FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025247019> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025247019 endingPage "89" @default.
• W2025247019 startingPage "87" @default.
• W2025247019 abstract "Reviewed by: The Mythological Traditions of Liturgical Drama: The Eucharist as Theater Ivor J. Davidson The Mythological Traditions of Liturgical Drama: The Eucharist as Theater. By Christine C. Schnusenberg. (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press. 2010. Pp. xx, 359. $44.95. ISBN 978-0-809-10544-1.) In this ambitious study, the author seeks to account for the evolution of early Christian liturgy in the light of the mythological and dramatic traditions of ancient cultures. Drawing heavily on the work of Mircea Eliade and Paul Ricoeur, Schnusenberg elaborates the significance of the claim “[i]n the [End Page 87] beginning there was theater” (p. 273) on two levels: the historical and the interpretative. All ancient cultures, she argues, have their cosmogonic myths; at the heart of the rituals, festivals, and practices of their theaters lies the endeavor to represent and mimetically re-enact these creation stories. In a series of learned chapters, she traces wide-ranging examples in the theaters of Egypt and Babylon, Hittite cult-drama and festival, the theater of Canaan-Ugarit, the cosmogony of ancient Israel, and the dramas of ancient Syria. At an analytical level, the pervasiveness of the theme of creativity in dramatic performance across these civilizations points to a fundamental reality—cosmogony itself is inherently an act of staging; the creation of a world by divine agency of one sort of another is, irreducibly, a theatrical business, the primordial presentation of that which is. The dramatic impulse, made manifest in literally endless expressions of human creative activity, is intrinsic to human culture precisely insofar as the cosmos itself is constituted in a piece of drama par excellence. For Schnusenberg, this insight demands a rethinking of the context of early Christian attitudes to the theater. Contrary to some (alarmingly enduring) Western assumptions, theater was not invented by the Greeks and the Romans, for the emergence of an “official” dramatic setting, the theater of the Greek tragedians and their heirs, amounted only to a development upon a long-established instinct: a capacity now to reflect dramatically on the power of theater to be reflective. When the first Christians started to make their startling claims about the significance of Jesus, they did so in a world in which the supremacy of Rome was supposed (by its architects, at least) to represent the ultimate expression of the triumph embedded in Rome’s founding myths, and Roman theater—games, rituals, and plays—typified the creative expression of that fact. Early devotion to Jesus—the depiction and imitation of his moral character and the celebration of his redemptive actions centrally in the ritual of the Eucharist—was, in a real sense, just another creative act of theater. It was, of course, a bold one, for in the nascent contention that the Christ-event was the incarnation of the one true God, the original creator of all things, the mimesis practiced by his followers professed universal pertinence. The corporate life and practices of Christ’s followers constituted drama like no other, for in the liturgy of the Eucharist, a performance that absorbed but crucially reshaped both Jewish and Roman practices, the early church saw itself as engaging in representative actions of a definitive order: participating in the ultimate theater of the creator God. It is this that explains the vehemence of early Christianity’s lengthy story of opposition to the Roman or secular theater (a subject explored more fully by Schnusenberg in earlier work). Christian leaders were against the world’s theater not so much because it was theater, but because it was, for them, the wrong theater. As an exercise in comparative religion, Schnusenberg’s work demonstrates exceptional learning in a very large range of literature; her argument [End Page 88] contains many astute observations and is presented with admirable clarity. The foundational assumption about the general cultural significance of cosmogonic drama, although overstated at points, is essentially sound, as certainly is the quest to discern the performative aspects of early Christian piety and the self-consciously competitive missionary strategies by which it was disseminated. Where the study falls down is in its failure to take nearly seriously enough the radical nature of early Christian drama. Although Schnusenberg rightly sees that the..." @default.
• W2025247019 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025247019 creator A5037289657 @default.
• W2025247019 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2025247019 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2025247019 title "<i>The Mythological Traditions of Liturgical Drama: The Eucharist as Theater</i> (review)" @default.
• W2025247019 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cat.2012.0017" @default.
• W2025247019 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2025247019 type Work @default.
• W2025247019 sameAs 2025247019 @default.
• W2025247019 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2025247019 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025247019 hasAuthorship W2025247019A5037289657 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C2777852031 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C2780493273 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C33566652 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C519517224 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C523419034 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C523496792 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C56324269 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C111919701 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C124952713 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C138885662 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C142362112 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C27206212 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C2777852031 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C2780493273 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C33566652 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C41008148 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C519517224 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C52119013 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C523419034 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C523496792 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C56324269 @default.
• W2025247019 hasConceptScore W2025247019C95457728 @default.
• W2025247019 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2025247019 hasLocation W20252470191 @default.
• W2025247019 hasOpenAccess W2025247019 @default.
• W2025247019 hasPrimaryLocation W20252470191 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W2095284436 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W2123058944 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W2528300498 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W2534633130 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W2761924136 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W3130390008 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W4234351360 @default.
• W2025247019 hasRelatedWork W620804070 @default.
• W2025247019 hasVolume "98" @default.
• W2025247019 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2025247019 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2025247019 magId "2025247019" @default.
• W2025247019 workType "article" @default.