FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025784706> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025784706 endingPage "487" @default.
• W2025784706 startingPage "487" @default.
• W2025784706 abstract "Objectives The Baume Report (1994) on Australia’s surgical workforce had the potential to impact upon the health and educational sectors. This paper analyses the recommendations of this report and their impact at the time and 15 years later (2009). Methods A questionnaire-based study was performed with the 18 senior Fellows and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) solicitor who had been instrumental in facilitating responses to the review. Results The 19 respondents were asked to evaluate 22 areas from the Baume Report. The most highly ranked areas identified as being reasonable in 1994 were: additional funding being made available for more training positions, identifying workforce deficits, moving towards compulsory continuing professional development and having evidence of competence before introducing new technology. In 2009, the most highly ranked areas were: funding for more training positions; compulsory continuing professional development, involving the profession in improvements and broadening the training environment beyond public hospitals. Areas considered to be substantially addressed were: the selection process and encouragement of diversity, workforce numbers and deficits, confirming the educational merit of the training program and the role of professional colleges. Conclusions The Baume Report highlighted many issues including workforce planning, the role of professional organisations in society and the complex interface between health and education. Issues of ongoing standards through a surgical career, access for patients to surgical services, funding for more training posts to provide the appropriate workforce level and distribution, and the assessment and introduction of technology remain priorities. Time has not diminished the relevance of these issues. What is known about this topic? The impact of key government reviews can always be substantial. The Baume Report was directed to postgraduate specialist medical training, particularly surgical training. There have been substantial changes in the health and educational sectors since the report, with significantly more regulation and transparency. What does this paper add? Analysis of the Baume Report after 15 years by the senior office bearers of the RACS who were actively involved in handling and implementing many of the recommendations provides an insight into the dynamics of specialist training. It outlines the significant changes that have occurred and the things that still need to be done. What are the implications for practitioners? Professional bodies have an influential presence across society. They are particularly focused on the standards required to become a practitioner of that profession and the ongoing maintenance of these standards. However, this comes with responsibility for and accountability to society and the community. External reviews, particularly with a political imperative, change both the dynamics and key relationships, issues that the professional bodies must commit to addressing in a positive manner." @default.
• W2025784706 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025784706 creator A5003432993 @default.
• W2025784706 creator A5007868381 @default.
• W2025784706 creator A5013522013 @default.
• W2025784706 creator A5056926494 @default.
• W2025784706 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W2025784706 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2025784706 title "Educational and health impact of the Baume Report: ‘A Cutting Edge: Australia’s Surgical Workforce’" @default.
• W2025784706 cites W1996376799 @default.
• W2025784706 cites W2007375759 @default.
• W2025784706 cites W2026924373 @default.
• W2025784706 cites W2028919648 @default.
• W2025784706 cites W2035326217 @default.
• W2025784706 cites W2401282056 @default.
• W2025784706 cites W2914890310 @default.
• W2025784706 cites W2967964691 @default.
• W2025784706 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/ah14062" @default.
• W2025784706 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25283509" @default.
• W2025784706 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2025784706 type Work @default.
• W2025784706 sameAs 2025784706 @default.
• W2025784706 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2025784706 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025784706 hasAuthorship W2025784706A5003432993 @default.
• W2025784706 hasAuthorship W2025784706A5007868381 @default.
• W2025784706 hasAuthorship W2025784706A5013522013 @default.
• W2025784706 hasAuthorship W2025784706A5056926494 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C155663085 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C2778139618 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C2779968149 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C51067260 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C100521375 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C155663085 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C15744967 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C159110408 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C17744445 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C199539241 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C2778139618 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C2779968149 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C39549134 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C509550671 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C51067260 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C71924100 @default.
• W2025784706 hasConceptScore W2025784706C77805123 @default.
• W2025784706 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2025784706 hasLocation W20257847061 @default.
• W2025784706 hasLocation W20257847062 @default.
• W2025784706 hasOpenAccess W2025784706 @default.
• W2025784706 hasPrimaryLocation W20257847061 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W1530739757 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W174020037 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W1946329049 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W1994711303 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W2110967334 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W2417402690 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W2939277053 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W4251411775 @default.
• W2025784706 hasRelatedWork W1894097962 @default.
• W2025784706 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W2025784706 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2025784706 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2025784706 magId "2025784706" @default.
• W2025784706 workType "article" @default.