Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026177921> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2026177921 endingPage "118" @default.
- W2026177921 startingPage "99" @default.
- W2026177921 abstract "Purpose It is widely accepted that the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in the healthcare sector offers great potential for improving the quality of services provided, the efficiency and effectiveness of personnel, and also reducing organizational expenses. This paper seeks to examine various hospital information system (HIS) evaluation methods. Design/methodology/approach In this paper a comprehensive search of the literature concerning the evaluation of complex health information systems is conducted and used to generate a synthesis of the literature around evaluation efforts in this field. Three approaches for evaluating hospital information systems are presented – user satisfaction, usage, and economic evaluation. Findings The main results are that during the past decade, computers and information systems, as well as their resultant products, have pervaded hospitals worldwide. Unfortunately, methodologies to measure the various impacts of these systems have not evolved at the same pace. To summarize, measurement of users' satisfaction with information systems may be the most effective evaluation method in comparison with the rest of the methods presented. Practical implications The methodologies, taxonomies and concepts presented in this paper could benefit researchers and practitioners in the evaluation of HISs. Originality/value This review points out the need for more thorough evaluations of HISs that look at a wide range of factors that can affect the relative success or failure of these systems." @default.
- W2026177921 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2026177921 creator A5007617733 @default.
- W2026177921 creator A5030636575 @default.
- W2026177921 date "2008-05-16" @default.
- W2026177921 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2026177921 title "Methods for evaluating hospital information systems: a literature review" @default.
- W2026177921 cites W117971186 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1490210891 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1510259567 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1541181526 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1544848115 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1571499987 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1573180273 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1583989365 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1587451402 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1705013916 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1721421031 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1791587663 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1791653594 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1877492136 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1954663826 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1970133976 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1972013208 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1975672478 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1976893898 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1993262804 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1995413833 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1996919332 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W1998581510 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2003256231 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2006508756 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W200835434 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2011763946 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2013428904 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2014646675 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2016048805 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2016695548 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2023387455 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2031467180 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2050075077 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2054984345 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2055353381 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2057012437 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2059549509 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2078440180 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2086828789 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2088245771 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2088716340 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2095560279 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2096878712 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2097421654 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2102527024 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2108856141 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2117948235 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2131630297 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2135425799 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2139589125 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2140493146 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2143038285 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2147164934 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2147470311 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2147886517 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2153228836 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2158809862 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2163056391 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2167756992 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2169122828 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2172112217 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2243740029 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2276049535 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2409034763 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W2795596704 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W3124865537 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W3126125366 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W4213454850 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W42585482 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W4651706 @default.
- W2026177921 cites W47186170 @default.
- W2026177921 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/14502190810873849" @default.
- W2026177921 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2026177921 type Work @default.
- W2026177921 sameAs 2026177921 @default.
- W2026177921 citedByCount "28" @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212012 @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212013 @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212014 @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212015 @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212016 @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212017 @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212018 @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212019 @default.
- W2026177921 countsByYear W20261779212023 @default.
- W2026177921 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2026177921 hasAuthorship W2026177921A5007617733 @default.
- W2026177921 hasAuthorship W2026177921A5030636575 @default.
- W2026177921 hasConcept C11012388 @default.
- W2026177921 hasConcept C111472728 @default.