FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026261635> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2026261635 endingPage "704" @default.
• W2026261635 startingPage "684" @default.
• W2026261635 abstract "BACKGROUND: Adults with aphasia often try mightily to produce specific words, but their word-finding attempts are frequently unsuccessful. However, the word retrieval process may contain rich information that communicates a desired message regardless of word-finding success. AIMS: The original article reprinted here reports an investigation that assessed whether patient-generated self cues inherent in the word retrieval process could be interpreted by listener/observers and improve on communicative effectiveness for adults with aphasia. The newly added commentary identifies and reports tentative conclusions from 18 investigations of self-generated cues in aphasia since the 1982 paper. It further provides a rationale for increasing research on self-generated cueing and notes a surprising lack of attention to the questions investigated in the original article. The original research is also connected with more recent qualitative investigations of interactional, as opposed to transactional, communicative exchange. METHODS #ENTITYSTARTX00026; PROCEDURES: While performing single-word production tasks, 10 adults with aphasia produced 107 utterances that contained spontaneous word retrieval behaviours. To determine the communicative value of these behaviours, herein designated self cues or self-generated cues, the utterance-final (potential target) word was edited out and the edited utterances were dubbed onto a videotape. Six naïve observers, three of whom received some context about the nature of word retrieval in aphasia and possible topics for the utterances, and three of whom got no information, predicted the target word of each utterance from the word-finding behaviours alone. The communicative value of the self-generated cues was determined for each individual with aphasia by summing percent correct word retrieval and percent correct observer prediction of target words, based on word retrieval behaviours. The newly added commentary describes some challenges of investigating a communicative value outcome, and indicates what would and would not change about the methods, if we did the study today. OUTCOMES #ENTITYSTARTX00026; RESULTS: The observer group that was given some context information appeared to be more successful at predicting target words than the group without any such information. Self-generated cues enhanced communication for the majority of individuals with aphasia, with some cues (e.g., descriptions/gestures of action or function) appearing to carry more communicative value than others (e.g., semantic associates). The commentary again indicates how and why we would change this portion of the investigation if conducting the study at this time. CONCLUSIONS: The results are consistent with Holland's (1977) premise that people with aphasia do well at communication, regardless of the words they produce. The finding that minimal context information may assist observers in understanding the communicative intent of people with aphasia has important implications for training family members to interpret self-generated cues. The new commentary reinforces these conclusions, highlights potential differences between self cues that improve word-finding success and those that enhance message transmission, and points to some additional research needs." @default.
• W2026261635 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2026261635 creator A5027936007 @default.
• W2026261635 creator A5038963675 @default.
• W2026261635 creator A5043581155 @default.
• W2026261635 date "2006-07-01" @default.
• W2026261635 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2026261635 title "Communicative value of self cues in aphasia: A re‐evaluation" @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1832790333 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1967458459 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1969113666 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1969937821 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1972057012 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1972657714 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1972681014 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1976651293 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1977702605 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1982882725 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1988508441 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1995920566 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1998571889 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1998813972 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W1998849944 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2004158111 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2005495721 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2006509553 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2012299645 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2012606963 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2014208400 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2016096182 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2017248361 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2017604983 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2018333925 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2019257212 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2024581483 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2029413788 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2035180401 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2048444429 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2050420795 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2051932875 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2053562555 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2054881065 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2059686401 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2060704038 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2069380322 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2069658696 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2071045182 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2071114930 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2072456885 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2073163559 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2074581113 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2076266334 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2077668842 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2080851888 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2081675868 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2087350083 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2088042278 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2090631758 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2092024429 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2106103948 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2112235673 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2120325913 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W2323954710 @default.
• W2026261635 cites W4244655813 @default.
• W2026261635 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500334076" @default.
• W2026261635 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2808031" @default.
• W2026261635 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20090926" @default.
• W2026261635 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2026261635 type Work @default.
• W2026261635 sameAs 2026261635 @default.
• W2026261635 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352013 @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352014 @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352016 @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352017 @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352018 @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352020 @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352021 @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352022 @default.
• W2026261635 countsByYear W20262616352023 @default.
• W2026261635 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2026261635 hasAuthorship W2026261635A5027936007 @default.
• W2026261635 hasAuthorship W2026261635A5038963675 @default.
• W2026261635 hasAuthorship W2026261635A5043581155 @default.
• W2026261635 hasBestOaLocation W20262616352 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C2775852435 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C2779422653 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2026261635 hasConcept C86803240 @default.

• next