FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025649969> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025649969 endingPage "815" @default.
• W2025649969 startingPage "789" @default.
• W2025649969 abstract "Abstract Depressive disorders may be characterised by hyperattention toward negative information, hypoattention toward positive information, or a combination of both processing biases. In two studies, a dot-probe task was utilised to better ascertain the specific direction and time-course of these biases. In both studies, the dysphoric group showed significantly less attentional allocation toward positive stimuli than the non-dysphoric group. In study two, the dysphoric group also showed greater attentional allocation toward depression-specific stimuli. Importantly, the bias toward depression-specific stimuli, and the bias away from positive stimuli, were uncorrelated with each other. It may be that both biases can act as sufficient, but not necessary, characteristics of dysphoric processing. An additional possibility is that the relative level of each bias type may best characterise dysphoric processing. Each of these possibilities is discussed in turn. Acknowledgements This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We gratefully acknowledge Chad Ebesutani and Laura Elinson for their help with data collection, and a number of anonymous reviewers for their excellent feedback. Notes 1It is important to recognise the benefits and drawbacks of our approach of using positive − neutral and negative–neutral trials, rather than integrated positive–negative trials. As was pointed out by an anonymous reviewer, our use of separate positive–neutral and negative–neutral trials could serve to minimise a true correlation between positive and negative attentional biases. While acknowledging this, given that not all situations need be characterised by the presence of both positive and negative stimuli, and because almost no situation (and perhaps no situation) could be characterised by the presence of only positive and negative stimuli, use of mixed positive-negative trials in the absence of any non-valent stimuli, could cause an equal enhancement of the true correlation. Future research would benefit from a careful analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of each approach. 2Before calculating attentional bias scores, we entered the raw RT data into a 2×2×2×2×2 ANOVA with valence (positive, negative), duration (500 ms, 1500 ms), picture location (left, right), and probe location (left, right) as within-subject variables, and dysphoria (high, low) as a between-subject variable. Significant main effects of picture location, F(1, 70) = 7.97, p<.01, duration, F(1, 70) = 178.25, p<.001 and valence, F(1, 70) = 88.30, p<.001 were identified. Of particular note, the predicted four-way interaction of dysphoria × valence × picture location × probe location reached significance, F(1, 70) = 4.83, p=.03, which provided the basis for the calculation of the attentional bias scores used in the remainder of the analyses. The five-way interaction involving duration did not reach significance, F(1, 70) = 1.46, p>.2. 3Interpretation of these covariate analyses need be made with caution. Miller and Chapman (Citation2001) have pointed out that using a covariate that is highly correlated with the measure of interest may regress out substantial variance, and may leave a variable with little in common with the original construct. With appropriate caution, we believe these covariate analyses remain useful, however, we also believe it important to note these issues of interpretation. 4For these continuous analyses, all participants including those with BDI scores between 6 and 10 were included in the analyses. Results remained similar when excluding this group, however, the nature of continuous analyses required inclusion of the full sample of participants. 5Once again, before calculating attentional bias scores, we entered the raw RT data into a 2×2×2×2×2 ANOVA with valence (positive, negative), duration (200 ms, 1500 ms), picture location (left, right), and probe location (left, right) as within-subject variables, and dysphoria (high, low) as a between-subject variable. Significant main effects of duration, F(1, 63) = 479.80, p<.001, and valence, F(1, 63) = 15.01, p<.001 were identified. The predicted four-way interaction of dysphoria×valence×picture location × probe location reached significance, F(1, 63) = 9.93, p=.002, which provided the basis for the calculation of the attentional bias scores used in the remainder of the analyses. The five-way interaction involving duration did not reach significance, F(1, 63) = 1.66, p=.20." @default.
• W2025649969 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025649969 creator A5040623960 @default.
• W2025649969 creator A5055462114 @default.
• W2025649969 date "2007-06-01" @default.
• W2025649969 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2025649969 title "An evaluation of early and late stage attentional processing of positive and negative information in dysphoria" @default.
• W2025649969 cites W1678343419 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W1694363227 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W1965443260 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W1971542643 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W1990322008 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W1993779168 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2001362807 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2006313488 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2038068277 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2040462476 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2042402348 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2065570833 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2071743179 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2072833030 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2129600186 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2134494498 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2141302415 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2143380734 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2156133811 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2156761163 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2159763130 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W2171975196 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W4213002248 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W4231337898 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W4232489965 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W4240732055 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W4242283740 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W4246834201 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W4253425657 @default.
• W2025649969 cites W4294351883 @default.
• W2025649969 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600843197" @default.
• W2025649969 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2025649969 type Work @default.
• W2025649969 sameAs 2025649969 @default.
• W2025649969 citedByCount "69" @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692012 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692013 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692014 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692015 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692016 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692017 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692018 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692019 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692020 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692021 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692022 @default.
• W2025649969 countsByYear W20256499692023 @default.
• W2025649969 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025649969 hasAuthorship W2025649969A5040623960 @default.
• W2025649969 hasAuthorship W2025649969A5055462114 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C152443987 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C2780421500 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C3018121129 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConcept C87868495 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C118552586 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C138496976 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C152443987 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C15744967 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C169900460 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C180747234 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C2780421500 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C3018121129 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C558461103 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C77805123 @default.
• W2025649969 hasConceptScore W2025649969C87868495 @default.
• W2025649969 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2025649969 hasLocation W20256499691 @default.
• W2025649969 hasOpenAccess W2025649969 @default.
• W2025649969 hasPrimaryLocation W20256499691 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W2012355433 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W2025649969 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W2070955680 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W2076043328 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W2360365151 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W2755434138 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W2755599181 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W3083546786 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W4229002985 @default.
• W2025649969 hasRelatedWork W4244915563 @default.
• W2025649969 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2025649969 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2025649969 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2025649969 magId "2025649969" @default.
• W2025649969 workType "article" @default.