FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025662919> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025662919 endingPage "63" @default.
• W2025662919 startingPage "56" @default.
• W2025662919 abstract "Beginning where my odyssey began, Jackson raises some issues that had been concerned about but which are not adequately covered in my article. He repeats some of my list of possible target traits as set down prior to gathering data with the Family Problems Scale (see Loevinger, Sweet, Ossorio, & LaPerriere, 1962, pp. 67-68). Those putative traits guided our invention of items. They were not our names for traits that were measuring, however, but rather for hypotheses that hoped to test. He is correct that the names are biased, but they were biased in the direction favored by child guidance clinicians of that time. For such reasons, said, we propose to seek scoring keys in the responses of our subjects rather than in our own (Loevinger et al., 1962, p. 59). No one begins with a tabula rasa. As it happened, none of our initial hypotheses were supported by our data. In place of punitiveness, found Authoritarian Family Ideology (AFI). The reason that the prominence in AFI of inability to conceptualize inner life is interesting is that were not looking for it, nor had hypothesized it before setting up the study and writing items. The authors of The Authoritarian Personality (Adomo, Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, & Sanford, 1950) also were turned toward the anti-intraception conception by their data, not by their preconceptions or research priorities. Jackson's suggestion that one should know whether the two statements in our paired-choice items are rigorously opposite, if he means by that contradictory, is incompatible with our aim to state each choice in the way that those holding the opinion would recognize or state it (i.e., incorporating their own rationalizations). The statements often cannot be logically opposite and psychologically opposite at the same time. Because maximal discriminating power is yielded by median items (items that cut the group as near to the middle as possible), items where one alternative is clearly wrong are almost always less valuable. The question of the robustness of our findings with other samples-in particular, other subcultural groups-is a good one. It was investigated by Ernhart (Ernhart & Loevinger, 1969). Although our original homogeneous keying project had found several other clusters of items, only AFI was clearly cross-validated. As her sample was large and diverse, Ernhart was able to study the homogeneity of AFI within cells of her analysis-of-variance study. The fact that the within-cell value of the homogeneity coefficient was almost as high as the homogeneity coefficient for the entire sample shows the robustness of this variable. How many objective personality tests can meet such a criterion? I do not retract the statement that factor analysis of dichotomous items is psychologically meaningless. The fundamental equation of factor analysis states that each variable (here, item) can be expressed as the weighted sum of a set of factors. The weights characterize the item; the factor scores characterize the person. How can the score on a dichotomous item (i.e., 0 or 1) be decomposed into the weighted sum of factor scores? It is mathematically absurd, besides depicting a process hard even to imagine. Sorting items into homogeneous clusters, as did, is more meaningful, or at least less absurd." @default.
• W2025662919 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025662919 creator A5002320349 @default.
• W2025662919 date "1993-01-01" @default.
• W2025662919 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2025662919 title "Ego Development: Questions of Method and Theory" @default.
• W2025662919 cites W1977038629 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W1988923290 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W1997956202 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W2007136552 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W2018339799 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W203517179 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W2056120707 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W2081839422 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W2089428953 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W2118160900 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W2301558815 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W2502992099 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W4236572860 @default.
• W2025662919 cites W4253398441 @default.
• W2025662919 doi "https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0401_12" @default.
• W2025662919 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W2025662919 type Work @default.
• W2025662919 sameAs 2025662919 @default.
• W2025662919 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2025662919 countsByYear W20256629192012 @default.
• W2025662919 countsByYear W20256629192014 @default.
• W2025662919 countsByYear W20256629192016 @default.
• W2025662919 countsByYear W20256629192019 @default.
• W2025662919 countsByYear W20256629192020 @default.
• W2025662919 countsByYear W20256629192021 @default.
• W2025662919 countsByYear W20256629192022 @default.
• W2025662919 countsByYear W20256629192023 @default.
• W2025662919 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025662919 hasAuthorship W2025662919A5002320349 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConcept C145651746 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConcept C9180747 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConceptScore W2025662919C145651746 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConceptScore W2025662919C15744967 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConceptScore W2025662919C180747234 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConceptScore W2025662919C77805123 @default.
• W2025662919 hasConceptScore W2025662919C9180747 @default.
• W2025662919 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2025662919 hasLocation W20256629191 @default.
• W2025662919 hasOpenAccess W2025662919 @default.
• W2025662919 hasPrimaryLocation W20256629191 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W1977158715 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W1980419577 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W1992127446 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W2017284065 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W2057548298 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W2080194388 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W4236850854 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W4242595243 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W4247608875 @default.
• W2025662919 hasRelatedWork W4256082098 @default.
• W2025662919 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W2025662919 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2025662919 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2025662919 magId "2025662919" @default.
• W2025662919 workType "article" @default.