5085532693 @default.
- W2025040257 hasBestOaLocation W20250402571 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C105922876 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C2778778528 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C2780474809 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C2909948008 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C105922876 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C126322002 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C126838900 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C141071460 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C167135981 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C2778451229 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C2778778528 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C2780007028 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C2780474809 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C2909948008 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C71924100 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C8443397 @default.
- W2025040257 hasConceptScore W2025040257C95190672 @default.
- W2025040257 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W2025040257 hasLocation W20250402571 @default.
- W2025040257 hasLocation W20250402572 @default.
- W2025040257 hasOpenAccess W2025040257 @default.
- W2025040257 hasPrimaryLocation W20250402571 @default.
- W2025040257 hasRelatedWork W1506061659 @default.
- W2025040257 hasRelatedWork W2011069475 @default.