FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2026387807> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2026387807 endingPage "980" @default.
• W2026387807 startingPage "978" @default.
• W2026387807 abstract "Sir,We read with interest the recent correspondence by Yusuf et al1 describing the factors influencing black intraocular lens (IOL) selection for intractable diplopia.We present retrospective data on our experience with opaque IOLs over a span of 11 years (2003–2014) at our tertiary strabismus and vitreoretinal referral centre in Scotland. Our findings are summarised in Table 1.Table 1Patient characteristicsFive of our six patients were phakic, and underwent routine phacoemulsification surgery, with insertion of a custom-made Ophtec 0.0D black polycarbonate Ani II (‘no hole') IOL into the capsular bag. This lens takes ~12–14 weeks to manufacture, and technical specifications are shown in Figure 1. Its 9-mm optic diameter allows implantation in the capsular bag, and limits side illumination in scotopic conditions. However, as it is not foldable, implantation requires a proportionately larger corneal incision, which could potentially prolong postoperative recovery and increase the risk of future infection and globe rupture.Figure 1Custom-made Ophtec Ani II 0.0 Dpt. Black. Polycarbonate, nonfoldable, posterior chamber IOL (incision >9 mm). Reformatted image, reproduced with permission from Ophtec BV.Whilst we have not formally tested for its near-infrared (NIR) properties, other opaque polycarbonate IOLs in use, such as Ophtec ‘pupil occluder' iris claw IOLs, have been shown to be NIR-blocking, thereby providing total light occlusion and minimising the risk of treatment failure.1, 2 Clinically, all five patients had good resolution of intractable diplopia, albeit with variable light perception. The absolute occlusion with consequent symptomatic reduction of field resulted in explantation of the opaque IOL in one patient. This highlights the importance of considering loss of visual field with complete occlusion, and subsequent poor adaptation to monocular vision.One patient had known Type II diabetes mellitus. Implantation of opaque IOLs in diabetics may be considered a relative contraindication,3 and has not previously been described in the literature to our knowledge. Systemic conditions like diabetes tend to cause bilateral symmetrical ocular pathology.4 In the authors' opinion, regular fundus surveillance of the fellow eye provides a reasonable proxy that predicts development of diabetic eye disease in the occluded eye. However, we concur that higher risk patients may benefit from longer-term follow-up with posterior segment imaging including optical coherence tomography, for example, those with choroidal naevi, suspicious discs, or lattice degeneration." @default.
• W2026387807 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2026387807 creator A5058218010 @default.
• W2026387807 creator A5072938664 @default.
• W2026387807 creator A5079898874 @default.
• W2026387807 date "2015-02-27" @default.
• W2026387807 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2026387807 title "Opaque intraocular lens implantation" @default.
• W2026387807 cites W1999215008 @default.
• W2026387807 cites W2009496176 @default.
• W2026387807 cites W2098041643 @default.
• W2026387807 doi "https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.15" @default.
• W2026387807 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4506329" @default.
• W2026387807 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25721519" @default.
• W2026387807 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2026387807 type Work @default.
• W2026387807 sameAs 2026387807 @default.
• W2026387807 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2026387807 countsByYear W20263878072015 @default.
• W2026387807 countsByYear W20263878072017 @default.
• W2026387807 countsByYear W20263878072020 @default.
• W2026387807 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2026387807 hasAuthorship W2026387807A5058218010 @default.
• W2026387807 hasAuthorship W2026387807A5072938664 @default.
• W2026387807 hasAuthorship W2026387807A5079898874 @default.
• W2026387807 hasBestOaLocation W20263878071 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConcept C15336307 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConcept C2779567214 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConcept C60056205 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConceptScore W2026387807C118487528 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConceptScore W2026387807C119767625 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConceptScore W2026387807C120665830 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConceptScore W2026387807C121332964 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConceptScore W2026387807C15336307 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConceptScore W2026387807C2779567214 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConceptScore W2026387807C60056205 @default.
• W2026387807 hasConceptScore W2026387807C71924100 @default.
• W2026387807 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2026387807 hasLocation W20263878071 @default.
• W2026387807 hasLocation W20263878072 @default.
• W2026387807 hasLocation W20263878073 @default.
• W2026387807 hasLocation W20263878074 @default.
• W2026387807 hasOpenAccess W2026387807 @default.
• W2026387807 hasPrimaryLocation W20263878071 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W1572789608 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W1987931775 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W2362723393 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W2392031052 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W2395329579 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W2414105170 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W2595820800 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W2980292441 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W3032353840 @default.
• W2026387807 hasRelatedWork W4210512273 @default.
• W2026387807 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W2026387807 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2026387807 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2026387807 magId "2026387807" @default.
• W2026387807 workType "article" @default.