FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025631428> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025631428 endingPage "416" @default.
• W2025631428 startingPage "401" @default.
• W2025631428 abstract "Study design: It has been previously demonstrated that sustained nonpatterned electric stimulation of the posterior lumbar spinal cord from the epidural space can induce stepping-like movements in subjects with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. In the present paper, we explore physiologically related components of electromyographic (EMG) recordings during the induced stepping-like activity. Objectives: To examine mechanisms underlying the stepping-like movements activated by electrical epidural stimulation of posterior lumbar cord structures. Materials and methods: The study is based on the assessment of epidural stimulation to control spasticity by simultaneous recordings of the electromyographic activity of quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and triceps surae. We examined induced muscle responses to stimulation frequencies of 2.2–50 Hz in 10 subjects classified as having a motor complete spinal cord injury (ASIA A and B). We evaluated stimulus-triggered time windows 50 ms in length from the original EMG traces. Stimulus-evoked compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were analyzed with reference to latency, amplitude, and shape. Results: Epidural stimulation of the posterior lumbosacral cord recruited lower limb muscles in a segmental-selective way, which was characteristic for posterior root stimulation. A 2.2 Hz stimulation elicited stimulus-coupled CMAPs of short latency which were approximately half that of phasic stretch reflex latencies for the respective muscle groups. EMG amplitudes were stimulus-strength dependent. Stimulation at 5–15 and 25–50 Hz elicited sustained tonic and rhythmic activity, respectively, and initiated lower limb extension or stepping-like movements representing different levels of muscle synergies. All EMG responses, even during burst-style phases were composed of separate stimulus-triggered CMAPs with characteristic amplitude modulations. During burst-style phases, a significant increase of CMAP latencies by about 10 ms was observed. Conclusion: The muscle activity evoked by epidural lumbar cord stimulation as described in the present study was initiated within the posterior roots. These posterior roots muscle reflex responses (PRMRRs) to 2.2 Hz stimulation were routed through monosynaptic pathways. Sustained stimulation at 5–50 Hz engaged central spinal PRMRR components. We propose that repeated volleys delivered to the lumbar cord via the posterior roots can effectively modify the central state of spinal circuits by temporarily combining them into functional units generating integrated motor behavior of sustained extension and rhythmic flexion/extension movements. This study opens the possibility for developing neuroprostheses for activation of inherent spinal networks involved in generating functional synergistic movements using a single electrode implanted in a localized and stable region." @default.
• W2025631428 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025631428 creator A5004760790 @default.
• W2025631428 creator A5017331356 @default.
• W2025631428 creator A5024474436 @default.
• W2025631428 creator A5043374209 @default.
• W2025631428 creator A5053555013 @default.
• W2025631428 creator A5057069049 @default.
• W2025631428 creator A5088245246 @default.
• W2025631428 date "2004-05-04" @default.
• W2025631428 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2025631428 title "Stepping-like movements in humans with complete spinal cord injury induced by epidural stimulation of the lumbar cord: electromyographic study of compound muscle action potentials" @default.
• W2025631428 cites W1518998310 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W1675839706 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W1793422275 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W1825506564 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W1873905119 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W1980976464 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W1997659907 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2011694969 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2022237830 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2033046382 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2038993550 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2041488220 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2042787083 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2043019576 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2050837258 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2051308006 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2053061335 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2055526744 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2056731950 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2062423772 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2062689759 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2069308336 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2085846700 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2091460765 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2092054234 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2097150296 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2107510856 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2108318374 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2122134943 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2123004503 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2140210884 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2155213171 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2168307960 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2189905718 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2196814226 @default.
• W2025631428 cites W2399420755 @default.
• W2025631428 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101615" @default.
• W2025631428 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15124000" @default.
• W2025631428 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2025631428 type Work @default.
• W2025631428 sameAs 2025631428 @default.
• W2025631428 citedByCount "244" @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282012 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282013 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282014 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282015 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282016 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282017 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282018 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282019 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282020 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282021 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282022 @default.
• W2025631428 countsByYear W20256314282023 @default.
• W2025631428 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025631428 hasAuthorship W2025631428A5004760790 @default.
• W2025631428 hasAuthorship W2025631428A5017331356 @default.
• W2025631428 hasAuthorship W2025631428A5024474436 @default.
• W2025631428 hasAuthorship W2025631428A5043374209 @default.
• W2025631428 hasAuthorship W2025631428A5053555013 @default.
• W2025631428 hasAuthorship W2025631428A5057069049 @default.
• W2025631428 hasAuthorship W2025631428A5088245246 @default.
• W2025631428 hasBestOaLocation W20256314281 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C127573956 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C178409289 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C2777515770 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C2777657843 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C2778334475 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C2779012798 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C2779918689 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C7146039 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConceptScore W2025631428C105702510 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConceptScore W2025631428C118552586 @default.
• W2025631428 hasConceptScore W2025631428C126322002 @default.

• next