FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025482641> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025482641 endingPage "638" @default.
• W2025482641 startingPage "630" @default.
• W2025482641 abstract "Abstract Context: Appropriate methods for evaluating clinical proficiencies are essential to ensuring entry-level competence in athletic training. Objective: To identify the methods Approved Clinical Instructors (ACIs) use to evaluate student performance of clinical proficiencies. Design: Cross-sectional design. Setting: Public and private institutions in National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) District 4. Patients or Other Participants: Approved Clinical Instructors from accredited athletic training education programs in the Great Lakes Athletic Trainers' Association, which is NATA District 4 (N = 135). Data Collection and Analysis: Participants completed a previously validated survey instrument, Methods of Clinical Proficiency Evaluation in Athletic Training, that consisted of 15 items, including demographic characteristics of the respondents and Likert-scale items (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) regarding methods of clinical proficiency evaluation, barriers, educational content areas, and clinical experience settings. We used analyses of variance and 2-tailed, independent-samples t tests to assess differences among ACI demographic characteristics and the methods, barriers, educational content areas, settings, and opportunities for feedback regarding clinical proficiency evaluation. Qualitative analysis of respondents' comments was completed. Results: The ACIs (n = 106 of 133 respondents, 79.7%) most often used simulations to evaluate clinical proficiencies. Only 59 (55.1%) of the 107 ACIs responding to a follow-up question reported that they feel students engage in a sufficient number of real-time evaluations to prepare them for entry-level practice. An independent-samples t test revealed that no particular clinical experience setting provided more opportunities than another for real-time evaluations (t119 range, −0.909 to 1.796, P ≥ .05). The occurrence of injuries not coinciding with the clinical proficiency evaluation timetable (4.00 ± 0.832) was a barrier to real-time evaluations. Respondents' comments indicated much interest in opportunities and barriers regarding real-time clinical proficiency evaluations. Conclusions: Most clinical proficiencies are evaluated via simulations. The ACIs should maximize real-time situations to evaluate students' clinical proficiencies whenever feasible. Athletic training education program administrators should develop alternative methods of clinical proficiency evaluations." @default.
• W2025482641 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025482641 creator A5032759995 @default.
• W2025482641 creator A5067347964 @default.
• W2025482641 creator A5087950321 @default.
• W2025482641 date "2009-11-01" @default.
• W2025482641 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2025482641 title "Athletic Training Approved Clinical Instructors' Reports of Real-Time Opportunities for Evaluating Clinical Proficiencies" @default.
• W2025482641 cites W154472165 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W1985228441 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2023637118 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2045598100 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2057029889 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2058310491 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2061311239 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2062434032 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2067758649 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2086940462 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2150373139 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2169064502 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2211629454 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2579555219 @default.
• W2025482641 cites W2591745291 @default.
• W2025482641 doi "https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44.6.630" @default.
• W2025482641 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2775365" @default.
• W2025482641 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19911090" @default.
• W2025482641 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2025482641 type Work @default.
• W2025482641 sameAs 2025482641 @default.
• W2025482641 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412012 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412013 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412014 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412015 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412016 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412017 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412018 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412019 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412020 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412021 @default.
• W2025482641 countsByYear W20254826412022 @default.
• W2025482641 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025482641 hasAuthorship W2025482641A5032759995 @default.
• W2025482641 hasAuthorship W2025482641A5067347964 @default.
• W2025482641 hasAuthorship W2025482641A5087950321 @default.
• W2025482641 hasBestOaLocation W20254826411 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C2779258753 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C2780463512 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C2781418482 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C100521375 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C105776082 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C105795698 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C138496976 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C151730666 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C15744967 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C199360897 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C2777267654 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C2779258753 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C2779343474 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C2780463512 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C2781418482 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C33923547 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C39896193 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C41008148 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C509550671 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C512399662 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C61521584 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C71924100 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C77805123 @default.
• W2025482641 hasConceptScore W2025482641C86803240 @default.
• W2025482641 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2025482641 hasLocation W20254826411 @default.
• W2025482641 hasLocation W20254826412 @default.
• W2025482641 hasLocation W20254826413 @default.
• W2025482641 hasLocation W20254826414 @default.
• W2025482641 hasOpenAccess W2025482641 @default.
• W2025482641 hasPrimaryLocation W20254826411 @default.
• W2025482641 hasRelatedWork W1532679117 @default.
• W2025482641 hasRelatedWork W157595384 @default.
• W2025482641 hasRelatedWork W1608917289 @default.

• next