FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026154482> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2026154482 endingPage "1038" @default.
• W2026154482 startingPage "1034" @default.
• W2026154482 abstract "Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be used to perform resections en bloc for early-stage GI tumors. Pharyngeal ESD is less invasive, but technically difficult. Therefore, innovations to safely and easily perform this procedure are needed. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate ESD under peroral countertraction, a new traction system for improving subepithelial cutting line visualization, compared with conventional ESD. Design Retrospective study. Setting Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Patients A total of 93 patients (140 lesions) with superficial pharyngeal cancers treated with ESD were enrolled. Interventions ESD under peroral countertraction or conventional ESD. Main Outcome Measurements En bloc resection rate, size of the tumor, and procedure time. Results All lesions were resected en bloc by using this technique. The mean longest lesion size was 23.4 mm in the peroral countertraction group and 18.1 mm in the conventional group (P = .038). The mean procedure time did not differ between the 2 groups. Subcutaneous emphysema as an adverse event was observed in the conventional ESD group. No treatment-related adverse events occurred in the peroral countertraction group. Limitations Retrospective comparison. Conclusions ESD under peroral countertraction is easier and appears to be safer for completely removing superficial mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be used to perform resections en bloc for early-stage GI tumors. Pharyngeal ESD is less invasive, but technically difficult. Therefore, innovations to safely and easily perform this procedure are needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate ESD under peroral countertraction, a new traction system for improving subepithelial cutting line visualization, compared with conventional ESD. Retrospective study. Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. A total of 93 patients (140 lesions) with superficial pharyngeal cancers treated with ESD were enrolled. ESD under peroral countertraction or conventional ESD. En bloc resection rate, size of the tumor, and procedure time. All lesions were resected en bloc by using this technique. The mean longest lesion size was 23.4 mm in the peroral countertraction group and 18.1 mm in the conventional group (P = .038). The mean procedure time did not differ between the 2 groups. Subcutaneous emphysema as an adverse event was observed in the conventional ESD group. No treatment-related adverse events occurred in the peroral countertraction group. Retrospective comparison. ESD under peroral countertraction is easier and appears to be safer for completely removing superficial mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers." @default.
• W2026154482 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2026154482 creator A5009214522 @default.
• W2026154482 creator A5030062859 @default.
• W2026154482 creator A5033261180 @default.
• W2026154482 creator A5044898989 @default.
• W2026154482 creator A5078618329 @default.
• W2026154482 date "2012-11-01" @default.
• W2026154482 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2026154482 title "A new technique for pharyngeal endoscopic submucosal dissection: peroral countertraction (with video)" @default.
• W2026154482 cites W1966924533 @default.
• W2026154482 cites W1990503483 @default.
• W2026154482 cites W2009805530 @default.
• W2026154482 cites W2013517182 @default.
• W2026154482 cites W2022809915 @default.
• W2026154482 cites W2031476626 @default.
• W2026154482 cites W2056074071 @default.
• W2026154482 cites W2059692019 @default.
• W2026154482 cites W2086668147 @default.
• W2026154482 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.07.013" @default.
• W2026154482 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22906853" @default.
• W2026154482 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2026154482 type Work @default.
• W2026154482 sameAs 2026154482 @default.
• W2026154482 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822013 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822014 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822015 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822016 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822017 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822019 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822020 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822021 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822022 @default.
• W2026154482 countsByYear W20261544822023 @default.
• W2026154482 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2026154482 hasAuthorship W2026154482A5009214522 @default.
• W2026154482 hasAuthorship W2026154482A5030062859 @default.
• W2026154482 hasAuthorship W2026154482A5033261180 @default.
• W2026154482 hasAuthorship W2026154482A5044898989 @default.
• W2026154482 hasAuthorship W2026154482A5078618329 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConcept C2777137803 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConceptScore W2026154482C126322002 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConceptScore W2026154482C141071460 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConceptScore W2026154482C167135981 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConceptScore W2026154482C197934379 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConceptScore W2026154482C2775862295 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConceptScore W2026154482C2777137803 @default.
• W2026154482 hasConceptScore W2026154482C71924100 @default.
• W2026154482 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2026154482 hasLocation W20261544821 @default.
• W2026154482 hasLocation W20261544822 @default.
• W2026154482 hasOpenAccess W2026154482 @default.
• W2026154482 hasPrimaryLocation W20261544821 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W1997485250 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W2030073909 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W2102931365 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W2104462174 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W2169796813 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W2170005617 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W2395693456 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W2608457719 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W4366124573 @default.
• W2026154482 hasRelatedWork W4379780346 @default.
• W2026154482 hasVolume "76" @default.
• W2026154482 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2026154482 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2026154482 magId "2026154482" @default.
• W2026154482 workType "article" @default.