FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026010972> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2026010972 endingPage "572" @default.
• W2026010972 startingPage "549" @default.
• W2026010972 abstract "Spielberg’s LincolnThe Great Emancipator Returns Michael Vorenberg (bio) It begins in the mud and blood of battle. It ends in the heavens—or at least in some kind of twinkling afterlife. The face of the slain president forms in a flame and speaks, transporting us back to the Second Inaugural, six weeks before. Lincoln lives again, pleading with us “to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.”1 The apotheosis is complete. Lincoln is not mere hagiography, however. Only in the last twenty minutes or so of the film do the filmmakers lose their careful control. Only then do they fall back on familiar heroic tableaux: an ashen Lincoln riding over a bloody battlefield, an exchange of honorable hat doffs between Grant and Lee at Appomattox, Lincoln surrounded by dignitaries and friends as he breathes his last. Before those final sequences, the film gives us a much less familiar Lincoln. He is ungainly, hardly the rail-splitter of iconography. He does not orate as much as nasalize. He swears. But most important, and surely most surprising to audiences, he is not the Lincoln who bestows on an unready nation the Emancipation Proclamation, telling all who will listen that the measure is his crowning achievement. Rather, he is a Lincoln consumed by the proclamation’s failings. The inadequacy of the Emancipation Proclamation is not an incidental matter. It is the foundation on which the film rests. That is a remarkable artistic choice, especially in a film delivered to theaters on the eve of the proclamation’s 150th anniversary. And despite all the film’s flaws, from the trivial (the wrong uniform on Grant) to the improbable (Lincoln slapping his son Robert’s face) to the absurd (Lydia Smith and Thaddeus Stevens in bed reading the enrolled resolution for the Thirteenth Amendment), the decision to focus on the fate of emancipation after the proclamation must be respected for its shrewdness and originality. Yet, even though the film offers a fresh approach by following the less familiar terrain of emancipation after the proclamation, it stumbles a bit along the way and in at least three places falls very flat indeed. One of [End Page 549] these missteps is the transposition of the present upon the past: politics in 1865 is depicted through the lens of politics today. A second is the use of a piece of historical fiction as a central premise: that in January 1865 Lincoln faced a choice between securing the antislavery amendment or negotiating an end to the war; Lincoln opted for the amendment and thus, we are led to believe, prolonged the war to serve the higher cause of black freedom. A third misstep is the embrace of an interpretation of the past now renounced by most historians: that Lincoln’s untimely death led to a dismal era of Reconstruction. These elements may make for poor history, but they also enhance the drama significantly. Indeed, the narrative structure and moral power of the film would have withered if the filmmakers had opted at every turn for factual accuracy over good storytelling. Lincoln, then, offers historians and non-historians alike an opportunity to return to two age-old and related questions: How responsible are filmmakers for getting history right? And if they don’t get it right, is their film really that much worse off? When it comes to historical accuracy, Lincoln gets more right than it gets wrong, and foremost among its strengths as a historical text is its assessment of the Emancipation Proclamation as inadequate in the abolition of the law of slavery. The inadequacy of the proclamation as a legal measure is complicated. Rather than flatten this complexity, Tony Kushner’s script engages with it and makes it central to the film, putting the key issues into Lincoln’s voice and language. Early on, during a cabinet meeting in which Lincoln defends his push for the antislavery amendment, he offers a brilliant, lawyerly, and entirely fictional summation. Throughout the war, Lincoln explains, he has used presidential “war powers” embedded in the Constitution to justify his actions against slavery. No one knows what those..." @default.
• W2026010972 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2026010972 creator A5061763586 @default.
• W2026010972 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2026010972 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2026010972 title "Spielberg’s Lincoln: The Great Emancipator Returns" @default.
• W2026010972 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cwe.2013.0080" @default.
• W2026010972 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2026010972 type Work @default.
• W2026010972 sameAs 2026010972 @default.
• W2026010972 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2026010972 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2026010972 hasAuthorship W2026010972A5061763586 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C195244886 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C2778627824 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C2779271020 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C2779669469 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C2781153986 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C2781299270 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C124952713 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C142362112 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C17744445 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C195244886 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C199539241 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C2778627824 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C2779271020 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C2779669469 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C2781153986 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C2781299270 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C52119013 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C94625758 @default.
• W2026010972 hasConceptScore W2026010972C95457728 @default.
• W2026010972 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2026010972 hasLocation W20260109721 @default.
• W2026010972 hasOpenAccess W2026010972 @default.
• W2026010972 hasPrimaryLocation W20260109721 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W1506752332 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W16936788 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W2068136303 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W2068174188 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W2278093800 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W2477024443 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W2770372635 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W2968073591 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W3125534689 @default.
• W2026010972 hasRelatedWork W4205673233 @default.
• W2026010972 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2026010972 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2026010972 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2026010972 magId "2026010972" @default.
• W2026010972 workType "article" @default.