FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2025960028> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2025960028 endingPage "30" @default.
• W2025960028 startingPage "30" @default.
• W2025960028 abstract "Debate over species concepts has been a persistent theme in biology. We briefl y summarize competing species concepts and facets of the debate itself. We maintain that the inherent subjectivity within all species concepts is likely to ensure continued disagreement on where to place species limits. Although the debate itself contributes to the understanding of speciation and evolutionary processes, it can take on political overtones through posturing, caricatures, and provocative statements. Empirically, neither basic nor applied science would seem to have been slowed appreciably because the species-concept debate remains unresolved. Similarly, continued disagreement must be placed in its proper context (e.g., be shelved) when considering the preservation of biodiversity. To a considerable extent, this has occurred within the conservation community. The biological species concept (BSC) and its inclusion of diagnosably distinct populations as subspecies remain dominant in ornithology. This may be att ributable, in part, to the seemingly infi nitely fi ne divisions possible under phylogenetic species concepts (PSC)—which, among other things, could strain public credulity over what constitutes a species. Nevertheless, the strengths of each of these concepts are being applied to improve our understanding of biodiversity. The longstanding disagreement over species concepts should not become an impediment to responsible conservation and wildlife manage- ment. It probably has not occurred broadly yet, but there may be potential for such an eff ect in the political arena. Received, accepted. Resumen.—El concepto de especie es un tema polemico en biologia. Resumimos brevemente los distintos conceptos de especie y las facetas del debate. Consideramos que la subjetividad inherente en todos los conceptos de especie garantizan un continuo desacuerdo en como delimitar las especies. Aunque el debate en si mismo contribuye a entender el proceso de especiacion y otros procesos evolutivos, muchas veces se desarrolla en terminos demasiado caricaturescos, burlescos y provocativos. De hecho, la continuidad del debate no parece haber ralentizado ni la ciencia basica ni la aplicada. De igual modo, el continuo desacuerdo debe contextualizarse cuando consideramos la conservacion de la diversidad. El concepto biologico de especie (BSC) y la inclusion de las poblaciones diagnosticables como subespecies, sigue predominando en ornitologia. Esto puede deberse en parte a las infi nitas divisiones que se pueden realizar bajo el concepto fi logenetico de especie (PSC), lo que entre otras cosas, puede afectar el entendimiento del publico en general sobre que es una especie. Sin embargo, los puntos fuertes de cada concepto se estan aplicando para llegar a un mejor entendimiento de la biodiversidad. Este desacuerdo historico sobre el concepto de especie no tiene por que ser un impedimento para una politica responsable para la conservacion y gestion de la vida salvaje." @default.
• W2025960028 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2025960028 creator A5008036771 @default.
• W2025960028 creator A5032262383 @default.
• W2025960028 creator A5071791000 @default.
• W2025960028 creator A5087793524 @default.
• W2025960028 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2025960028 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2025960028 title "VAINLY BEATING THE AIR: SPECIES-CONCEPT DEBATES NEED NOT IMPEDE PROGRESS IN SCIENCE OR CONSERVATION" @default.
• W2025960028 cites W1512010869 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W1981111792 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W1988308488 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W1991347641 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2003220902 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2009664200 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2011443891 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2016325533 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2016596510 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2018632260 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2023822819 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2024980221 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2029344803 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2035142301 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2040452926 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2051810247 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2057665120 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2064270042 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2065384138 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2067818448 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2068065426 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2083458545 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2084221226 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2089616139 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2104222891 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2111180056 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2112061642 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2113336704 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2114164968 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2117762450 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2118079256 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2119951239 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2123566082 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2125936169 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2127586651 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2143140557 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2147757322 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2156875172 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2157030269 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2174860196 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2176117676 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2177506344 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2179235128 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2334839493 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W2335438313 @default.
• W2025960028 cites W4238979921 @default.
• W2025960028 doi "https://doi.org/10.1642/0078-6594(2007)63[30:vbtasd]2.0.co;2" @default.
• W2025960028 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2025960028 type Work @default.
• W2025960028 sameAs 2025960028 @default.
• W2025960028 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2025960028 countsByYear W20259600282013 @default.
• W2025960028 countsByYear W20259600282014 @default.
• W2025960028 countsByYear W20259600282015 @default.
• W2025960028 countsByYear W20259600282016 @default.
• W2025960028 countsByYear W20259600282019 @default.
• W2025960028 countsByYear W20259600282022 @default.
• W2025960028 countsByYear W20259600282023 @default.
• W2025960028 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2025960028 hasAuthorship W2025960028A5008036771 @default.
• W2025960028 hasAuthorship W2025960028A5032262383 @default.
• W2025960028 hasAuthorship W2025960028A5071791000 @default.
• W2025960028 hasAuthorship W2025960028A5087793524 @default.
• W2025960028 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2025960028 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2025960028 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2025960028 hasConceptScore W2025960028C17744445 @default.
• W2025960028 hasConceptScore W2025960028C205649164 @default.
• W2025960028 hasConceptScore W2025960028C86803240 @default.
• W2025960028 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2025960028 hasLocation W20259600281 @default.
• W2025960028 hasOpenAccess W2025960028 @default.
• W2025960028 hasPrimaryLocation W20259600281 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W1641042124 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W1990804418 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W1993764875 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W2013243191 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W2046158694 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W2082860237 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W2130076355 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W2151865869 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2025960028 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2025960028 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W2025960028 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2025960028 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2025960028 magId "2025960028" @default.
• W2025960028 workType "article" @default.