FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026090166> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2026090166 endingPage "759" @default.
• W2026090166 startingPage "756" @default.
• W2026090166 abstract "Summary We evaluate a group of patients who have mobile vocal folds, but have flexible laryngeal examinations suspicious for mild vocal fold paresis. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate if electroglottography (EGG) can predict the probability of having an abnormal laryngeal electromyography (LEMG). Charts of patients evaluated and suspected of having mild vocal fold paresis between August 1, 2004 and March 30, 2006 were reviewed. We compared average EGG contact quotients (CQs), average absolute difference of recorded CQ from normal (|CQ−50%|), and EGG waveforms between patients with normal and abnormal LEMG. Waveforms were evaluated in blinded fashion. Statistical analysis was performed using chi square and t test analyses. One hundred and sixteen patients received both flexible laryngoscopy and LEMG as part of their evaluation. Forty-eight patients (41%) had confirmed paresis by LEMG and 68 patients (59%) had normal LEMGs. Only 9.1% of patients with a normal EGG waveform had an abnormal LEMG. In contrast, 40.4% of patients with an abnormal EGG waveform had abnormal LEMGs. The negative predictive value of a normal EGG waveform for an abnormal LEMG was 90.9%. No significant differences were identified between patients with normal versus abnormal LEMG in terms of average CQ (47.8% vs 46.4%) or |CQ−50%| (6.2 vs 5.6). Patients with a normal EGG waveform are unlikely to have an abnormal LEMG. We evaluate a group of patients who have mobile vocal folds, but have flexible laryngeal examinations suspicious for mild vocal fold paresis. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate if electroglottography (EGG) can predict the probability of having an abnormal laryngeal electromyography (LEMG). Charts of patients evaluated and suspected of having mild vocal fold paresis between August 1, 2004 and March 30, 2006 were reviewed. We compared average EGG contact quotients (CQs), average absolute difference of recorded CQ from normal (|CQ−50%|), and EGG waveforms between patients with normal and abnormal LEMG. Waveforms were evaluated in blinded fashion. Statistical analysis was performed using chi square and t test analyses. One hundred and sixteen patients received both flexible laryngoscopy and LEMG as part of their evaluation. Forty-eight patients (41%) had confirmed paresis by LEMG and 68 patients (59%) had normal LEMGs. Only 9.1% of patients with a normal EGG waveform had an abnormal LEMG. In contrast, 40.4% of patients with an abnormal EGG waveform had abnormal LEMGs. The negative predictive value of a normal EGG waveform for an abnormal LEMG was 90.9%. No significant differences were identified between patients with normal versus abnormal LEMG in terms of average CQ (47.8% vs 46.4%) or |CQ−50%| (6.2 vs 5.6). Patients with a normal EGG waveform are unlikely to have an abnormal LEMG." @default.
• W2026090166 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2026090166 creator A5002337289 @default.
• W2026090166 creator A5043736958 @default.
• W2026090166 creator A5053805880 @default.
• W2026090166 creator A5067353187 @default.
• W2026090166 creator A5073290041 @default.
• W2026090166 date "2008-11-01" @default.
• W2026090166 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2026090166 title "Laryngeal Electroglottography as a Predictor of Laryngeal Electromyography" @default.
• W2026090166 cites W1175272562 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W1482409907 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W1544215838 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W1982548441 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2021418050 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2021608403 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2022025272 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2031105418 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2043411911 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2044648706 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2046440803 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2071995166 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2117136533 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2137399349 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2321061684 @default.
• W2026090166 cites W2950060395 @default.
• W2026090166 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.03.005" @default.
• W2026090166 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18031990" @default.
• W2026090166 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2026090166 type Work @default.
• W2026090166 sameAs 2026090166 @default.
• W2026090166 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2026090166 countsByYear W20260901662012 @default.
• W2026090166 countsByYear W20260901662014 @default.
• W2026090166 countsByYear W20260901662015 @default.
• W2026090166 countsByYear W20260901662016 @default.
• W2026090166 countsByYear W20260901662019 @default.
• W2026090166 countsByYear W20260901662020 @default.
• W2026090166 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2026090166 hasAuthorship W2026090166A5002337289 @default.
• W2026090166 hasAuthorship W2026090166A5043736958 @default.
• W2026090166 hasAuthorship W2026090166A5053805880 @default.
• W2026090166 hasAuthorship W2026090166A5067353187 @default.
• W2026090166 hasAuthorship W2026090166A5073290041 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C173988693 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C178992907 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C2776888792 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C2776989088 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C2777515770 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C2778879792 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C2780336059 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C2780474809 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C50965678 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C118552586 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C126322002 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C141071460 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C173988693 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C178992907 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C2776888792 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C2776989088 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C2777515770 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C2778716859 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C2778879792 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C2780336059 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C2780474809 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C50965678 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C548259974 @default.
• W2026090166 hasConceptScore W2026090166C71924100 @default.
• W2026090166 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2026090166 hasLocation W20260901661 @default.
• W2026090166 hasLocation W20260901662 @default.
• W2026090166 hasOpenAccess W2026090166 @default.
• W2026090166 hasPrimaryLocation W20260901661 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W1527532901 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W1607762730 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W2050642070 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W2258484098 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W2593319502 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W2595849764 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W2611507275 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W3126196423 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W4283786689 @default.
• W2026090166 hasRelatedWork W2076773792 @default.
• W2026090166 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W2026090166 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2026090166 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2026090166 magId "2026090166" @default.
• W2026090166 workType "article" @default.