FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025457415> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025457415 endingPage "22" @default.
• W2025457415 startingPage "11" @default.
• W2025457415 abstract "Serious discussion of cinema phenomenon called deep focus (or great depth of field) began with a discursive series of essays by Andre Bazin. Prior to about 1940, there appears to be no mention of deep-space composition although clear pictures were often remarked upon. Since Bazin, however, considerable attention has been paid issue of depth in cinema image. This issue is viewed as one of cornerstones of Bazin's theories and is mentioned prominently in most film history books. The discussion has been carried on partly by Henderson in distinguishing Bazin from Eisenstein,' in Charles Barr's seminal essay on CinemaScope,2 in articles by Patrick Oagle and Jean-Louis Comolli,3 and elsewhere.4 The literature on deep focus is extensive enough to consider its discussion as a model for discovering assumptions and directions of cinema theory making (and, by extension, making of cinema history). In fact, it is fruitful to confront aesthetic, technological, and ideological assumptions in existing deep focus cinema theory with rest of history. With this strategy, it may be possible to suggest by extension some more specificity and substance to more general issues vexing current cinema theory and history.5 Barry Salt's efforts seem to have a similar motivation in that, even given limitations on his work, he is trying to test theory with observation of actual films.6 The history of comment on deep focus by name began when Bazin opposed his realist espousal of it (and of long take) to very rapid cutting technique or montage. For Bazin, cinema is best when it most closely imitates his vision of what real is like. This realist/idealist stand thus affirms quality of long take since it presents the world in all of its visible continuity, and of deep focus which allows all of things to be clearly seen through this window on that is cinema screen. For this reason, Bazin admires Welles, Wyler, and central Italian neorealist films. The Bazinian tradition acknowledges, but seldom if ever explores, implications of what mediation of film creation processes does to reality of when rendering a film. This flaw, this frequent ignoring of fact that film is a mediated semblance of reality, lies at heart of this realist/idealist stand. Patrick Ogle continues Bazin's approach to film history, sharing basic assumption that cinema history is a history of technological improvements. This stand implicitly posits early films as primitive because they seem flat, grainy, shaky, monochrome, and silent. Later films become better as realistic quality of image seems to take on look of life itself, with full color, sound, dense visuals, and like. Also this position which stresses technology tends to ignore aesthetic and ideological or, at least, to place technology above aesthetic and beyond ideology. It implies that technology is in control of artist, and affirmation of film history as a story of an always-enlarging paintbox of film tools denies possible full artistic status to earlier films. That is, this position posits progress in art-in itself a contradiction in terms. The technological domination of cinema comment has held sway long enough. The cinema began, apparently, with inventors who desired a machine that could record reality. It continued mainly in hands of those who took realism as their mechanical and even aesthetic guide. But" @default.
• W2025457415 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025457415 creator A5056691204 @default.
• W2025457415 date "1980-01-01" @default.
• W2025457415 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2025457415 title "Ideological and Technological Determinism in Deep-Space Cinema Images: Issues in Ideology, Technological History, and Aesthetics" @default.
• W2025457415 cites W1530324481 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W1968370259 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2049346527 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2056138263 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2058768879 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2060406677 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2066126760 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2127640664 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2135998577 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2323637252 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W2326866432 @default.
• W2025457415 cites W587488575 @default.
• W2025457415 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/1212186" @default.
• W2025457415 hasPublicationYear "1980" @default.
• W2025457415 type Work @default.
• W2025457415 sameAs 2025457415 @default.
• W2025457415 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2025457415 countsByYear W20254574152013 @default.
• W2025457415 countsByYear W20254574152018 @default.
• W2025457415 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025457415 hasAuthorship W2025457415A5056691204 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C192183473 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C2778572836 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C519580073 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C80457461 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C107038049 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C111472728 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C138885662 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C142362112 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C144024400 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C153349607 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C158071213 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C17744445 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C192183473 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C199539241 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C2778572836 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C36289849 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C41895202 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C519580073 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C80457461 @default.
• W2025457415 hasConceptScore W2025457415C94625758 @default.
• W2025457415 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2025457415 hasLocation W20254574151 @default.
• W2025457415 hasOpenAccess W2025457415 @default.
• W2025457415 hasPrimaryLocation W20254574151 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W1483377625 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W2030140929 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W2091032866 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W2131383354 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W2283992843 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W2352987398 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W2385009897 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W2905009602 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W4233733380 @default.
• W2025457415 hasRelatedWork W4324004961 @default.
• W2025457415 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2025457415 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2025457415 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2025457415 magId "2025457415" @default.
• W2025457415 workType "article" @default.